• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 2x05 - "Charades"

Place your vote! Now!


  • Total voters
    217
But this was in the context of an ongoing situation in which (from her perspective), Spock keeps prioritizing the Enterprise and Starfleet over their relationship. So that in this instance, when he again turns to his crew members instead of her, it was the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back. (Do they have camels on Vulcan?)

And that, yes, it was Chapel who rushed in to heal Spock at the end, interrupting the ceremony, was adding insult to injury. Let's give T'Pring credit for not being completely oblivious to the fact that Spock and Chapel have some sort of unspoken connection . . . or at least having reason to harbor suspicions along those lines.

"Seriously? You again?" :)
This is the best answer
 
Sarek must have went into pon farr at some point after 2293 and thus the age of 128 since Amanda was still alive at the time of TUC but he was married to Perrin by 2366.
 
It's kind of rough seeing Spock called dishonorable on here. T'Pring told him she wants a break. That's "no means no", and Spock respected that. Chapel says she has feelings for him, "yes means yes" and Spock went with that.

In a world where we have evil criminals who can't even follow those basic steps, it's shocking to me that when Spock follows them he's still criticized. He's not even married to T'Pring!
 
It's kind of rough seeing Spock called dishonorable on here. T'Pring told him she wants a break. That's "no means no", and Spock respected that. Chapel says she has feelings, "yes means yes" and Spock went with that.

In a world where we have evil criminals who can't even follow those basic steps, it's shocking to me that when Spock follows them he's still criticized. He's not even married to T'Pring!

Agreed. Also, the idea that Vulcans would have the same value system around their relationships as contemporary Americans seems... implausible at best. If Vulcans are truly dedicated to logic, surely it is more rational to explore alternate relationships during an agreed-upon "pause" in order to obtain more data upon which to make a long-term decision?
 
Did anyone else get the impression that the inter dimensional beings were sorta like the Bajoran wormhole aliens?
Except instead of becoming religious icons they became customer service.
They reminded me of the bureaucrat aliens in Hitchhiker's Guide :D

Ok keep in mind Spock got his first pon farr at the age of 37, probably delayed because of his human side. If Enterprise establishes that Vulcan women get pon farr, then she must have gotten it earlier than Spock's which was already implied in TOS to be late.
He did get pon farr on Genesis as a late teen or early twen though

My father was a human from the UK. My mother was a human from Asia. I am mixed race and a human. My mother was not a different species. I am not half-human. - hybrid. That is ****ing why. Educate yourself.
[Una] Shall we do a little education? [/Una] This has nothing to do with the biological term as used in the episode. Hybrids are from different species, not ethnicities, as you seem to say yourself. Look at the link in this post that you apparently missed to "*ing educate yourself" as you put it:
It has nothing to do with 'races' or ethnicity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_(biology)


The Doctor is the master of porn.
That was Paris, IIRC :D
 
The interviewer was, by the end of it when he wanted more out of Christine and got shut down.

That's not being in a "submissive" position. That's him getting his comeuppance after abusing his institutional authority.

Nu Spock was totally in a submissive position due to his situation.

... to whom was he submissive, pray tell? Sounds to me like you just don't like a situation where a male character doesn't have more power than women.

I definitely got Ashton Kutcher vibes in the way that Ethan played it. Very..Dude, where's my Katra.

... have you actually seen Dude, Where's My Car? or That '70s Show?

Dreadful episode.
The in-laws are coming to dinner and oopsie-daisie,hilarity ensues.
Star Trek?Or the Dick Van Dyke show?

I would watch the shit out of that spinoff.
 
Wow. Just... wow.

Let's be very clear here: Chloe Bennet is not "half Chinese, half American." She is 100% American. She is a natural-born citizen of the United States. Her racial or ethnic heritage is utterly irrelevant to whether or not she's American.

Americans tend to embrace heritage, even if they are as you say naturally born. It's not utterly irrelevant to them. They use terms like African-American and Asian-American for that reason. Those terms do have some issues, but they are the terms they use commonly and shouldn't be taken offensively.
 
In TOS we had the following examples of Vulcans: Spock - half Vulcan and full messed up. Sarek - we love him but he's a jerk. Certainly to Spock. IDIC, except for your kid. T'Pau - yes, yes, the stakes are to the death, but why explain that to anyone who might not know? Also racist AF. T'Pring - A person or two might die, but I get my new guy!

As much as I was never a fan of the "Vulcan as the restraining older brother of the Federation" take on Enterprise, Vulcans as jerks was not invented by Berman and Braga.

