But the casts were both strengths for the other two shows
Really? You think the cast of characters on Discovery is a strength for the show?
But the casts were both strengths for the other two shows
I doubt it was just that as both problems are easily solved. Sets can be redressed/repurposed, and indeed already have been. The Shenzhou's bridge was turned into the command centre on the Section 31 ship is season 2, Disco's bridge was a Starfleet bridge in Picard. As for the cast, American Horror Story holds onto many of the same actors and recasts them as different characters in each season, there's no reason why a Star Trek anthology series couldn't do likewise.the anthology series was nixed because of the high costs for sets/cast and it's too frequent turnover I believe.
For sure.Absolutely.
It's the strongest cast of any Star Trek show. By far.
American Horror Story holds onto many of the same actors and recasts them as different characters in each season, there's no reason why a Star Trek anthology series couldn't do likewise.
Oh, definitely.With how pedantic most of Trek fandom is and the often total refusal to accept real world reasons for production and stylistic changes, i can't see this idea as being anything other than total nightmare.
No it actually doesn't. Spock would either become overprotective, or look for ways around the "destiny." It would make more sense that Pike kept it to himself, as he was told it was for him alone.
Ok, potential for drama and making sense are not necessarily the same thing. So, no I don't think it makes sense.I disagree. The potential for drama is too great. The show won't pass that up. Spock will probably find out through a mindmeld. Pike will make him swear not to do anything....Spock might even feign getting the memory erased....then at the end of the ep we see him starting a program called "Talos Project".
See my above post about "doing it right*"
*right being defined as "I can't describe it but I know it when I see it" AKA the Star Trek paradox.
Yes, those are the best possible solutions. Because then they will make something entertaining and potentially fun.Then, there is nothing that we can call as "right", according to your own statement. Because you can't even describe what "Right" that you're talking about. the best solution will "No more Star Trek", or "Make a good Star Trek that the studio thinks 'right'. and ignore your preference.
Except for Parks and Recreation, every show I've watched in the past decade-plus has been serialized. From the beginning. Every show you listed is from the '90s.
people have to behave like people.I really hope it's got a different tone and feel from the other Orci/Kurtzman Star Trek shows. IMO I wouldn't like it very much if it's got that same "Shock value" tone Picard and Discovery had with people cursing and gratuitousness
Last video that came up in my YouTube recommendations was about how SNW is a sign that both discovery and Picard have failed.Have the Negative-Nelly's given up on the 'Star Trek Is Sure to be Cancelled' rumors yet?
I've kinda lost track.
Because of course, when two TV shows fail, the next obvious step is to do another spin-off. But then, I suppose that does track with Midnight's Edge's logic.Last video that came up in my YouTube recommendations was about how SNW is a sign that both discovery and Picard have failed.
Because of course, when two TV shows fail, the next obvious step is to do another spin-off. But then, I suppose that does track with Midnight's Edge's logic.
I am both stunned and yet unsurprised.Last video that came up in my YouTube recommendations was about how SNW is a sign that both discovery and Picard have failed.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.