• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 4x08 - "All In"

Rate the episode...

  • 10 - Excellent!

    Votes: 10 7.4%
  • 9

    Votes: 11 8.1%
  • 8

    Votes: 44 32.6%
  • 7

    Votes: 31 23.0%
  • 6

    Votes: 18 13.3%
  • 5

    Votes: 14 10.4%
  • 4

    Votes: 2 1.5%
  • 3

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • 2

    Votes: 2 1.5%
  • 1 - Terrible.

    Votes: 2 1.5%

  • Total voters
    135
I really don't know what people want out of Star Trek anymore.

DSC is serialized, serious, action/violence-heavy, etc...people whine about how it's not fun, doesn't go to planets enough and blah blah blah.

DSC has light, episodic, fun planet-based adventure....people whine about it being filler.

So frustrating to be a fan sometimes...I remember back in the old days when it was simpler. "And the Children Shall Lead," "Code of Honor," and "Threshold" all blow. You know....easy stuff...stuff we could all agree on.
Maybe DSC is just fairly run of the mill no matter what they try do.

Or maybe people just want Founders to be goo.
 
I really don't know what people want out of Star Trek anymore.

DSC is serialized, serious, action/violence-heavy, etc...people whine about how it's not fun, doesn't go to planets enough and blah blah blah.

DSC has light, episodic, fun planet-based adventure....people whine about it being filler.

So frustrating to be a fan sometimes...I remember back in the old days when it was simpler. "And the Children Shall Lead," "Code of Honor," and "Threshold" all blow. You know....easy stuff...stuff we could all agree on.

Keep in mind that the fanbase is diverse. There are older fans who long for the glory days of TOS and TNG. There might be fans of the JJ Abrams movies who want to see more action and adventure. You might also have fans who want to see more serialization and some fans who want more standalone stories. You might have fans who just want to be entertained, and other fans who want be intellectually challenged. I don't think it it is the same group of fans who complain about serialization not being fun and complain about light episodes being filler.
 
Given that this is Trek, the planet destroyer will have a “good reason” for destroying planets like the survival of its own species/universe/timeline and Michael be called upon to make a “heart wrenching choice” in the penultimate episode. Tarka probably needs all that power to get to his favored universe and will double cross Book, who will have to decide at the last minute to help Star Fleet to save the universe.

I’d actually prefer a surprise and a straight up enemy that doesn’t care who they kill.

This wasn’t a terrible episode. I enjoyed the casino scenes and the poker game and Owosekun’s conversation with Tarka more than I did her boxing match. I suppose the Xindi might have evolved into the enemy species or might have joined forces with the Changelings.
 
Last edited:
I really don't know what people want out of Star Trek anymore.

DSC is serialized, serious, action/violence-heavy, etc...people whine about how it's not fun, doesn't go to planets enough and blah blah blah.

DSC has light, episodic, fun planet-based adventure....people whine about it being filler.

So frustrating to be a fan sometimes...I remember back in the old days when it was simpler. "And the Children Shall Lead," "Code of Honor," and "Threshold" all blow. You know....easy stuff...stuff we could all agree on.

I didn't think this was an awful episode, but I rated it a 6, which is the lowest rating I have given this season. It just...wasn't that interesting. As I said, I thought in some ways it hung together better than other episodes this season (no extraneous B/C plots to keep secondary characters in the spotlight) but the execution wasn't that entertaining to me.

Trek has of course done "heist" style stories before. IMHO those outings were much more entertaining. Even something more recent like Stardust City Rag (an episode I enjoyed less overall) leaned into the campiness of the whole thing and tried to have some fun. Everything here is a bit too on the nose for me.
 
I really don't know what people want out of Star Trek anymore.

DSC is serialized, serious, action/violence-heavy, etc...people whine about how it's not fun, doesn't go to planets enough and blah blah blah.

DSC has light, episodic, fun planet-based adventure....people whine about it being filler.

