• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Strange New Worlds General Discussion Thread

I think my one concern with them using "legacy' characters, i.e., the ones that end up on Kirks Enterprise, is that there's no real risk or sense of danger for the character. We know that they make it, so if anything occurs, we know that the outcome will be always be positive for them.
People always say things like that, but really, on nearly every TV show you know the main cast is always going to have a "positive" outcome and that there's no real risk to them. The only time there's a chance of anything different is if the actor is leaving and that is always made public well in advance of the episode airing. Even shows which have a high turn-over rate among their main cast like Game of Thrones or The Walking Dead usually only write characters off in certain key episodes like the premieres, finales, or midseason stories. You still go through a majority of the episodes knowing everything will turn out okay.
 
By season four, you pretty much knew who on GoT had "plot armor" until the final group of episodes.
 
So far...I like Strange New Worlds so much that I immediately watch it again after first seeing it. And then again the following day. I do the same with Lower Decks, too.

I can't say that I have done with Discovery or Picard. I honestly think there's something to be said about adhering to the an episodic format; with a beginning, middle, and end. It just feels so complete and satisfying. I feel like I've actually gotten somewhere.
 
Loved the ep, but something puzzles me.

Where did the Shepherd ship come from? I know, advanced tech. but it was suddenly there, no warning. no "Captain, I'm detecting an energy surge!" or "Captain, a surface launch!" Just BAM!
 
In the last fifteen years I've rewatched maybe ten Trek episodes, most - not all - TOS.

I've seen each of the SNW episodes multiple times from beginning to end, and dipped into a number of scenes more times than that.
 
Until now the only CBS Trek I've made a habit of repeatedly rewatching as a lump collection of episodes was Season 1 of PIC. SNW is so far guaranteeing I'll be doing the same for it.
 
Where did the Shepherd ship come from? I know, advanced tech. but it was suddenly there, no warning. no "Captain, I'm detecting an energy surge!" or "Captain, a surface launch!" Just BAM!

They're shorthanding a fair amount of that stuff, since we know and expect it by now. An approaching ship is not necessarily worth a dramatic beat in and of itself.

This show really does assume that the viewer knows all about Star Trek.
 
280824144-384905120318102-674576771105689944-n.jpg
 
If people are fans of this or any other new shows and have twitter it wouldn't be a bad idea to comment on Alex Kurtzman and other creative's timeline and tell them or show them some love. Just happened to see some suggested tweets from Kurtzman and pretty much every comment on all his posts is a personal attack. People are even attacking Strange New Worlds and blaming him for ruining it. I haven't seen anything positive.
 
By season four, you pretty much knew who on GoT had "plot armor" until the final group of episodes.

The reason for that is D&D ran out of books (well, not really - Season 5 was based upon books, but they ignored a lot of it and did what they wanted).

Still, in the book series, characters serve a story role, are allowed to make big mistakes, and then die for those mistakes (which is why the deaths seemed "shocking" - people aren't used to consequences for main cast TV characters). But once they weren't constrained by what GRRM's vision was, they could continue along fan favorites until they just ran out of story and unceremoniously ended them - which is what TV typically does.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top