Please don't wake that guy up.Canadian charts?
Strange New Worlds Season 2 Trailer
- Thread starter gvn2fly
- Start date
Based on what?
Based on what? Sources please.
So you're taking the entire company problems and dumping them on the Trek shows? You do realize that Trek isn't the only shows on that network right?
Last edited:
I painfully wait for Tulsa KIng S2.
There's a picture posted on the board somewhere, a still frame from a blink-and-you-miss it promo, I believe.
Why then use klingons? Yhey could create new species, and make them anything they like! Isn't familiarity the point of using same species?
Visually and in terms of production tech, it definitely is. Citing some bit of in-universe narrative is not a worthwhile argument against changing it.
Here's my bigger question-why should we care? No, seriously, why should I as an average fan care about Paramount's financial troubles? Thus far, when I ask the question it comes back to either a popularity contest (subjective and debatable) or proof of failure (argumentative and a nonstarter).
Unless I have a financial interest in Paramount's workings (spoiler alert: I don't) then the company's finances are quite literally none of my business.
I have a hard time finding a reason to care other than "oh, teh noes, what if no new Trek is made." And right now I'm fine with the announced amount of content and am not sure I'd be terribly upset if it were scaled back.
Indeed. And if that's my biggest problem in the world then I'm sitting pretty here.
I feel like this is a prime example of first world problems at its absurdist.
I did without new Trek for almost 12-1/2 years except for three films spaced out over seven years of that period. I lived. I thrived in the fan community. I found ways to be happy and be a contributor to discussions.
We'll live if Paramount has financial troubles.
We'll live if Paramount has financial troubles.
But muh SNW/LD/PROD/maybe Legacy!!
If they don't do the adventures of Captain Seven and ensign Picard, I will riot in bed. Under my sheets. Alone. Maybe.
If I don't get the zombified corpse of Shaw commanding Seven on a mission to save the galaxy from the great-grandspawn of the robotic AI tentacles from PIC Season 1 then I will boycott the whole galaxy.*
*terms subject to change.
*terms subject to change.
If Seven can resurrect Neelix with her nanoprobes then she can probe Shaw back to life. Magic hands make for magic times, especially when you have prehensile tubes.
My new band name.
I mean, I would argue that having access to the financial situation of large multinational corporations is in the interests of everyone who lives in a democracy, since such corporations are extremely powerful and capable of influencing the government to an extent normal citizens are not.
But also my argument there is getting pretty far away from the question of why Paramount+'s performance matters for the purposes of Star Trek fandom.
Sure, she could. She could ask the Guardian of Forever to undo his necrosis and revive him. She could give him some of Khan's magic blood. She could do any one of a million plot devices the writers could pull out of their asses to resurrect Shaw.
It's still a terrible idea that makes it harder and harder and harder to engage with Star Trek on any kind of artistic level.
I love Shaw.
And he needs to stay dead.
And he needs to stay dead.
Similar threads
