• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starfleet Academy General Discussion Thread

There were no window/viewscreens in tos.
MCV6oeI.jpeg
 
Windows are not new technology. Windows are used on current spacecraft. Are we in the Kelvin universe?

Why the fuck do people give weight to trailers? Advertising is always a lie.

Again. The window/viewscreen combo was conceived for the Kelvinverse. The crew no longer looks at enemies out of a pure viewscreen. They see them mostly through a window and the embedded viewscreen tech is for communication, various tech diagrams main etc. Its no longer what it was in tos or the Berman era shows.
 
Can't even garner a million views after a month.
So your entire metric for determining the size of and feelings of the entire fanbase is viewership of a youtube upload of a preview scene? That is an extremely flimsy foundation for an argument.

You fail to factor in; not everyone wants to watch youtube videos these days since they are often infested with unskippable ads, not everyone wants to watch a preview and tries to avoid spoilers, older fans who don't use youtube, and people who don't live online and might not even be aware of its existence.

You offer no solid case.
Mid-tier Youtubers collect views bigger than that in a day.
With content designed to generate views and no substance to back it up. Clickbaits, ragebaits and memes are not an equivalence for comparison.
 
Again. The window/viewscreen combo was conceived for the Kelvinverse. The crew no longer looks at enemies out of a pure viewscreen. They see them mostly through a window and the embedded viewscreen tech is for communication, various tech diagrams main etc. Its no longer what it was in tos or the Berman era shows.

It’s an aesthetic choice. One I actually appreciate. If that’s your argument for what continuity the shows appear in, it’s rather pathetic.
 
I knew this kind of pthy reply was coming,
You're welcome. But this kind of thing has been with us since TMP/TWOK. And yes having it here is a "moviefication" of TV. Though even TOS wasn't afraid of a little shake rattle and roll. And yeesh! SPOILERS!!!! (good thing there was a week between episodes!)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
You're welcome. But this kind of thing has been with us since TMP/TWOK. And yes having it here is a "moviefication" of TV. Though even TOS wasn't afraid of a little shake rattle and role. And yeesh! SPOILERS!!!! (good thing there was a week between episodes!)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Again I'm not really making a value judgment, I'm just identifying that a formula exists, that it's been deployed repeatedly in the Kurtzman shows, and that SFA seems from what we know so far to be adhering to it as closely as any of the others.

I think it'd be hard to disagree that these common traits and plot beats between the streaming shows exist, whatever people think of them, in the same way that someone could reasonably see a preview for a TNG episode and accurately say "oh, they're doing the 'crew find an anomaly, Picard calls a lengthy briefing, Troi senses pain, Data fixes it with technobabble' plot again."
 
It’s an aesthetic choice. One I actually appreciate. If that’s your argument for what continuity the shows appear in, it’s rather pathetic.

Its only "pathetic" to you because you disagree with me. It was a choice built from the Kelvin universe. Thats it. All the tech was upped and more advanced than things we saw in any trek before. They even went out of their way to change the size and shape of the windowscreen from what we saw in the size of the viewscreen in tos.
 
Again. The window/viewscreen combo was conceived for the Kelvinverse. The crew no longer looks at enemies out of a pure viewscreen. They see them mostly through a window and the embedded viewscreen tech is for communication, various tech diagrams main etc. Its no longer what it was in tos or the Berman era shows.
It serves the purpose as in TOS with one additional feature.

This is a stupid argument because a window is not new technology that defines an era.
 
Its only "pathetic" to you because you disagree with me. It was a choice built from the Kelvin universe. Thats it. All the tech was upped and more advanced than things we saw in any trek before. They even went out of their way to change the size and shape of the windowscreen from what we saw in the size of the viewscreen in tos.

No, it’s pathetic because you choose to base your enjoyment about a series on choices based on what things look like as opposed to what actually occurs in the series. You dismiss an entire era of a franchise you claim to enjoy because of aesthetics. In other words, you judge a book by its cover.
 
Its only "pathetic" to you because you disagree with me. It was a choice built from the Kelvin universe. Thats it. All the tech was upped and more advanced than things we saw in any trek before. They even went out of their way to change the size and shape of the windowscreen from what we saw in the size of the viewscreen in tos.
Because the Enterprise never had a widescreen Main Viewer before 2009 --

tmp-de-bluray-1673.jpg

Oh.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top