Why do fans continuously think they are the arbiters of what constitutes canon?
Its on screen in tos. Its canon.
Why do fans continuously think they are the arbiters of what constitutes canon?
In that case, it's canon that the Enterprise was refit between Pike's tenure and Kirk's tenure to look like flimsy cardboard interior design, because that's what's on screen so it's canon. This idea propagated online, including on these boards, that the SNW Enterprise is how the ship really looked in TOS is not what's actually shown on screen, seems to be based on fans' wishful thinking, and is therefore not canon.If it's not on screen, it's not canon.
It's that simple.
In that case, it's canon that the Enterprise was refit between Pike's tenure and Kirk's tenure to look like flimsy cardboard interior design, because that's what's on screen so it's canon. This idea propagated online, including on these boards, that the SNW Enterprise is how the ship really looked in TOS is not what's actually shown on screen, seems to be based on fans' wishful thinking, and is therefore not canon.
No, that's not on screenIn that case, it's canon that the Enterprise was refit between Pike's tenure and Kirk's tenure to look like flimsy cardboard interior design, because that's what's on screen so it's canon.
No. I’m not going to do that. Not within my purview. Nor anyone else’s who doesn’t have decision making power in this matter. That’s the point.Tell that to those who love "Matt Jefferies" TOS Connie design.
"Matt Jefferies" made the TOS Connies with a very specific defined set of dimensions.
Are you going to contradict his Connie with the SNW Connie that was made by "John Eaves"?
So now the Enterprise is 442 metres long.
As does the Cerritos, the Rubber Duck Room was even mentioned in dialogue.The Enterprise D has a giant duck somewhere
"In the 23rd century holographic imaging was less precise"What's onscreen is that the ship looks different in different episodes. No "refit" explanation is offered in canon.
With no readable numbers/dimensions.As I recall there was a scale on the diagram. Good enough.
Yes. Now. Prior to this episode, it had not been communicated and so remained ambiguous. Now the ambiguity is gone. It’s not that complicated.Now"? When was it not? You're not implying that it was ever communicated differently are you? Because I have seen many posts on this board that assure me that it never was. This is the first time ever that we have learned the length of the Enterprise.
Indeed. And likewise if it's on screen in SNW, it's canon.Its on screen in tos. Its canon.
Just accept that it existed. Which is why Spock and Scottie suggest the OK Corral was a holodeck.Fine, then. But the holodeck we see in SNW shouldn't be as advanced as the ones in TNG because, again, they act like it's something new and impressive.
I'd allow for some level of primitive holodeck technology (no smells, good, primitive sensations overall less "real") to account for even Berman era folks speaking of earlier holodeck technology but when we're shown it in S1-2 of TNG everyone acts like what we're shown is remarkable and brand new.
With no readable numbers/dimensions.
Indeed. And likewise if it's on screen in SNW, it's canon.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.