The Expanse? I heard that's good.Can we get a show for people that don't like nostalgia and memberberries?
In the Disco Era, if I were to show the Enterprise, it would be NCC-371701. It fits the rest of the numbers from what we've seen in the 32nd Century, keeps the "1701", and doesn't look ridiculous. Similar to how the Stargazer in PIC is NCC-82893.Honestly, at this point, I think it’s fine if they do away with the 1701 number. To me, it was believable up to the enterprise E.
I maybe incorporate 1701 into the registry number and just ditch the end alpha character
Discovery - (Honestly I don't know who this is for)
This is precisely what I was meaning, but I couldn’t put it into words. Thank you.In the Disco Era, if I were to show the Enterprise, it would be NCC-371701. It fits the rest of the numbers from what we've seen in the 32nd Century, keeps the "1701", and doesn't look ridiculous. Similar to how the Stargazer in PIC is NCC-82893.
Is it too self-centered to say "Me."?This is why I think it's being canceled a bit early, TBH. It worked as a flagship when there wasn't "a Trek for all flavors" but now it's unclear who it's supposed to appeal to.
This was a farewell, let it be the farewell and move the fuck on
Yes.NO....
Does anyone else have the feeling Seven is going to channel Capt. Styles with an “Execute”?
It appeals to me as a OG fan of Star Trek TOS. It felt to me like what TOS would have been if produced in an era of better technology. It was (is) Star Trek to me.This is why I think it's being canceled a bit early, TBH. It worked as a flagship when there wasn't "a Trek for all flavors" but now it's unclear who it's supposed to appeal to.
How about a Pakled inspired "make us go"?She might use Janeway's "Do it!"
Or maybe just a simple "Go!"
The *actual* "future" of Trek is the series like SNW, SFA and such..that is where Trek is going. This was a farewell, let it be the farewell and move the fuck on
Explore, too.Wallowing in the past is the "future"?
I refuse to accept that. We know little to nothing about the new bridge crew (the La Forge sisters, Mura, Esma, etc.). There's still so much to explode in the 25th century.
Yes, yes it is. Because that is what the fans want with the ratings and demonstrates and dogs and cats living together, MASS HYSTERIA!Wallowing in the past is the "future"?![]()
I want to agree with this but I just...can't right now. The 25th century feels stale already. It makes me sad but I don't want to see Seven, or Jack (especially Jack), or LaForges etc. I just lost interest.There's still so much to explode in the 25th century.
Only because people need a villain. Because that's very much Star Trek's message; hate what you don't agree with.Alex Kurtzman might be the best villain in Star Trek history.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.