And let's not forget that "Amok Time" was literally the very first episode in which we saw any Vulcan other than Spock, and that T'Pring is literally the first full Vulcan ever shown on STAR TREK.

So literally the very first full Vulcan on any STAR TREK series was a cold, calculating schemer who plotted to get either Kirk or Spock killed in order to escape an arranged marriage. Not exactly a good first impression!

Not sure how people got the idea that Vulcans are always noble paragons of reasons. That's certainly not how they were portrayed in "Amok Time," back in the day. Even T'Pau comes off as very high-handed and imperious and scornful of humans.


And yet somehow ENTERPRISE gets scolded for portraying Vulcans in a negative light? Decades after "Amok Time"?
 
Americans tend to embrace heritage, even if they are as you say naturally born. It's not utterly irrelevant to them. They use terms like African-American and Asian-American for that reason. Those terms do have some issues, but they are the terms they use commonly and shouldn't be taken offensively.

It is offensive. In context, saying that Chloe Bennett is "half Chinese, half American" is equating Americanness with whiteness.
 
So the 'Awareness ritual' is basically the 'Airing of grievances' in Festivus? And T'Pring's parents are basically Vulcan Frank and Estelle Costanza.

Interesting they're doing all these episodes about Spock's marriage to T'Pring when we know it ends in a plot to force Spock to kill Kirk.
 
From a metatextual, real-life POV, I would take this as part of a thematic indication that there is something fundamentally wrong about Spock without his Vulcan half, that he is incomplete and damaged without this essential part of himself. He's truly not himself, and this is why Christine treats the crises as though it will result in Spock "dying" -- because in a way, it will.
A similar analysis of the text of The Infinite Vulcan could apply too.
 
Vulcans were underhanded and brutal 34 years before Ambassador Soval or the Vulcan High Command were ever things. We like to think they're the most level-headed and ethical species of all the founders of the Federation but even TOS showed us that, nope, they at best tried and at worst just put on a good P.R. show for the rest of the galaxy.
 
Americans tend to embrace heritage, even if they are as you say naturally born. It's not utterly irrelevant to them. They use terms like African-American and Asian-American for that reason. Those terms do have some issues, but they are the terms they use commonly and shouldn't be taken offensively.
That's a different issue.
 
So I'm wondering why the aliens didn't think Chapel was the one who needed repair and made her Vulcan? Maybe they thought Spock was damaged because he diverted the shields to Chapel?

I really like Chapel. I know it's not TOS Chapel but I can accept that. I Like T'Pring also. Too bad that it doesn't work out. I'll give this one a 7/10.

The way they said his 'instructions were written wrong', I took that to mean that Chapel presented a complete human genome while Spock's was mixed, so they figured that Chapel's was 'correct' and fixed Spock so that he had a complete human genome as well, while the 'incorrect' Vulcan instructions (DNA) were removed.
 
Vulcans were underhanded and brutal 34 years before Ambassador Soval or the Vulcan High Command were ever things. We like to think they're the most level-headed and ethical species of all the founders of the Federation but even TOS showed us that, nope, they at best tried and at worst just put on a good P.R. show for the rest of the galaxy.
Yes. Spock may be aspirational in some ways but saying all Vulcans must be that too?

No. They use ritual, tradition and culture as well. They are students of logic but even logic can be faulty.
 
And let's not forget that "Amok Time" was literally the very first episode in which we saw any Vulcan other than Spock, and that T'Pring is literally the first full Vulcan ever shown on STAR TREK.

So literally the very first full Vulcan on any STAR TREK series was a cold, calculating schemer who plotted to get either Kirk or Spock killed in order to escape an arranged marriage. Not exactly a good first impression!

Not sure how people got the idea that Vulcans are always noble paragons of reasons. That's certainly not how they were portrayed in "Amok Time," back in the day. Even T'Pau comes off as very high-handed and imperious and scornful of humans.


And yet somehow ENTERPRISE gets scolded for portraying Vulcans in a negative light? Decades after "Amok Time"?

In fairness, post-SNW, I'm tempted to reinterpret T'Pring's motivations in "Amok Time" to make her less murderous.

"You really told him you were plotting to either get him killed or to kill his best friend?"

"Yes."

"Why would you do that?"

"I know the kind of people who serve in Starfleet. I knew that Spock was never in any real danger; I knew Spock's crewmates would come up with a way to keep his captain alive; and I knew the shock of believing his best friend dead would finally sever the last remnants of the ties that once bound us. And I had no other option to terminate the engagement under traditional Vulcan law."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top