But he stole from a very specific Supernatural episode and made that dumb fucking Ted movie. As a Supernatural fangirl, that pisses me off. Also, I just don't think his humour is funny. 

I generally don't, either, but I think Orville is right in his personal interest and I think might have a different flavor of humor.But he stole from a very specific Supernatural episode and made that dumb fucking Ted movie. As a Supernatural fangirl, that pisses me off. Also, I just don't think his humour is funny.![]()
I had no idea Supernatural had done Ted before TedBut he stole from a very specific Supernatural episode and made that dumb fucking Ted movie. As a Supernatural fangirl, that pisses me off. Also, I just don't think his humour is funny.![]()
Unfortunately, all to common in Hollywood.I think the Orville looks fine, too, and I'm willing to like it despite MacFarlane.
Yes, SPN did an episode with basically the exact same premise, only earlier. There is no way, no way MacFarlane came up with something identical on his own (didn't credit it, either, to my knowledge). It's way too specific.
And Star Trek is no more immune to this than any other property.Well, ain't that the truth.![]()
That look and design aesthetic is VERY familiar to a certain age bracket of Trek fans, and without fully realizing it, that the is the "real Trek" they want and when they don't get it, it bugs them.
The Orville looks like it took almost every single TNG cue and expanded on it - the lighting, the costumes, the alien makeup, everything is a homage to TNG.
ST: Discovery, on the other hand, really seems to take most of it's cues from ENT and the Kelvin era films.
So at the heart of this whole issue is that Seth has made a show that triggers the happy nostalgia button in most folks close to my age (mid -30's) and that warm fuzzy feeling is what is making them choose a spoof comedy over actual Star Trek.
Sentient teddy bear stories have been around nearly as long as teddy bears themselves.But he stole from a very specific Supernatural episode and made that dumb fucking Ted movie. As a Supernatural fangirl, that pisses me off.![]()
Yes, expectations can really stand in your way if they're unrealistic.
Hey, remember this whole Star Trek thing is just a rip-off of Forbidden Planet!
I think you might be on to something. However, it might be something else, too: The Orville is a (seemingly affectionate) parody show that isn't the future of the Trek franchise on tv. DSC is the official thing, so we really, really need it to be good. If MacFarlane's show fails (and I liked the trailer even though I positively loathe pretty much everything he does), that'll mean nothing to any of us. There are no stakes. If DSC fails, however, that's bound to have repercussions for the ST franchise as a whole. That's why reactions are less tense to MacFarlane, I think.
Of course, I'm not saying that is the only explanation that is true forever and applies to all. People will prefer one show (show's trailer) over the other for a number of reasons.
Everyone in Hollywood is a plagiarist.
Which was based on "A True Reportory of the Wracke and Redemption of Sir Thomas Gates, Knight".Which was based on Shakespeare's "The Tempest."![]()
I'll be giving the show a look. I've been missing a more comedic sci-fi show since Eureka and Warehouse 13 ended.
Verging on a pun.Have you checked out THE LIBRARIANS?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.