I mean... There's a lot of problems with that line in general...
Like... Did they just forget terraforming is a thing?
The Post-Burn Galaxy thread or "Post-Apocalypse or Slightly Used?"
- Thread starter CT_Phipps
- Start date
Like... Did they just forget terraforming is a thing?
Could be - in the way modern earth is pushing back against destroying grassland/forest for urbanisation/industry for environmental reasons - that in the Trek universe they have deemed terraforming to be a practice that should not be carried outI mean... There's a lot of problems with that line in general...
Like... Did they just forget terraforming is a thing?
I mean... There's a lot of problems with that line in general...
Like... Did they just forget terraforming is a thing?
Terraforming may not be an option when the entire galaxy is on fire.
But yes, I have no trouble believing all Klingon worlds were rendered uninhabitable...if the premise of the episode is finding a new homeworld.
If you had other worlds, you wouldn't need one.
No, the Klingons were Quarianed or BSGed.
They live in a universe where Terraforming an entire planet only requires a toddler sized device.
Yeah but Star Trek functions on the premise of, "We can do this thing in this episode that will never ever show up again and not solve the problem in the next episode. TNG's terraforming was a multi-year process that involved lots and lots of machines rather than the Genesis device that they at least invented a thing that made it unstable."
Similar threads
