And where did you get that idea?
Caleb: "That thing is taking us to the school?"
Captain: "That is the school."
Maybe I misinterpreted it, but I think it's a fair inference.
And where did you get that idea?
Same here.I'm people, and I don't
Agreed, I think the clip is fine and certainly gets me more excited for the show. But there’s definitely some oddities in it, like the unnecessary viewscreen graphic you’re mentioning. I also thought Holly Hunter sounded rather marble-mouthed in this and I hope I’ll be able to understand her on the show proper. I’m also still not a fan of the insta-intra-ship-beaming, but I guess we’re stuck with that from Discovery. Seems a little weird that they are not using it to get the cadets to safety, though.I thought the clip was...fine. my only real issue with it is how on two occasions (I think the first was "tachyons detected") we cut to a shot of the viewscreen (?) superimposed to take up the whole damn shot, saying the same thing over again.
It's just...dumb. Redundant, for sure, but it also just makes me think about the director's (poor) choices and not the story.
Yes, this has been my understanding as well, both from what they’ve been saying in the trailers and from production sources. To be fair, though, I don't think they have clarified whether the Athena is the academy complex in its entirety or just a part of it. If indeed the ship is supposed to be the entire academy then that is certainly a little stupid. Not stupider than the Enterprise-D having children on board, but on the same level.Maybe I misinterpreted it, but I think it's a fair inference.

Tachyons are used for a variety of things, including opening transwarp corridors., aren’t Tachyons usually indicative of time travel stuff, ore am I confusing them with Chronitons? Would kinda fit, because Nus Braka (really odd name, by the way) is later talking about “time with its infinite sense of humor”, which has me wonder if somehow time travel will be a story element.
Tachyons are hypothetical. Chronitons are fictional.Also, aren’t Tachyons usually indicative of time travel stuff, ore am I confusing them with Chronitons? Would kinda fit, because Nus Braka (really odd name, by the way) is later talking about “time with its infinite sense of humor”, which has me wonder if somehow time travel will be a story element.
Eh, people did want an Academy show.Pretty much. I don't recall any petitioning for an Academy series like I did with Strange New Worlds and Legacy. People very much wanted to see an Enterprise with Seven in the captain's chair. They were not clamoring for a show about cadets. That's why the response to the show's previews have been very lukewarm.
Same team as Discover, so expect a lot of disconnect between CGI scenes and what's actually going on.The use of shields here make no sense. Shields are raised almost immediately, yet the ship still takes direct hits which penetrate the hull, causing a ton of damage (which somehow doesn't seem to kill anyone). Trek has been inconsistent regarding deflector shields in the past, but it was always understood that the "real hits" don't get taken until the shields drop down to zero. Here it's treated more like shields hitting 0% means - the ship blows up? I dunno?
Just remember that for 120 years there was no physical academy. The implication being that cadets were being trained on active Starships. Before Discovery arrived 32nd century Starfleet was pragmatic, hawkish and dedicated to one thing, survival. There were no 5 year missions and exploration was in Vance's words "a luxury they could no longer afford'. That probably meant kids had to be trained up to be soldiers and to be able to deal with a hostile galaxy. Real world, hands on experience will always trump book learning and I imagine that Starfleet saw the benefits of this kind of teaching. Risk after all is Starfleet's business.That's not an entire generation. Enterprise was one ship full of cadets. SFA is apparently establishing that the entire Academy student body is traveling on one ship.
They're also indicative of cloaking technology.lso, aren’t Tachyons usually indicative of time travel stuff,
Just remember that for 120 years there was no physical academy. The implication being that cadets were being trained on active Starships. Before Discovery arrived 32nd century Starfleet was pragmatic, hawkish and dedicated to one thing, survival. There were no 5 year missions and exploration was in Vance's words "a luxury they could no longer afford'. That probably meant kids had to be trained up to be soldiers and to be able to deal with a hostile galaxy. Real world, hands on experience will always trump book learning and I imagine that Starfleet saw the benefits of this kind of teaching. Risk after all is Starfleet's business.
The Enterprise in Wrath of Khan was a cadet training ship, and the Republic was spoken of in TOS and DS9 as another such vessel. The Athena is no different. It's a 50 year old part of the lore that SFA has training ships.This clip really exemplified just how horribly designed Discovery Era starships are.
It also shows just why Starfleet Academy was based on a planet instead of a starship.
People very much wanted to see an Enterprise with Seven in the captain's chair.
Republic and Enterprise were training ships. They were not Starfleet Academy itself.The Enterprise in Wrath of Khan was a cadet training ship, and the Republic was spoken of in TOS and DS9 as another such vessel. The Athena is no different. It's a 50 year old part of the lore that SFA has training ships.
Has it been confirmed that that is the case in the new series, or is it just fan speculation?Republic and Enterprise were training ships. They were not Starfleet Academy itself.
The Enterprise in Wrath of Khan was a cadet training ship, and the Republic was spoken of in TOS and DS9 as another such vessel. The Athena is no different. It's a 50 year old part of the lore that SFA has training ships.
Before Discovery arrived 32nd century Starfleet was pragmatic, hawkish and dedicated to one thing, survival. There were no 5 year missions and exploration was in Vance's words "a luxury they could no longer afford'. That probably meant kids had to be trained up to be soldiers and to be able to deal with a hostile galaxy. Real world, hands on experience will always trump book learning and I imagine that Starfleet saw the benefits of this kind of teaching. Risk after all is Starfleet's business.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.