What gave you that impression?Discovery looks like it will be a boring boring political soapbox.
I think the Orville looks fine, too, and I'm willing to like it despite MacFarlane.
Yes, SPN did an episode with basically the exact same premise, only earlier. There is no way, no way MacFarlane came up with something identical on his own (didn't credit it, either, to my knowledge). It's way too specific.
And a running joke at the same time.Verging on a pun.
And a running joke at the same time.
Sentient teddy bear stories have been around nearly as long as teddy bears themselves.
http://theweek.com/articles/562931/humanitys-long-strange-fixation-talking-teddy-bears
Impossible to fully verify, but some general looking around... track the comment... look at the FB profile...lines up the commenter with the Trek era he or she would have grown up in, and it is also helpful that Trek eras are rather easily divided (TOS first run, TOS re-runs/movies, Berman era Trek, Kelvin era films) and neatly correspond to ten/twenty year brackets.
That's the TV show based on some books you wrote, right?Have you checked out THE LIBRARIANS?
I swear to God I didn't do that on purpose. Must be second nature at this point.![]()
Bergman's Trek was pretty dark and bleak.Re-runs and movies Cross over into Bergman era. And that's all much more stalkers than just asking.
Because everyone seems to be blathering about diversity and the produces seem to be making that a selling point which smacks of a weak show. A good show with a diverse cast doesnt need to use the diversity as a selling point.What gave you that impression?
ooookay.Because everyone seems to be blathering about diversity and the produces seem to be making that a selling point which smacks of a weak show. A good show with a diverse cast doesnt need to use the diversity as a selling point.
Diversity does not make a show. GOOD STORY TELLING does.
The most IMPORTANT factor is if it is entertaining or not.
Now you you can have entertainment and diversity , and I have no problem with a well rounded cast, what I have a problem is when everything hangs on ticking minority boxes.
And here is a little hard truth to shatter snowflake dreams.
The reason minoritys are minoritys is because......GUESS WHAT! THEY ARE IN THE MINORITY!
So the show being a in a capitalist market where 70%+ of the market are white heterosexual binary gendered like me, needs to entaintain us of we switch off and the show is sunk.
I have no problem with a black female lead, hell i dont think its news worthy, we had sisko my favorite captain before. But if every episode panders to the black market my TV goes off.
I have no problems if gays on TV but if every other episode is about gay issues I find boring my TV goes off.
FUN should be the selling point of a TV program and ENTERTAINMENT .
Knowing McFarlane, there'll be a shit load of Captain's log toilet jokes.
This. Exactly this. I'll put this down for posterity now. I think The Orville will last longer than Discovery.
Bergman's Trek was pretty dark and bleak.
ooookay.
Took the words from my mouth.
Ghostbusters didn't fail because of diversity, it failed because Sony is an awful studio and put out a terrible product. Sony hasn't had a decent movie in years. They also wrecked Spider-Man and James Bond.See...I too am on the oooooookay side of this fence. But there's a kernel in there that I can't ignore...the ghostbusters reboot was crap, and was sold on its diversity shtick.
The good news is...DSC actually isn't....so I too can now form part of this barbershop quartet, having got that out of the way.
Oooooooooookay
Ghostbusters didn't fail because of diversity, it failed because Sony is an awful studio and put out a terrible product. Sony hasn't had a decent movie in years. They also wrecked Spider-Man and James Bond.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.