Nope.Also in the Mark of Gideon they mention the size of the Enterprise being 288 meters long I believe.
Nope.Also in the Mark of Gideon they mention the size of the Enterprise being 288 meters long I believe.
Rewatch "The Mark of Gideon." The size of the Enterprise is mentioned nowhere in the episode. Neither the phrase "288 meters" nor "947 feet" with regard to the size of the Enterprise is uttered by anyone in an episode of TOS.Also in the Mark of Gideon they mention the size of the Enterprise being 288 meters long I believe.
Read above. So its canon. The Enterprise has mysteriously gotten larger in SNW. Maybe they decide to simultaneously shrink the Enterprise and double the crew compliment by 2065.
Rewatch "The Mark of Gideon." The size of the Enterprise is mentioned nowhere in the episode. Neither the phrase "288 meters" nor "947 feet" with regard to the size of the Enterprise is uttered by anyone in an episode of TOS.
The only measurement we have given in dialogue for a Starfleet vessel in TOS is the size of a shuttlecraft in "The Galileo Seven" - "a twenty-four foot shuttlecraft" (also note the use of Imperial units, not metric).
Nope.
Not legible.Its on a screen.
Its on a screen.
Yup.
^^Similarly, in DS9 S6 Admiral Ross has his Starfleet Academy diploma in his office which lists his first name as Cliff. S7 has his first name established in dialogue as William.
In "Image in the Sand", Odo refers to Ross as "Bill". This was originally put in as a joke by writers Ira Steven Behr and Hans Beimler, who weren't thinking of the diplomas when they gave Ross a new given name. As Behr explained, however, it quickly became popular; "At the time Hans and I wrote the line, we weren't even sure if that was the admiral's name, because Odo was making a joke. But it caught on, and after that, every goddam writer had to put the name in his script. You know: 'Oh, there's Bill Ross.' 'Let's get Bill Ross to perform the ceremony.' So he's no longer 'Admiral Ross,' he's Bill." (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Companion, pp. 597-598)
It could have been it's own episode: 45 minutes of Una getting swept off her feet by a particularly odd Vulcan.I don't know if we needed the humorous subplot with Number One and Doug (much as I love Patton Oswalt) in an episode that was already humorous
You're telling me there's a dedicated closeup of a diagram of the Enterprise with a legible scale explicitly saying the Enterprise is "288 meters" long in "The Mark of Gideon?" Are you sure? Timestamp, please.
In TNG's "The Next Phase," Geordi's death certificate gives his mother's name as Alvera K. LaForge. It's onscreen. When "Interface" airs, Geordi's mother's name is Silva. In your estimation, what is Geordi's mother's real name? Both are on screen. Alvera came first. Which is her real name, and which is the canon-busting continuity error?
Recasts don't fall into the calculation of what's canon on-screen since often they are unavoidable. However, SNW could have used TOS sets if they wanted to (as seen in TNG and Enterprise). Thus, a refit between SNW and TOS is canon.And by that logic, it's canon that between Spock's death and his resurrection on the Genesis planet, Saavik had a massive physical shift causing her to look like she was an entirely different person!
It's canon that Gary put R on the tombstone. We can't just pretend it says T because it obviously doesn't on-screen. Why Gary put R there is something only he knows.Again. James R. Kirk.
And no, Kirk didn't legally change his middle name between 2265 and 2266 and Gary Mitchell wasn't forgetting his best friend's middle name after 15 years of knowing him, not with deity-like ESP superpowers.
Can you make out any of the measurement units in said scale?Sorry. Its in the Enterprise incident. A clearly marked scale is right next to the diagram .
Of course, it can be changed, but should one be naive to the confusion or dissatisfaction the change might cause?Again. James R. Kirk.
And no, Kirk didn't legally change his middle name between 2265 and 2266 and Gary Mitchell wasn't forgetting his best friend's middle name after 15 years of knowing him, not with deity-like ESP superpowers.
Exactly. There are simple aspects of being a stage production that comes with the territory. It doesn't require "alternate continuity/continuity violation" to cope with it. It's set dressing.Again. James R. Kirk.
And no, Kirk didn't legally change his middle name between 2265 and 2266 and Gary Mitchell wasn't forgetting his best friend's middle name after 15 years of knowing him, not with deity-like ESP superpowers.
I'd vote for that subplot not existing at all, not spinning it off into its own episode.It could have been it's own episode: 45 minutes of Una getting swept off her feet by a particularly odd Vulcan.
How about the implication that warp drive was actually time travel ("we've broken the time barrier!"), which was quietly done away with by Where No Man Has Gone Before.Warp drive was a post-S.S. Columbia crash invention until it wasn't. Zefram Cochrane was now the inventor of warp drive and it happened more than 150 years before TOS. Yet both episodes coexist in the same continuity and timeline. Neither episode suffers, and one can head canon why warp drive got so much faster between the crash and Pike and his crew arriving.
The Constitution-class warp engines are a really good reason for ships suddenly becoming so much faster!
R is canon. T is canon. No need to pretend anything. T becomes what it is.It's canon that Gary put R on the tombstone. We can't just pretend it says T because it obviously doesn't on-screen. Why Gary put R there is something only he knows.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.