But he's so intelligent, who would not like his brain?I stopped trusting my opinion when I realized I liked "Spock's Brain." What the hell is wrong with me?
But he's so intelligent, who would not like his brain?I stopped trusting my opinion when I realized I liked "Spock's Brain." What the hell is wrong with me?
I like the first two seasons way more than S3-S5.The last time I did a series rewatch of Disco, I found season 1 had the tightest scripts and story arc. It helped they broke up the narrative into three sub-arcs, rather than their later achilles heel of stretching out a movie's worth of plot over 13 episodes.

They didn't have it in the 23rd century either, Scotty clearly didn't have access to it.looking at the clips for this show one thing is clear:
They clearly don't have Ozempic in the 32nd century, (or Gyms)
I think you are right in your argument in the different tones between DISCO and TOS. I have been watching TOS and it like TNG mostly sits in the middle. You can have it switch to a darker or lighter tone depending whats going on. The mudd episode even with the content still felt more middle to lighter tone.Alright, I'll ask it a different way - do you think DSC was tonally distinct from TOS, or do you think the two shows are more or less identical?
If they are different, how was this difference developed, conveyed, and presented by the DSC writers?
yes, well awareStar Trek has never done that though. Star Trek is not the Godfather, it is not Shakespeare, hell it isn't even always as progressive as MASH or Night Court. It has always done the update thing, from TMP, to TNG, to DS9 to First Contact, and onwards.
It isn't a period piece but a speculative future from a contemporary frame work.
They didn't have it in the 23rd century either, Scotty clearly didn't have access to it.
no he didn't did he?
You just can’t help yourself, can you? Warning for trolling and ignoring moderator instructions. I’ll also issue a thread ban. Comments to PM.no he didn't did he?
![]()
I’m going to be charitable and assume you missed that I said this tangent was over. But again, let’s all give this topic a rest. Thank you.They didn't have it in the 23rd century either, Scotty clearly didn't have access to it.
If I watch a medieval show i don't want to hear contemporary language, for example, i want to hear language that is consistent and completes the fantasy...
Why would homophobia come into it?I have no doubt that the ignorant comments about Jesse are due to nothing but brain dead homophobia.
Why would homophobia come into it?
I have no doubt that the ignorant comments about Jesse are due to nothing but brain dead homophobia. I mean, the person behind the comments has already shown the entire board who they really are more than once. When someone shows you who they are, you should believe them the first time.
The pew pew in old like TNG had a bit of story and character ties to it. Though later in DS9 and voyager it seemed less so.I do think there's an argument that live action Trek in the modern era has been a bit too narrowly focused in terms of tone. DIS, PIC, SNW, and now perhaps SFA all are in part rooted in effects-laden action adventure. While it's nice that such effects are possible, I do think it's been to the detriment of the "space drama" side of Trek at times.
I don't come to Trek for pew-pew. I can get pew-pew anywhere. That said, I don't mind it, I just think that everything since ST09 has to a large extent treated Trek as mostly an action franchise, which I think is quite wrong.
The pew pew in old like TNG had a bit of story and character ties to it. Though later in DS9 and voyager it seemed less so.
What bothers me to this day about phasers is that none of them have any safeties installed in them.I.miss the old phasers beans from TOS, TNG and all Berman Trek. The star wars style laser bolts are not star trek. The phaser beam was cool
They're not real. They'll have safeties when the plot decides they have safeties.What bothers me to this day about phasers is that none of them have any safeties installed in them.
A child could technically vaporize themselves if they got their hands on one.
What bothers me to this day about phasers is that none of them have any safeties installed in them.
A child could technically vaporize themselves if they got their hands on one.
Same thing with seatbelts and other emergency equipment. Manual overrides might even work!They're not real. They'll have safeties when the plot decides they have safeties.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.