A plus is just an X with superior posture.
I think you mean Abraham Erskine but would that mean the Abomination's serum was done before Captain America's? Erskine died after Capt's transformation, so how could he develop the Abomination's serum after?And of course "Dr. Reinstein" was the code name of Dr. Alexander Erskine.
What I took from the story is that they tried to reverse engineer the serum, and replaced the Vita Rays with Gamma Rays. The serum wasn't identical, and the rays weren't identical, and the results were problematic.Right, Abraham.
The serum may have been the same, but the missing ingredient was the vita-rays. Banner tried to recreate them using gamma radiation, and we know how that turned out. I assume the same happened with Blonsky, that the serum didn't have the right effect when it wasn't combined with vita-rays in the correct way.
Right, Abraham.
The serum may have been the same, but the missing ingredient was the vita-rays. Banner tried to recreate them using gamma radiation, and we know how that turned out. I assume the same happened with Blonsky, that the serum didn't have the right effect when it wasn't combined with vita-rays in the correct way.
I agree with the article in a human standpoint, but still have doubts about Ward. I think he wanted Lorelei to take him over, that's why he didn't want to shoot.Meanwhile, over at thinkprogress.org, Betsy Phillips addresses the issue of depiction of consent in "Yes Men".
Meanwhile, over at thinkprogress.org, Betsy Phillips addresses the issue of depiction of consent in "Yes Men".
May isn't mentioned in that article.Meanwhile, over at thinkprogress.org, Betsy Phillips addresses the issue of depiction of consent in "Yes Men".
That piece totally misrepresented/misunderstood why May was unhappy with Ward. May wasn't unhappy with Ward because Lorelei had raped him. May was unhappy with Ward because he conceded that he'd just "settled" for May.
May isn't mentioned in that article.Meanwhile, over at thinkprogress.org, Betsy Phillips addresses the issue of depiction of consent in "Yes Men".
That piece totally misrepresented/misunderstood why May was unhappy with Ward. May wasn't unhappy with Ward because Lorelei had raped him. May was unhappy with Ward because he conceded that he'd just "settled" for May.
Sorry, yes, I was looking for "May."May isn't mentioned in that article.That piece totally misrepresented/misunderstood why May was unhappy with Ward. May wasn't unhappy with Ward because Lorelei had raped him. May was unhappy with Ward because he conceded that he'd just "settled" for May.
Yeah, she is. Misspelled as "Mae" and also mentioned as Ward's "lover". As I said, May even asked Ward if Lorelei was right about Ward's feelings or lack thereof, and Ward conceded that it was true. The piece is also wrong that May just took Lorelei at her word, at least once she got over being mad at him.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.