• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Strange New Worlds General Discussion Thread

I think we get a good idea of who Edith is, what she stands for and why Kirk would be attracted to her. The writers make good use of the "short story" format to convey what the viewer needs to know.

I think the secret to the episode though is we can all empathize with Kirk. What if we had to choose between saving all of mankind, and someone we love? What would we do? Could we make the tough choice?

The particularities of Keeler are less important, as is the dynamics of their relationship.

I dunno. Paradise Syndrome is a take on the same theme. One of our regulars leading a different life. It also ends on a down note. So I can see Kirk in the Inner Light and it hitting in much the same way. TNG and TOS aren't that far apart.

The Paradise Syndrome is a slow-paced (some would say garbage) Season 3 episode though. :) That's my point. TOS could have done it, but if they did, it would be viewed as a mediocre outing. It had to be Stewart's Picard for the full impact.

It's not one of my favorites but I don't understand your reasoning as once they're all in 1930, the story shifts to SHOWING Kirk and Edith falling in love; an Kirk after knowing what must be done to correct the timeline still struggles with it greatly to the point he saves her from falling down a flight of stairs, which would have probably killed her. In the scene where Edith is ultimately killed in the traffic accident; they do a closeup of Kirk's VERY emotional response, and when they been back to the ship Kirk says, "Let's get the hell out of here."
^^^
And I bolded hell because in 1967 that's a word that any network censor would immediately flag - and Networks might get a letter from viewers about - but the line was fought for, and viewed in context of the story, the censors allowed it to be uttered.

CotEoF is DEFINITLY a emotional Kirk centered story about the trauma Kirk went though personally in losing Edith Keeler. It's because of the relationship (however brief it was) that Kirk feels the way he does at the end to utter his final line.

I think you're missing my point here. Character-based writing isn't just about showing emotion. Most romance novels, for example, are full of emotion, but they're railroaded towards a predetermined plot conclusion (the happily ever after) which makes them a plot-based structure, not a character-based one. Character-based writing is when the decisions the protagonist makes are predicated on what's already been established regarding the character.

Again, would Ellison have penned a different story for an alternative TOS helped by Hunter as Pike? I don't think so. Indeed, Ellison started writing the script in March of 1966 - before a single episode with Kirk other than second pilot (The Corbomite Maneuver) was filmed. Ellison couldn't have taken Kirk's personality into account, because he didn't have one yet.

I think the argument you made for TOS S1 CotEoF applies here for anyone who had a close loving relationship with their father. You don't need to know anything from previous episodes about the relationship between Jake and his father Ben Sisko as it's all laid out in the episode.

It wouldn't have worked for Kirk or Picard because neither one of them were dads within the narrative of their shows (though we find out both were absentee fathers later, oddly).

I also disagree that most children would sacrifice their entire lives for the sake of a parent. Indeed, I think few would make the choice Ben does here.
I have never really liked TNG S5 The Inner Light because it's not really a Star Trek episode. It could easily be a Twilight Zone or Outer Limits episode and it would probably have been better served as being on either of those anthology series because at the end, the person involved would have been shown giving up his command to go and TEACH others about the history and culture of this now dead civilization that he had lived an entire full life with.

IMO - It was written by someone who didn't really want to write an actual Star Trek franchise episode because honestly it had very little to do with Star Trek, or any of the TNG characters except as a background setting and minor background characters.

Peter Allan Fields was probably one of the best writers Trek ever had. The man not only wrote The Inner Light, but did the teleplay for Duet, and the story for In The Pale Moonlight.

Pound for pound, there aren't many Trek writers who've been associated with more excellent episodes.
 
Last edited:
For all the non-canon but licensed takes on how Prime Kirk and Spock met written over the past 60 years (including a Shatnerverse novel where I think they meet in a strip club or something like that), I'm not sure ANY Trek fan thought the canon answer would ultimately be them meeting while a descendant of Khan was pining over one and dating the other in a messy romance triangle. (yes they officially met via Uhura but I mean the dramatic circumstances of their early partnership)
 
Last edited:
For all the non-canon but licensed takes on how Prime Kirk and Spock met written over the past 60 years (including a Shatnerverse novel where I think they meet in a strip club or something like that), I'm not sure ANY Trek fan thought the canon answer would ultimately be them meeting while a descendant of Khan was pining over one and dating the other in a messy romance triangle.
Actually, they were introduced to each other by Uhura last season.
 
I think the
For all the non-canon but licensed takes on how Prime Kirk and Spock met written over the past 60 years (including a Shatnerverse novel where I think they meet in a strip club or something like that), I'm not sure ANY Trek fan thought the canon answer would ultimately be them meeting while a descendant of Khan was pining over one and dating the other in a messy romance triangle. (yes they officially met via Uhura but I mean the dramatic circumstances of their early partnership)


Yeah. Kind of strange that they both know La'an and spock has been intimate with her. You would think that finding kahns ship just 5 or 6 years later they wouldn't seem so unversed on the story of Khan. Its almost like they never met La'an and really were surprised in who Khan was and what he did.
 
Yeah. Kind of strange that they both know La'an and spock has been intimate with her. You would think that finding kahns ship just 5 or 6 years later they wouldn't seem so unversed on the story of Khan. Its almost like they never met La'an and really were surprised in who Khan was and what he did.
This is pretty mild considering that Star Wars has Rex and Mon Mothma running around the Rebellion with Luke Skywalker, and who either knew Anakin Skywalker or knew of him. We also know from Andor that Bail and Mon weren't really that close so Bail likely didn't give Mon secret orders to hide Luke's heritage, meaning she should've started raising eyebrows when Luke starts waving around a lightsaber he said was his father's (when it was known that Jedi don't marry) and telling people that his father was killed by another Jedi named Darth Vader, which someone like Rex would immediately point out all the contradictions that story has with his own personal experience with Anakin and Obi-Wan (including that Darth is a title and not a name as Rex would know from the Siege of Mandalore).
 
This is pretty mild considering that Star Wars has Rex and Mon Mothma running around the Rebellion with Luke Skywalker, and who either knew Anakin Skywalker or knew of him. We also know from Andor that Bail and Mon weren't really that close so Bail likely didn't give Mon secret orders to hide Luke's heritage, meaning she should've started raising eyebrows when Luke starts waving around a lightsaber he said was his father's (when it was known that Jedi don't marry) and telling people that his father was killed by another Jedi named Darth Vader, which someone like Rex would immediately point out all the contradictions that story has with his own personal experience with Anakin and Obi-Wan (including that Darth is a title and not a name as Rex would know from the Siege of Mandalore).
This is pretty mild considering that Star Wars has Rex and Mon Mothma running around the Rebellion with Luke Skywalker, and who either knew Anakin Skywalker or knew of him. We also know from Andor that Bail and Mon weren't really that close so Bail likely didn't give Mon secret orders to hide Luke's heritage, meaning she should've started raising eyebrows when Luke starts waving around a lightsaber he said was his father's (when it was known that Jedi don't marry) and telling people that his father was killed by another Jedi named Darth Vader, which someone like Rex would immediately point out all the contradictions that story has with his own personal experience with Anakin and Obi-Wan (including that Darth is a title and not a name as Rex would know from the Siege of Mandalore).

They might have told Luke stories of Anakins adventures.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top