Why not cleverly retconning or clumsily foreshadowing?Cleverly foreshadowing or clumsily retconning? After an Arena rewatch I'm going to have to go with the latter.
Why not cleverly retconning or clumsily foreshadowing?Cleverly foreshadowing or clumsily retconning? After an Arena rewatch I'm going to have to go with the latter.
The world is your rhetorical oyster. Go with your heart.Why not cleverly retconning or clumsily foreshadowing?
The point is, if the TOS look was as perfect and timeless as is claimed, then they would have just replicated it for TMP rather then creating a whole new look and explaining it as a refit. Indeed, even Gene Roddenberry tried saying in his novelization of TMP that this was Starfleet's real look and that TOS was just a dramatization of events.The ship had a refit. Thats what happens when a 30 year old ship gets a refit. It looks different and updated.
Indeed.The point is, if the TOS look was as perfect and timeless as is claimed, then they would have just replicated it for TMP rather then creating a whole new look and explaining it as a refit. Indeed, even Gene Roddenberry tried saying in his novelization of TMP that this was Starfleet's real look and that TOS was just a dramatization of events.
I would just go with 'bad'. lolCleverly foreshadowing or clumsily retconning? After an Arena rewatch I'm going to have to go with the latter.
Realizing that TOS was just what they had the budget to do at the time, and was not close to how Gene or others would have wanted to do it, is the crucial first step in ridding oneself of obsessions with "canon" and "continuity."The point is, if the TOS look was as perfect and timeless as is claimed, then they would have just replicated it for TMP rather then creating a whole new look and explaining it as a refit. Indeed, even Gene Roddenberry tried saying in his novelization of TMP that this was Starfleet's real look and that TOS was just a dramatization of events.
This way lies wisdom.Realizing that TOS was just what they had the budget to do at the time, and was not close to how Gene or others would have wanted to do it, is the crucial first step in ridding oneself of obsessions with "canon" and "continuity."
Shades of AvP 2007.8/10 they should have kissed.
Nothing clumsy about this one.Cleverly foreshadowing or clumsily retconning? After an Arena rewatch I'm going to have to go with the latter.
Can you point to the dialogue that says it didn’t?Canon went out the airlock when ENT had Klingon first contact be on Earth of all places.
He cannot.Can you point to the dialogue that says it didn’t?
Because there was nothing clever about having the Metron in "Terrarium".Why not cleverly retconning or clumsily foreshadowing?
Because there was nothing clever about having the Metron in "Terrarium"
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.