No.But by the tos era The current actor will be more than 8 years older than Bradshaw. They should have gotten a younger actor.
They should hire the person who best fits for the character.
No.But by the tos era The current actor will be more than 8 years older than Bradshaw. They should have gotten a younger actor.
AlthoughI love that La'an referred to the ship's food systems as synthesizers, as she should. There are no food replicators in 2259 even though the comical breakfast cereal ad attached to "The Trouble With Edward(SHO)" suggested otherwise.
No.
They should hire the person who best fits for the character.
Hey we should appreciate how good we have it here on Trek because that other Star franchise is about to launch a prequel show starring a 40 something actor who's line in the original work is "I have been in this fight for 20 years since I was 6 years old!"Exactly. A younger actor would have been. Perfect. Maybe a 25 year old actor and a doctor just below the chief medical officer would have been more canon appropriate.
And if those appropriate age candidates were not a good fit?Exactly. A younger actor would have been. Perfect. Maybe a 25 year old actor and a doctor just below the chief medical officer would have been more canon appropriate.
Also: have we forgotten the TAS Robert April and the SNW Robert April? And we're worried about the prequel M'Benga looking older than the TOS M'Benga?
And if those appropriate age candidates were not a good fit?
Why? Age appropriate doesn't guarantee scheduling, availability, appropriate fit to the character or willingness to work with the production team. The number of factors in hiring an actor are way more than the simplified view of "he's the right age."There are lots of age appropriate actors. So they would have I'm sure picked the right candidate.
Good shout! I completely forgot about her. Lots of existing plot threads to delve into.I'm more concerned after these 2 T'Pring episodes with how they're going to handle Leila Kalomi who should meet Spock around Season 3.
Because canon and visuals trump good storytelling and character development.How is this anybody's deal breaker?![]()
April: Chris your sushi gave the last guests we met with food poisoning and they went straight to the Klingons and their gagh.
Pike:![]()
Of course it's the version originally aired. The 'cut' version is the one they take the reaction shots out of so they can inser more commercial time.Is it the version originally aired? Are we talking syndication cuts? What is meant by "uncut"?
Would watching actually make the writer think, "On no! I can't do my Chapel/T'Pring scene!"
I appreciate that.I'm a well-know visual continuity stickler. If I'm cool with M'Benga then there's no issue.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.