And also the United Earth Alliance/Coalition of Planets and later the Federation classified Romulan cloaks from all but those who had to see the information. Since Kirk and his crew were never on a need-to-know-basis they never knew it existed.
That's a good point. The use of the word "over" is pretty indicative that the age is up there and considered past the retirement age. Don't you agree, Jim? *nudge-nudge*I always kinda-sorta figured Marrow was being somewhat gracious with Kirk about the ships age.
He knew she was a lot older, but dropped a decade off so as not to offhand indicate that it might be time for Kirk to be put out to pasture as well.
His comments about how the Enterprise is a beautiful lady and she'll always bring you home etc. have always made me wonder if the cameo was originally written for Scotty and they had to improvise because Doohan was unavailable.
Actually, it seems that YOU don't need more legacy characters added to the mix.With SNW, you've already got that kind of link pre-baked into things with Pike, Spock, and Una; you don't need to add more legacy characters solely because they have a history of association with the original Enterprise.
When did you bring that up? I just did a search, and this post is the only time you have posted anything in the Future of Trek forum using the terms Miles, Keiko, Cordelia, Wesley or Angel. So I'm not sure what exactly it is you're trying to say right now.Fine. If mentioning cameos was a poor example to use in clarifying why I see a difference between DSC's nods to the past and what SNW is doing, how about my bringing up the inclusion of Miles and Keiko O'Brien, or, outside of Star Trek, the inclusion of Cordelia and Wesley in ANGEL?
If ya really think about it, by benching the Enterprise (without offering Kirk another ship), Star Fleet WAS essentially putting him out to pasture.That's a good point. The use of the word "over" is pretty indicative that the age is up there and considered past the retirement age. Don't you agree, Jim? *nudge-nudge*
I knew it was a ratings stunt, but I never thought it was cheap.And then there's Worf, who many fans both in 1995 and even now say was brought onto DS9 to help invigorate the show and improve its ratings as a cheap stunt.
Honestly, they should have given him a starbase command.If ya really think about it, by benching the Enterprise (without offering Kirk another ship), Star Fleet WAS essentially putting him out to pasture.
Maybe they didn't take the metallic reflective shine off the bridge but it's smaller, they got rid of the service walkways behind the stations and there's a lot more bright TOS-style color. I love it.
Burnham was at least interesting.
I think that is up for debate.![]()
Debate! That's what this board is for... it's why we're here!
FIGHT!Debate! That's what this board is for... it's why we're here!
Naturally.I think that is up for debate.![]()
Who pissed off Sulu?FIGHT!
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.