So frustrating to be a fan sometimes...I remember back in the old days when it was simpler. "And the Children Shall Lead," "Code of Honor," and "Threshold" all blow. You know....easy stuff...stuff we could all agree on.
What they want is it to be exactly like the past.
 
I really don't know what people want out of Star Trek anymore.

I like ST: prodigy and Lower Decks just fine.

I would have liked for Disco writers to have created a more meaningful technologically and scientifically developed environment for the 32nd century (aka Type III and Type IV civilization stuff for UFP by emphasizing/showcasing a decent approximation of exponential developments and returns - there is plenty of material out there that could have been adapted for Trek in the 32nd century) and find some kind of 'balance' in regards to emotional display (as oppossed to a massive emotional rollelcoaster we got - with I don't know, perhas more 'competence' from Disco crew? They behaved more professionally and capable in the first 2 seasons, so S3 and 4 seem to have just eroded their common sense among other things).
 
You're looking at the wrong Franchise then.

Trek can EASILY be used for what I described... in fact, things alluded that the UFP was headed into that direction... and then... nothing.
If you ask me its just poor writing on the part of Disco writers (they even made synth body tech virtually non-viable for anyone 'just because').
At least Prodigy made an effort to take what happened before and showcase some meaningful development in the form of the Protostar and Dauntless for example (and in only 5 years since VOY returned) and the show developers actually make an EFFORT in explaining a few things (or at least as much as they can without divulging too much).

Now THAT's some proper progress in universe wise if you ask me coupled with just better writing.

Discovery on the other hand... it was meh since it arrived in the 32nd century (sans perhaps Zora - which is maybe 1 element out of how many?).
Too much emphasis on personal drama and emotions running wild as opposed to the actual story.
I don't mind character development (in fact I applaud it), but there's a nuance on how to handle emotions in live action as opposed to being all over the place like it has been for Disco.
 
I hope Book doesn't die or otherwise leave the series but if it has to happen it would up the dramatic stakes and make it personal, and that's something DSC needs to do more of. Personal tragedies on a small scale that hit home for one character and less of the galaxy-threatening megadisasters. For once it'd be one life lost that changes a lead character and not a war or a time travel conundrum or galactic emergency.
Burnham has already lost Georgou and lots of other stuff, We don’t need more Burnham tears, I want to see captian Burnham more.
 
Definitely not because they were goo.
The founders only turn into goo at will or due to injury, when they are exposed we have seen changelings revert to the Odo face like Laas, the Female Changeling, the ambassador changeling ect. The use of the term ‘changeling’ (capitalised and the Odo face points to it being the founder species from DS9
 
I must be watching a different show than many of you. Story complexity is the glue of a good show but character development carries the weight for me. Babylon 5 is still the master at that. For this ep, two words “Oh Wow”, sealed the deal.
Babylon V was definitely THE master for that, but if you look at it it had two things that discovery solery lacks.

1. Internal coherence. Plenty of times it’s pretty obvious that the writers here have a cool idea, want to get from A to D but never took the time to figure out B and C, so you get episodes like this one and the preceding and deeply unsatisfying season endings, when the big mystery that has been hyped all season turns out not being that interesting or make much sense. Having a single individual with a single vision and a more or less written plan in charge certainly helped here B5, of course.

2. each B5 episode had an internal arc, with a beginning, a middle and an end. They could be seen as single episodes an would work anyway, but seen together they built a bigger story. LDS and prodigy are written this way, discovery and Picard aren’t. This invariably leaves me with a sense of incompleteness, as if I turned up the tv mid episode and shut it down before the ending.

By the way, B5 DID lose both these things in the very last few episodes before the finale, when they had run out of material and episodes dragged on without a real purpose, not unlike certain discovery episodes.
 
Last edited:
She’s not that person anymore. Have you paid attention to her character growth?

Yes I have. She left that prisoner behind for example. But this is a galaxy threatening event AND THEY STOLE CLASSIFIED FEDERATION TECH so maybe she should be a bit more aggressive.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top