Trek itself was lifted from other seafaring stories and science fiction adventures. Trek's only as original as names and copyrights and a handful of concepts. But that doesn't detract from the fun.
Is it wrong that I get just the slightest amount joy whenever the show takes something that everyone assumes was canon and tramples all over it, even when it wasn't canon to begin with?
The Farragut not being a Constitution class has already brought out the nerd rage in a "certain" segment of the fandom and I am absolutely loving it.
It was a Connie in a lot of non-canon material.... People thought the Farragut was a Connie? Really?
I think the Encyclopedia out right calls it a Connie.The Okuda reference materials certainly gave the strong hint that it was.
It was a Connie in a lot of non-canon material.
The registry they chose for it in SNW even came from non-canon material that called it a Connie.
^^^...the FJ Tech Manual also called it a Connie.
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/USS_Farragut_(NCC-1647)#Background_information
According to Memory Alpha, the earliest source to use that Registry number was:
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/The_Case_of_Jonathan_Doe_Starship
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/USS_Farragut_(NCC-1647)#Background_information
Making of Star Trek and the FJ Tech Manual also called it a Connie.
"The following names have been established for starships: Enterprise, Exeter, Lexington, Yorktown, Potemkin, Republic, Hood, Constitution, Kongo, Constellation, Farragut, Valiant, and Intrepid. The latter four are listed as destroyed in various episodes." - The Making of Star Trek, p.165.
Notes on this claim:
1.) I have no memory of the name Kongo appearing in aired Trek.
2.) "Obsession" only establishes that the Cloud Creature killed half the crew, not that the Farragut itself was destroyed.
3.) The Valiant listed is presumably the one that was lost at Eminiar VIi fifty years earlier (or ca. 2217), or some 28 years before the Enterprise entered service in 2245.
4.) A reference elsewhere in TMoST claims that starships of the class to which the Enterprise belongs have been in existence for forty years (by TOS), so since ca. 2227, contradicting the assumption that the Valiant lost at Eminiar VII was a Connie.
5.) If that Valiant wasn't actually a Connie, it's possible that the Republic (NCC-1371) and the Farragut weren't also.
6.) Alternately, it's possible that there was a class of starships that looked much like Constitution-class starships constructed between ca. 2227-2245 with NCC numbers lower than 1700 - like the Sombra-class starships, and the Constellation (NCC-1017) and possibly the Republic (NCC-1371) and all those presumed Connies with registry numbers in the NCC-1600 range (except obviously the Farragut as of SNW) were actually constructed as Sombra-class vessels.
It’s a rare interview that gets an actor to share his technique in a meaningful way, but what Mount had to say about preparing for the Admiral Pike role was smashing. Replaying those scenes, I saw and heard exactly how effective that preparation was.
Anson Mount said:The easy way for the show would be to be value-neutral, especially right now. But that’s just not what Star Trek is.
You're correct that it was never used TOS, but it was part of a list of 14 names considered by the writers of the show starting in Season 2.Notes on this claim:
1.) I have no memory of the name Kongo appearing in aired Trek.
There was also the SS Valiant which was self-destructed by its Captain after in encountered the Galactic Barrier 200 years before the events of TOS S1 - Where No Man Has Gone Before.
You're correct that it was never used TOS, but it was part of a list of 14 names considered by the writers of the show starting in Season 2.
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/USS_Kongo
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Constitution_class#Footnotes
Perhaps it was Sambra classs?Yeah, no way was that starship named Valiant a Connie. She was lost at Eminiar VII in 2217 so maybe at best she was a Walker-class starship or some other vessel launched in the first years of the 23rd century. She may even have been an older class predating the year 2200.
SombraPerhaps it was Sambra classs?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.