Spoilers Strange New Worlds General Discussion Thread

[fireproof78]

Eh? We already saw it in Such Sweet Sorrow. SNW takes place after SSS, no?

Neither characters are named. Officially, Yeoman Colt does not exist.

Until she's called Yeoman Colt in dialogue I'm assuming she's just an alien crewmember with spikes on her face. The idea that regular human Yeoman Colt suddenly becomes a spiky-faced alien just because is silly even for CBS Trek rebranding and visual retconning standards but hey, I could be wrong. We've seen worse from the producers.

Colt is not addressed as Colt in the Cage or Menagerie either.

 

[The Wormhole]

She's not named in dialogue. In either Strange New Worlds or The Cage.

We're still playing that game, despite the fact the credits, producer and the novel all confirm who it's supposed to be?

In that case is Gul Madred just Cardassian torturer?

 

[Tuskin38]

We're still playing that game, despite the fact the credits, producer and the novel all confirm who it's supposed to be?

In that case is Gul Madred just Cardassian torturer?

Not canon until said on screen, and yes.

 

[fireproof78]

We're still playing that game, despite the fact the credits, producer and the novel all confirm who it's supposed to be?

In that case is Gul Madred just Cardassian torturer?

Yup.

 

[cooleddie74]

He's St. John Talbot. Duh!

 

[Tuskin38]

An artistic teaser taking artistic liberties.

https://twitter.com/StarTrekOnPPlus/status/1514966778073563136

I spotted an Ambassador Class, and Voyager Type 9 shuttles.
Are they not giving their PR team the right assets?? First the Kelvin Constitution and now this.

 

[urbandefault]

He's St. John Gorkon. Duh!

FTFY.

 

[Tuskin38]

Type 9, or maybe Admiral Janeway's shuttle

Gorn

Ambassador

 

[F. King Daniel]

An artistic teaser taking artistic liberties.

https://twitter.com/StarTrekOnPPlus/status/1514966778073563136

I spotted an Ambassador Class, and Voyager Type 9 shuttles.
Are they not giving their PR team the right assets?? First the Kelvin Constitution and now this.

I hope it means continuity has gone entirely out the window and all those things show up as contemporary to the 1701.

Just... imagine.

 

[Mudd]

We're still playing that game,

Why not? The producers will, if they feel like it.

 

[The Wormhole]

I hope it means continuity has gone entirely out the window and all those things show up as contemporary to the 1701.

Just... imagine.

Begun, the Holy Fandom Wars have.

 

[Noname Given]

Begun, the Holy Fandom Wars have.

They started back in 1966 my friend.

 

[Ray Hardgrit]

It's a real shame that an artist hasn't taken every anachronism from the trailers and posters and put them together into one beautiful Strange New Worlds poster.

 

[Nerys Myk]

In my younger days I would roll my eyes at the covers of Star Trek novels that would get the details wrong . Especially when I read the book and era didn't match the uniforms on the cover.

 

[Dryson]

Maybe Star Trek : Undiscovered Worlds would be a better title.

 

[ananta]

Maybe Star Trek : Undiscovered Worlds would be a better title.

“Strange” new worlds does sound a tad judgemental of other planets

 

[UssGlenn]

We're still playing that game, despite the fact the credits, producer and the novel all confirm who it's supposed to be?

In that case is Gul Madred just Cardassian torturer?

If the Discovery credits identify the Spikey alien as Colt, that's fine. But the credits of the Cage and the Menagerie don't ID the Yeoman as Colt, so there is no conflict.

 

[Noname Given]

Maybe Star Trek : Undiscovered Worlds would be a better title.

Funny I don't remember that being in Kirk's opening monologue to TOS.

The reason they chose "Strange New Worlds" as a title is obvious if you ever watched TOS.

 

[plynch]

Why do we think her name is Colt on the Cage and Menag? I thought it was.

 

[Tuskin38]

Why do we think her name is Colt on the Cage and Menag? I thought it was.

Behind the scenes information.

But she's never named or credited in the actual episode.