Funny, I remember being mocked by certain posters that he wasn't really left out of the regular salary his non-disabled coworkers were getting. As a disabled person myself it's a touchy issue for me. Now the story's that he was never promised a regular role. In that case I'll bring back my complaint that it's a bad look for a disabled actor to be pulled out of a regular job on a hit show ("planned ahead of time" or not) and it feels disingenuous that the counter-arguments are that these issues are supposed to be placated with a token guest part.I don't recall ever hearing that he'd be back in a regular or non-makeup role, only that Season 1 wasn't the end of his Star Trek career. I think anything more specific was fan speculation.
This bullshit again?Funny, I remember being mocked by certain posters that he wasn't really left out of the regular salary his non-disabled coworkers were getting. As a disabled person myself it's a touchy issue for me. Now the story's that he was never promised a regular role. In that case I'll bring back my complaint that it's a bad look for a disabled actor to be pulled out of a regular job on a hit show ("planned ahead of time" or not) and it feels disingenuous that the counter-arguments are that these issues are supposed to be placated with a token guest part.
Just to go on the record: IMO - They are using Kirk way too much. It seems like Pike is being pushed to the side somewhat.
It's "OK" as long as it isn't the whole thing.So fanwank is OK so long as it isn't taken seriously?
So fanwank is OK so long as it isn't taken seriously?
Indeed. I'm not anti-nostalgia but very much not wanting just nostalgia.It's "OK" as long as it isn't the whole thing.
Indeed. I'm not anti-nostalgia but very much not wanting just nostalgia.
This is going to be one of the most unforgotten episodes in the nearly-sixty year history of Star Trek.
I guarantee you that any convention you go to - if you do that sort of thing - from now until the end of humanity, this episode will be playing somewhere in some programming room and in dozens of hotel rooms and on a bunch of people's personal devices as well as to attract people to merchandise tables. The live-action LD uniforms will be ubiquitous. It's going to be memed and quoted more than "The Trouble With Tribbles." Because it's funny, it's a metacommentary on Star Trek as a whole, and it's about Star Trek fans.
Maybe, it can be true in the context of american culture, but it isn´t the same all around the world.![]()
No, it's going to be true from here to the moons of Nebulon and beyond the Antares maelstrom. Have you not seen Galaxy Quest?
Have you not seen Galaxy Quest?
This is going to be one of the most unforgotten episodes in the nearly-sixty year history of Star Trek.
I guarantee you that any convention you go to - if you do that sort of thing - from now until the end of humanity, this episode will be playing somewhere in some programming room and in dozens of hotel rooms and on a bunch of people's personal devices as well as to attract people to merchandise tables. The live-action LD uniforms will be ubiquitous. It's going to be memed and quoted more than "The Trouble With Tribbles." Because it's funny, it's a metacommentary on Star Trek as a whole, and it's about Star Trek fans.
No, some people just don't want Star Trek to be funny. It's serious goddamn business, and a comedy is a wasted story!Agreed. I wonder if part of the issue some have with this episode is that it hits too close to home.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.