Glad to see Tom doing his job for a change![]()
I'm still waiting for my raise! LOL
16 episodes in and I still marvel at Lt. James big boobs.
Yes, Lt. Tittties always makes me stand at attention.
Glad to see Tom doing his job for a change![]()
I'm still waiting for my raise! LOL
16 episodes in and I still marvel at Lt. James big boobs.
If you are referring to the sarcophagus there was at least one side effect. Prolonged use turns the user into an ego-maniacal sociopath bent on universal domination.
Granted, but won't a single exposure "fix" everything that's wrong?
I'm still wondering why Daniel had to keep his glasses. (Actually, given the number of times when both he and Rush seem to function quite well without them, I wonder about the entire issue. As a spectacle-American myself, I'm useless without my specs.)
I've known people who don't need glasses for anything else (my mother being one of them) but if she didn't have reading glasses on she'd get a headache when she read a book.
I'm wondering if when you use the stones, there is some kind of offscreen briefing and agreement along the lines of "look here is what you can or cannot do with this body"
It seems like something that should be addressed, because when you have people body swapping back to earth and visiting wives/boyfriends etc... this is gonna come up.
I really don't get the controversy angle here. Did Wray use the woman's body in a previous episode to have sex with her partner? Was that made clear? If so how come no uproar over that? So it is okay for a lesbian to use another woman's body to have lesbian sex (considering the host may or may not have been gay) but not okay for a straight woman to use a lesbian woman's body for hetero sex..
Both actions seem pretty morally questionable to me.
Also there was no uproar over Young using Telford's body for sex.
And honestly I can understand Little Miss Brilliant going for it with Rush. Nobody ever said she was some perfectly moral heroic type. She saw her chance and she took it. Rush was a good guy and recognized that it was wrong (along with his dead wife issues)
Well, the episode sucked.You still... like... actually watch the show? We are probably going to have to agree to disagree, and I mean no disrespect but that entire post seemed to be:
"I hate this, I hate that, I really hate that, the robots ok, now back to hate."
Sadly the TV landscape is pretty barren... especially at the tail end of the week. Besides, what makes you think that trashing bad TV doesn't make me happy?It just seems like you'd be a happier person to go watch something you enjoy.
I guess that's what they're saying it's like... but if you're designing a ship that's ridiculously redundant and flying through the universe on its own... it seems that you would do it another way.Anyway, they weren't going to make it before the sabotage occurred, and the sabotage didn't fix the problem it actually made it worse by disabling the FTL. From what I could tell the FTL drives work kind of like a string of christmas lights. (or atleast the old ones) You break one bulb, the whole string won't light up. But, if you cut that socket out entirely, and reconnect the severed wire, the string will light up again.
I could be wrong though.
I'm wondering if when you use the stones, there is some kind of offscreen briefing and agreement along the lines of "look here is what you can or cannot do with this body"
It seems like something that should be addressed, because when you have people body swapping back to earth and visiting wives/boyfriends etc... this is gonna come up.
I really don't get the controversy angle here. Did Wray use the woman's body in a previous episode to have sex with her partner? Was that made clear? If so how come no uproar over that? So it is okay for a lesbian to use another woman's body to have lesbian sex (considering the host may or may not have been gay) but not okay for a straight woman to use a lesbian woman's body for hetero sex..
Both actions seem pretty morally questionable to me.
Also there was no uproar over Young using Telford's body for sex.
And honestly I can understand Little Miss Brilliant going for it with Rush. Nobody ever said she was some perfectly moral heroic type. She saw her chance and she took it. Rush was a good guy and recognized that it was wrong (along with his dead wife issues)
No Colonel Telford's body was used by Colonel Young and Telford knew because of the FTL transition glitch.Maybe it wasn't a big deal on Trek BBS but on other boards the rape of Colonel Telford and Chloe going out drinking with Airman Xs body was the biggest discussion of season 1.0. As everybody loaded up to protest the so-called "Gatefail" episode which Sabotage was.
As for Wray she had a home visit and kissed and they skipped to breakfast the next morning as opposed to Scott pumping James in the closet at Icarus and Young's wife riding on top of Telford/Young
Having James swap, panic a bit and pull out of the situation saying "I can't do this!" was also a nice touch. Forgot to mention that. I actually felt for her while all that was happening.I liked the way they used the stones this week. Seeing Camile having to endure time in a disabled body was both attention grabbing and gut-wrenching.
Agreed. They handled this storyline quite well, which was a welcome change from the way the stones were used in season 1.0.
In Camile's case, I got the impression that the woman who volunteered for the swap consented to, and was prepped for what was about to happen.I'm wondering if when you use the stones, there is some kind of offscreen briefing and agreement along the lines of "look here is what you can or cannot do with this body"
It seems like something that should be addressed, because when you have people body swapping back to earth and visiting wives/boyfriends etc... this is gonna come up.
I really don't get the controversy angle here. Did Wray use the woman's body in a previous episode to have sex with her partner? Was that made clear? If so how come no uproar over that? So it is okay for a lesbian to use another woman's body to have lesbian sex (considering the host may or may not have been gay) but not okay for a straight woman to use a lesbian woman's body for hetero sex.."
It was funny, shocking, hot and I'm sure Telford didn't mind one bit.Also there was no uproar over Young using Telford's body for sex.
Hopefully this body-swap technology will allow her to be able to do it some day.And honestly I can understand Little Miss Brilliant going for it with Rush.
charging platesThey finally answer how everyone has managed basic grooming (they all have electric razors...which I assume will never see their batteries empty or their blades go dull, but, whatever).
charging platesThey finally answer how everyone has managed basic grooming (they all have electric razors...which I assume will never see their batteries empty or their blades go dull, but, whatever).![]()
The bodyswapping issue was actually adressed in the Kino webisode "We Volunteer To Do This".
People sign legal forms in which they agree to temporarily loan their body for "personal stuff" like "visiting husbands and wives". These forms don't explicitly mention sex, but everybody who participates in the communication stone program seems to be aware of that possibility.
http://stargate.mgm.com/view/character/171/index.html
Who the hell would sign away their body in such a way? Who in the hell would have sex with some random person's body, even if their loved one was running the show so to speak. Who the hell would have sex with a loved one using someone else's body? Ok, granted, some people would probably be into that sort of thing... but even so, how in the fuck would air force policy condone it, and seemingly encourage it? It's completely absurd.
"Yes, I know you love key lime pie, but we told you Cpl. Danvers is allergic to citrus. Now he's in the hospital. Nice job."
On the glasses thing:
Yes, but the writers have been very inconsistent. There have been times when Daniel needed them to see clearly far off things, and there were times he needed them to see clearly things close to him (yeah, bifocals are possible) but there were all those other times when he didn't have access to the glasses and seemed to operate perfectly well at either distance or up close.
It was very inconsistently handled. So much so that it could be argued that the writers screwed up that point of Daniel's vision just like writers screwed up any definitive statement of what deck Kirk's cabin is on, or where the engineering room really is.
They just don't take into account fandom's rabid demand for detail and precision.
I want to know why they completely abandoned the storyline that was looking into this very topic (ie, with Young, his ex?-wife, and whatshisface).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.