Let's hope.In a future episode, Chapel is tested by the Metrons and fails a Star Trek Trivia Challenge. As punishment, her personality and memories of interacting with T'Pring are erased.
Let's hope.In a future episode, Chapel is tested by the Metrons and fails a Star Trek Trivia Challenge. As punishment, her personality and memories of interacting with T'Pring are erased.
Yet, he does.Why would Spock introduce T'Pring as his wife? She ISN'T his wife.
Because they are more than betrothed and less than married. The term "wife" is the closest human equivalent at that point in their relationship.Yet, he does.
The scene is at the end of these "cut for commercial time" scenes from the original Amok Time.He called her his wife in the episode. Maybe it's a Vulcan thing.
When they enter orbit of Vulcan, T'Pring pops up on the view screen.
If it's not in the aired episode it doesn't count.The scene is at the end of these "cut for commercial time" scenes from the original Amok Time.
It's fiction. He's close enough.
No, Spock must've gotten together with the Enterprise Incident's Romulan commander. It's the only way to explain him becoming such a Romulan lover in his old age.Finally, after decades of missed opportunity with Spock/Saavik, the door opens again. I think it was worth the wait though, too.
I think the actor and his age are fine. But what I'm wondering is how does this character fit in with Dr. Boyce and Dr. Piper. I thought Piper succeeded Boyce on Enterprise. Or is it all retconned...
We never saw the transition so why would Piper be succeeding Boyce? We had no context.I think the actor and his age are fine. But what I'm wondering is how does this character fit in with Dr. Boyce and Dr. Piper. I thought Piper succeeded Boyce on Enterprise. Or is it all retconned...
No, Dr. Piper is there in 2265 so at some point M'Benga is no longer CMO and that's even before McCoy arrives. But Kirk doesn't take command for another six years so that's plenty of time for events to fall into line.
I kinda believe (and truly hope) that by the 23rd Century, almost everybody would be confident enough in their own sexuality to be open to experimenting, without the current societal stigmas attached to their choices.
This will probably be my mantra throughout SNW.I don't see a contradiction as people can and do change some attitudes as they get older, and nothing really sticks out as an OMG! contradiction.
I wish the slap has been edited out. Call me crazy but after the Jonny Deep and Amber Head mess of marriage, women should not be shown treating men in a way we know will not be acceptable if it was in reverse.Chapel doesn’t have any of these characteristics though. The slap isn’t even really a slap.
It's 100+ years in the future but in TNG this seemed to be the case. Riker fell for an androgynous alien who identified as female (but appearance wise wasn't one) and Crusher denied a relationship to a Trill in a female body not because of the female body but because of the uncertainty if "who" this person would be in the future. (Trills were treated differently here before being re-engineered in DS9.) I believe they made her ending of the relationship clearly to be based in the instability of who the physical body would be and not because the Trill was mow female.
The idea in TNG clearly seems to be more bisexual, or panesxual, thinking.
Losing your fiancé just might have an impact upon a person.I wish the slap has been edited out. Call me crazy but after the Jonny Deep and Amber Head mess of marriage, women should not be shown treating men in a way we know will not be acceptable if it was in reverse.
Additionally slapping Spock, is to out of character for Spock to be handled that way.
Lastly how did heck does she slap him, when in TOS she is so meek and shy to him. They changed Chapel too much and her bi sexuality is not even the biggest change.
I LOVED the 'Command style' differences shown between Una and La'an; and HOW they showed it:
- Una being more 'Pike like' and being 'friendly' to get the ensign to open up and tell her exactly what they were doing and why.
- La'an being HARD CORE BUTTON DOWN MILITARY with the "Okay, talk now or the next chance you get will be at you court martial..."
It always has been and always will be a broad spectrum. The difference being mostly in how comfortable we are with accepting it both within ourselves and others. Chapel suggesting she's bisexual would hardly be noteworthy today, much less (hopefully) in the far future.So you're saying everyone in the future will be bisexual or pansexual?
It always has been and always will be a broad spectrum. The difference being mostly in how comfortable we are with accepting it both within ourselves and others. Chapel suggesting she's bisexual would hardly be noteworthy today, much less (hopefully) in the far future.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.