No, some people just don't want Star Trek to be funny. It's serious goddamn business, and a comedy is a wasted story!Agreed. I wonder if part of the issue some have with this episode is that it hits too close to home.
No, some people just don't want Star Trek to be funny. It's serious goddamn business, and a comedy is a wasted story!Agreed. I wonder if part of the issue some have with this episode is that it hits too close to home.
Probably not. It's more Trek as a serious philosophical and contemplative business and comedy episodes don't count. Probably because 10 episode seasons is too thin an episode count to allow such levity.Agreed. I wonder if part of the issue some have with this episode is that it hits too close to home.
No, some people just don't want Star Trek to be funny. It's serious goddamn business, and a comedy is a wasted story!
No, my issue is the plot is too thin - it's too contrived and clearly pieced together for fan service with nothing but Easter eggs and self references, it's not funny or even fun. Worst episode of any star trek ever. Note that that's just my opinion. But that rank seems likely to change one spot after the musical. ..
Probably not. It's more Trek as a serious philosophical and contemplative business and comedy episodes don't count. Probably because 10 episode seasons is too thin an episode count to allow such levity.
Also, LD does not fit neatly in the continuity box.
I'm sure you're not alone on that.I wish there was more than 10 episodes. 13-15 seems to be a sweet spot (Discovery has 13 episode seasons). We're almost done with Season 2 of SNW and it still feels like it just started.
The AMPTP (IE EVERY Studio and their Studio Heads) as a whole is digging their heels in over Streaming Residuals (in the same way they did against ANY increase in Residuals previously; which is why all those who acted in TV series pre 1984 didn't get any residuals past the second/third repeat of an episode. Any series made after that used a higher Residuals formula. They changed it again in 1989 and the last update wasa 2002 for DVDs and some digital media.P+ is digging its heels over paying residuals. You think they're going to spend any more money than necessary?
As someone who's had Cerebral Palsy from birth; I DON'T think it's a 'bad look' at all. He was told UP FRONT that they planed to kill his character off before the end of the season BEFORE he signed up. I think it's a GOOD LOOK that they hired a visually impaired actor to play a blind character, and I don't think the Producers went in with the attitude of 'lets hire a disabled actor and kill his character off for the fun of it.'Funny, I remember being mocked by certain posters that he wasn't really left out of the regular salary his non-disabled coworkers were getting. As a disabled person myself it's a touchy issue for me. Now the story's that he was never promised a regular role. In that case I'll bring back my complaint that it's a bad look for a disabled actor to be pulled out of a regular job on a hit show ("planned ahead of time" or not) and it feels disingenuous that the counter-arguments are that these issues are supposed to be placated with a token guest part.
Or just fun in general. Case in point: the butthurt in some quarters over the upcoming musical episode.No, some people just don't want Star Trek to be funny. It's serious goddamn business, and a comedy is a wasted story!
Glad our pain is providing so much enjoymentOr just fun in general. Case in point: the butthurt in some quarters over the upcoming musical episode.
Your pain nourishes me.Glad our pain is providing so much enjoyment![]()
Glad our pain is providing so much enjoyment![]()
The AMPTP (IE EVERY Studio and their Studio Heads) as a whole is digging their heels in over Streaming Residuals (in the same way they did against ANY increase in Residuals previously; which is why all those who acted in TV series pre 1984 didn't get any residuals past the second/third repeat of an episode. Any series made after that used a higher Residuals formula. They changed it again in 1989 and the last update wasa 2002 for DVDs and some digital media.
Checks out.Your pain nourishes me.![]()
I'll remember that next time you experience some painIt should do someone some good.
Or just fun in general. Case in point: the butthurt in some quarters over the upcoming musical episode.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.