=some bad physics
it's not that no spacecraft can go faster then light, it's that no spacecraft can accelerate faster then light within normal spacetime.
=some bad physics
it's not that no spacecraft can go faster then light, it's that no spacecraft can accelerate faster then light within normal spacetime.
No, you didn't. It was J. Michael Straczynski.
That distinction is actually very important and is why things like the Alcubierre drive are theoretically possible instead of completely impossible.If that distinction were important, we'd have "spacecraft [that] can go faster then [sic] light". Where are they? Show them to me. (By the way, it's not then, it's than.)
The Alcubierre drive is a mathematical solution of the relativistic field equations that is nevertheless not currently believed to provide the basis of a realizable faster-than-light drive. From the article you cite:That distinction is actually very important and is why things like the Alcubierre drive are theoretically possible instead of completely impossible.
I've done my research, mountains of it, long before I read a single post by you.Next time you want to use that emote, maybe do your research instead of using ChatGPT to compose your answer for you.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.