What is an example of "masterfully done?"Well, fan service is fan service no matter what you call it, but there is fan service that is poorly done and fan service that can be masterfully done.
What is an example of "masterfully done?"Well, fan service is fan service no matter what you call it, but there is fan service that is poorly done and fan service that can be masterfully done.
You have an elderly Admiral played by Dee Kelley showing up in “Encounter At Farpoint” vs Scotty played by Jimmy Doohan showing up in “Relics”.What is an example of "masterfully done?"
To clarify, those are masterfully done?You have an elderly Admiral played by Dee Kelley showing up in “Encounter At Farpoint” vs Scotty played by Jimmy Doohan showing up in “Relics”.
One is. One isn’t.To clarify, those are masterfully done?
I will take your word for it.One is. One isn’t.
The one in Farpoint is subtle. Dee’s in old age make up, No calls him “McCoy”, He doesn’t like transporters and makes a comment about “pointed ears”. So viewers in the know can connect the dots and figure out who he is. For the rest it’s just a case of “Who’s that little old man?” Scotty showing up, (and Sarek and Spock) has much more fanfare. “Sarek” is a fine episode. “Unification” a middling one. As is “Relics”.I will take your word for it.
The real question is why would he know? Being an admiral doesn't make you magically omniscient.
I suppose it would stop being relevant if it wasn't still relevant due to it happening so much.It's a joke from South Park that was funny in the episode it was introduced in, but hasn't been since.
There is a lot of potential for that story, especially given the way Sarek and Spock's reaction to their relationship in TOS vs. his relationship Burnham.Is there a better explanation for Burnham being Spocks sister than "memberberries" for instance.
There is no inconsistency about it. You're comparing situations that are apples to oranges, for a valid comparison the situations need to be identical.It could be. Although that would be a major frigging inconsistency that lasted decades. Hopefully, there's actually a logical plot point behind it.
Actually if it's well known how much Picard despised Ro for her defection (and going by Shaw's lines it seems people very much do gossip about Picard), I can see the opposite, people actually going out of their way to keep her re-entry into Starfleet from him.I find it implausible that one of the most powerful, important admirals in all of Starfleet wouldn't at some point learn that one of his former closest officers, whom he spent years mentoring, had rejoined Starfleet. If nothing else, that seems like the sort of thing that would inspire someone to tell him out of personal loyalty.
And the five we don’t know about.They gave us Sybok in 1989 and they're bringing him back in SNW so it seems Spock's secret siblings are just a thing in Trek since the Eighties. And if anything it's shown that Sarek is a pretty lousy parent to all of his three kids, just in different ways.
Actually if it's well known how much Picard despised Ro for her defection (and going by Shaw's lines it seems people very much do gossip about Picard), I can see the opposite, people actually going out of their way to keep her re-entry into Starfleet from him.
I watched that a few days ago and it's funny how many of the criticisms of current shows are to be found in it.They gave us Sybok in 1989 and they're bringing him back in SNW so it seems Spock's secret siblings are just a thing in Trek since the Eighties. And if anything it's shown that Sarek is a pretty lousy parent to all of his three kids, just in different ways.
Why? Starfleet is a military organization. And Ro was assigned to spywork in Starfleet Intelligence. Unless Picard has a reason to know, there's no reason for anyone to tell him and doing so might in fact compromise whatever spy mission Ro is on.There's no way somebody wouldn't tell him. He has too many allies within Starfleet, even with his falling out.
I find it implausible that one of the most powerful, important admirals in all of Starfleet wouldn't at some point learn that one of his former closest officers, whom he spent years mentoring, had rejoined Starfleet. If nothing else, that seems like the sort of thing that would inspire someone to tell him out of personal loyalty.
I watched that a few days ago and it's funny how many of the criticisms of current shows are to be found in it.
Dark tones, Bladerunner/Mad Maxx style settings, surprise family members, phaser machine guns, Federation officials smoking fags.
Like the modern shows it's also not as bad as made out (except no need for surprise family members)
Which is an interesting story to tell and one worth exploring. Spock is held up as "Mr. Star Trek" at times, the iconic character of the franchise and sometimes a person to emulate. Except, Sarek actually messed up pretty good, and his childhood was not a good one, even by human standards. What makes Spock different is very well informed by exploring Sarek and his children as characters.They gave us Sybok in 1989 and they're bringing him back in SNW so it seems Spock's secret siblings are just a thing in Trek since the Eighties. And if anything it's shown that Sarek is a pretty lousy parent to all of his three kids, just in different ways.
And Shatner's ego.it’s actually much better than made out, and the problem — said ever — is executive meddling, time, and money.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.