=some bad physics
it's not that no spacecraft can go faster then light, it's that no spacecraft can accelerate faster then light within normal spacetime.
=some bad physics
it's not that no spacecraft can go faster then light, it's that no spacecraft can accelerate faster then light within normal spacetime.
No, you didn't. It was J. Michael Straczynski.
That distinction is actually very important and is why things like the Alcubierre drive are theoretically possible instead of completely impossible.If that distinction were important, we'd have "spacecraft [that] can go faster then [sic] light". Where are they? Show them to me. (By the way, it's not then, it's than.)
The Alcubierre drive is a mathematical solution of the relativistic field equations that is nevertheless not currently believed to provide the basis of a realizable faster-than-light drive. From the article you cite:That distinction is actually very important and is why things like the Alcubierre drive are theoretically possible instead of completely impossible.
I've done my research, mountains of it, long before I read a single post by you.Next time you want to use that emote, maybe do your research instead of using ChatGPT to compose your answer for you.
You probably should have read the entire article.The Alcubierre drive is a mathematical solution of the relativistic field equations that is nevertheless not currently believed to provide the basis of a realizable faster-than-light drive. From the article you cite:
If exotic matter with the correct properties does not exist, then the drive cannot be constructed.
This exotic matter is not known to exist, so the claim that the drive is even theoretically possible is unfounded.
I've done my research, mountains of it, long before I read a single post by you.
Post proof I am using AI to compose my posts, or retract your fucking claim.
I did read the entire article. More importantly, I've read Alcubierre's paper.You probably should have read the entire article.
That's an undemonstrated claim.At the close of his original article,[5] however, Alcubierre argued (following an argument developed by physicists analyzing traversable wormholes[6][7]) that the Casimir vacuum between parallel plates could fulfill the negative-energy requirement for the Alcubierre drive.
Except that they're not. So there's that.You are absolutely welcome to your opinion. I stand by mine that I find it annoying that creative choices are dictated by a 50 year old show.
You probably should have read the entire article.
At the close of his original article,[5] however, Alcubierre argued (following an argument developed by physicists analyzing traversable wormholes[6][7]) that the Casimir vacuum between parallel plates could fulfill the negative-energy requirement for the Alcubierre drive.
And no, you haven't done actual research on the subject, and I can tell you haven't because you didn't even know why the distinction I originally made is so important.
Except that they're not. So there's that.
That is wise.Yeah, I'm not gonna play the 'Yes it is! No it's not!' game with you...
I liked it, and was quite surprised that they did it. It underscored his humanity and individuality.Just me, but it left a bit of a bad taste when Pike started to say the Lord's PrPrayer.
Your right, and I appreciate all that, I just don't want it in Star Trek.And that the future will still contain faith. Yes, we know faith can lead to repression and bloodshed, but the past century has also demonstrated that officially atheist and godless regimes can also bury millions in mass graves, line up scores of innocents against the wall and work them to death in labor camps.
Human failings and extremism are the issue, not faith. Pike's expression was nice to see and did nothing to harm the episode.
As mentioned earlier in the thread, Pike having a religion was part of his backstory going back to Disco S2. Indeed, in the original "science vs faith" storyline Harberts and Berg had planned for that season, Pike was meant to be much more religious than he has become now and we would have seen him praying on a regular basis throughout that season. Plus this episode was written and ready to film back in 2023, well before the current real world drama involving Paramount, so this was likely an attempt to incorporate the religious side of Pike's character hinted at previously rather than an attempt to appease That Crowd.Your right, and I appreciate all that, I just don't want it in Star Trek.
With everything going on with Paramount and Skydance in the news, my immediate thought, rightly or wrongly was this about making someone happy rather than having anything to do with the show.
I know this in not the place for politics.
It's about Pike's character and background.With everything going on with Paramount and Skydance in the news, my immediate thought, rightly or wrongly was this about making someone happy rather than having anything to do with the show.
This is not uncommon in Trekdom.Your right, and I appreciate all that, I just don't want it in Star Trek.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.