Doesn't ring a bell.There already was a series called Star Trek. Didn't last super long, only 3 seasons, but grew quite the cult following.
The listing says: “A Star Trek: Discovery spin-off series centered around Capt. Christopher Pike. (Jake Cannavale mentioned for the role of James T. Kirk)”
Are these titles usually final, or can they still change? Someone tell them that ENT already exists and isn't that old...
sounds more like kirk just interacted pike briefly. if kirk was serving under pike in a upper level ship-board assignment they would have done more than "met."suppose this leaves some wiggle for putting Kirk on the Enterprise under Pike's command.
Many people searching for it will end up watching Archer instead XDThey can change, Picard was called Destiny (working title Crosby Street), but in this case I don't think they will. Enterprise (2001-2005) was a failed series from 20 years ago. A new Trek series with that name aboard that iconic ship would be quite logical. The Trekkies know the difference between these shows and the general audience probably don't even know about Archer's Enterprise. So it's fine. Personally I would have called the show something else, but from a commercial point of view, Enterprise makes perfect sense. That ship is the most important character on a Pike show me thinks.
Many people searching for it will end up watching Archer instead XD
Others who are curious google it and find all the old hate XD
It's not good for marketing at all, I think
Good storytelling > slavish adherence to continuity. Always.Oh cmon we all know uhura and Kirk was on the enterprise during the pike era. And anyways the current crop of genius don’t give an F
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.