Yeah some tropes really need to be discontinued and this is the biggest one.They're continuing the proud Starfleet tradition of having the comms officer blasted across the room if anything touches any part of the hull.
Yeah some tropes really need to be discontinued and this is the biggest one.They're continuing the proud Starfleet tradition of having the comms officer blasted across the room if anything touches any part of the hull.
There were no window/viewscreens in tos.
Windows are not new technology. Windows are used on current spacecraft. Are we in the Kelvin universe?
Why the fuck do people give weight to trailers? Advertising is always a lie.
So your entire metric for determining the size of and feelings of the entire fanbase is viewership of a youtube upload of a preview scene? That is an extremely flimsy foundation for an argument.Can't even garner a million views after a month.
With content designed to generate views and no substance to back it up. Clickbaits, ragebaits and memes are not an equivalence for comparison.Mid-tier Youtubers collect views bigger than that in a day.
Again. The window/viewscreen combo was conceived for the Kelvinverse. The crew no longer looks at enemies out of a pure viewscreen. They see them mostly through a window and the embedded viewscreen tech is for communication, various tech diagrams main etc. Its no longer what it was in tos or the Berman era shows.
You're welcome. But this kind of thing has been with us since TMP/TWOK. And yes having it here is a "moviefication" of TV. Though even TOS wasn't afraid of a little shake rattle and roll. And yeesh! SPOILERS!!!! (good thing there was a week between episodes!)I knew this kind of pthy reply was coming,
Not only pathetic, but nonexistent.It’s an aesthetic choice. One I actually appreciate. If that’s your argument for what continuity the shows appear in, it’s rather pathetic.
Bro, do you even Star Trek?My complaints are more technical - WHY tf are consoles still exploding in the 31st century??
Again I'm not really making a value judgment, I'm just identifying that a formula exists, that it's been deployed repeatedly in the Kurtzman shows, and that SFA seems from what we know so far to be adhering to it as closely as any of the others.You're welcome. But this kind of thing has been with us since TMP/TWOK. And yes having it here is a "moviefication" of TV. Though even TOS wasn't afraid of a little shake rattle and role. And yeesh! SPOILERS!!!! (good thing there was a week between episodes!)
It’s an aesthetic choice. One I actually appreciate. If that’s your argument for what continuity the shows appear in, it’s rather pathetic.
It serves the purpose as in TOS with one additional feature.Again. The window/viewscreen combo was conceived for the Kelvinverse. The crew no longer looks at enemies out of a pure viewscreen. They see them mostly through a window and the embedded viewscreen tech is for communication, various tech diagrams main etc. Its no longer what it was in tos or the Berman era shows.
Its only "pathetic" to you because you disagree with me. It was a choice built from the Kelvin universe. Thats it. All the tech was upped and more advanced than things we saw in any trek before. They even went out of their way to change the size and shape of the windowscreen from what we saw in the size of the viewscreen in tos.
It's been there since the second pilot. Why change now?Yeah some tropes really need to be discontinued and this is the biggest one.
Because the Enterprise never had a widescreen Main Viewer before 2009 --Its only "pathetic" to you because you disagree with me. It was a choice built from the Kelvin universe. Thats it. All the tech was upped and more advanced than things we saw in any trek before. They even went out of their way to change the size and shape of the windowscreen from what we saw in the size of the viewscreen in tos.
That's TMP. Different canon and EnterpriseBecause the Enterprise never had a widescreen Main Viewer before 2009 --
![]()
Oh.

You wont find anything because they are viewscreens not windows. Lol
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.