True, it should be a show with mainly Chinese, Indian and African humans, if you want to represent Earth's population. But I bet you are not thinking of them.Its unrealistic representation wise per the population numbers. Its not accurate at all.
True, it should be a show with mainly Chinese, Indian and African humans, if you want to represent Earth's population. But I bet you are not thinking of them.Its unrealistic representation wise per the population numbers. Its not accurate at all.
Yeah, the elephant in the room here is that SNW has completely retconned Vulcan culture and physiology in terms of mating. There is literally no point to Pon Farr now, and since Spock can apparently bang T'Pring whenever, there should be no buildup of pent up energy or whatever that results in a 'mate or die' insanity every seven years. This is one aspect where SNW has kind of 'wrecked it' in terms of what was established.
Can't believe I actually understand that reference.
Oh. Um...I was pointing out that she made a choice on the fly based on optimal outcomes beneficial to her - suggesting she maybe didn't want Spock to die either and took the opportunity presented. KIRK. Which by Spock's own admission was flawlessly logical. Don't think I ever asserted it to be a moral or ethical choice. Only that it served her purpose which, I was suggesting was to prevent either of the Vulcan men from dying.Okay? I don't follow what the point of bringing up Kirk was then. T'Pring was clearly okay with someone dying to avoid being married to Spock.
True, it should be a show with mainly Chinese, Indian and African humans, if you want to represent Earth's population. But I bet you are not thinking of them.
Only if you are talking about "Discovery" and "Picard."
Based off what we've seen with both Spock and Michael, Sybok probably rejected logic pretty early and it's probably in reaction to Sarek. Michael traumatized herself trying to please him, Spock didn't speak to him for years, and Sybok is a criminal turned cult leader.Sybok's presented here in SNW as having already rejected logic. It might have been more interesting to do a storyline where he's a fully logical Vulcan, and whatever traumatic events happen in Strange New Worlds break him and turn him into the emotional religious fanatic we see in the movie. Oh well...
There might be another formal ceremony yet to come. Right now they are engaged but in Amok Time she's more than a fiancee, less than a wife. After this other unnamed ceremony no more backing out with finger swipes
But the Pon Farr in TOS was Spock‘s first. Didn’t he say, he hoped he might skip it due to his human heritage?If SNW goes with the one-season-is-one-year convention, we're due for a Pon Farr in season two. It would track if that was some kind of level-up year with a ceremony that moves T'Pring into that "more than a fiancee, almost a wife" status.
SNIP!
Perhaps Angel will become a recurring villain? However we see that Angel is a three dimensional villain rather than a two dimensional one so I hope that this character will continue to develop in such a way and become a well rounded abstract antagonist. Maybe sometimes Angel can be good, and other times can be bad? I love how Angel took over the Enterprise bridge with such glee and ease accompanied by villainous laughter and sass!
SNIP!
Yeah, the elephant in the room here is that SNW has completely retconned Vulcan culture and physiology in terms of mating. There is literally no point to Pon Farr now, and since Spock can apparently bang T'Pring whenever, there should be no buildup of pent up energy or whatever that results in a 'mate or die' insanity every seven years. This is one aspect where SNW has kind of 'wrecked it' in terms of what was established.
But the Pon Farr in TOS was Spock‘s first. Didn’t he say, he hoped he might skip it due to his human heritage?
OTOH, Spock explicitly mentions Vulcan's aggressive colonizing period. While the Vulcans of Archer's time may have scaled things back, adapting the "Prime Directive" approach in keeping with Surakian philosophies, the older colonies would still be there.ENT explicitly established that they didn't do the space-settler-colonialism thing en masse. And by the 2350s, Federation space should have expanded far beyond even the furthest 22nd Century Vulcan colony.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.