• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 1x03 - "Ghosts of Illyria"

Hit it!


  • Total voters
    223
Not as good as the last two episodes but still highly enjoyable.

I love SNW. By far, it's the best of the new live action shows.

Strange New Worlds


Picard








Discovery
 
I think neither DIS nor PIC had terribly bad writers (okay, some of the speeches and dialogue on PIC WAS bad).
IMO the problem was the lack of organising a cohesive story and vision.

It's difficult enough to write a single episode for television, and it's easy enough to fuck that up. Writing dozens of connected episodes is a nightmare, and takes some real commitment from the higher ups and a very clear & concise vision communicated between dozens of writers and stories. And that was just not there, that's why the plots just fizzled out after each season premiere.

Ironically, I think it's exactly that hands-off approach from the higher ups that SNW really profits from, since every episode is allowed to have a clear, distinctive voice & direction, and the writers are allowed the write what they care about in their stories without it throwing the main arc of a season off-course
 
Brannon Braga could pen complete garbage but he also penned some of the better episodes of TNG, VOY and ENT. He was all over the map but then that's most professional writers. You're not always going to knock your story out of the ballpark and once you've been on the job for so many years the ratio of winners to losers is going to change and not always in the best direction.
 
Whoever is writing the music deserves huge props. It’s basically TOS style musical cues seamlessly transitioned to a modern context.

Well done.
TOS music is damned amazing, too. It was as essential a part of the show as the actors and sets. Later series toned it down, which is, on the whole, a damned shame.

Come on. Fans write way better stuff all the time...

:rommie:

Ok, I couldn't keep a straight face on that one.
Yeah. Fans generally have a very indistinct idea of what they'd like, but they couldn't make that into a commercially-successful episode if their lives depended on it. Worse still, they get angry at the actual writers when they feel the real episodes don't live up to their vague expectations...
 
(Disclaimer in advance : I still love this show & very much liked this episode. Just not this part: )

:bolian: Totally fair. I'm probably going to argue a bit against what you say here, but I appreciate that these are thoughtful critiques and not just haterade.

M'Benga's secret is exactly as "dark" as Una's:
It's not their own fault, they're actually good people yada yada, and in oldTrek none of these would be an issue as the Federation would help with their resources.

Well, I suppose I would indeed argue that neither M'Benga's nor Una's secrets are dark. I would consider them dramatic secrets but not dark.

And I don't know that the Federation in oldTrek would have helped with M'Benga's child by essentially "freezing" her in a transporter. We've never heard of anyone from the TNG or TOS era essentially freezing a loved one with a terminal illness long-term, whether in a transporter or in cryogenic freeze or stasis. McCoy didn't freeze his dad, for instance.

I'm sure there are Federation scientists trying to cure her disease back on UFP worlds.

But at the same time - they absolutely lied to get on board, Una must have had faked a shit-ton of medical examinations, the doctor sneaked a freakin' child in a box on board & told nobody that turning the power of will kill her and both basically put other people's trust and life at risk.

I believe the implication is that nobody else's life is at risk, only Rukiya's.

In nuTrek the Federation is always dumb, prejudicial, and it comes down to the strong man defying stupid regulations. That's too easy.

I don't agree with that assessment. There have definitely been times when the Federation did dumb or prejudicial stuff, but there have also been plenty of times it hasn't. It was Michael whose prejudice helped ignite the Federation-Klingon War in S1, for instance; Federation principles might have avoided conflict if Michael hadn't attacked the Torchbearer. It was Section 31 that unleashed Control and almost got everyone killed in S2, and it was Starfleet proper that saved everyone. Pike may have violated General Order 1 by revealing himself to the Kyleans, but he preserved the intent of the order by refusing to intervene any further than telling the Kyleans what had happened to Earth in WW3, and his actions in "Children of the Comet" were framed as the Federation's will rather than defiance of the UFP's will. The Federation is absolutely framed as doing the right thing most of the time in DIS S3 and S4 -- the Federation's rejection of Emerald Chain greed is vindicated, and its rejection of aggression and embrace of diplomacy towards Species 10-C is depicted as absolutely the right thing in S4.

Honestly I don't think modern ST depicts the Federation as a power structure as being in the wrong any more often than TNG, DS9, or VOY did back in the day.

Also, not EVERY freakin' character needs a dramatic backstory! It's allowed to just have professionals on board doing an interesting but dangerous job.

I just can't relate to this criticism. I would generally err on the side of characters with interesting backstories than ones without. But so far, Ortegas, Chapel, and Hemmer all just seem like professionals doing their jobs -- no dramatic backstories as far as we can see.

Yes. But it messes with the whole "Federation discriminates against outsiders"-thing this episode was going for. They're clearly on good terms with Denobulans from ENT to LD.

Yeah, that's part of why I interpret the Illyrians as Humans. To me it makes more sense that Earthers would feel entitled to discriminate and "other" the Illyrians if they're a nation of Humans who left Earth to practice genetic augmentation than if they're aliens.

And sorry for being harsh - but sneaking a child on board that can accidentally be killed by someone else pushing the wrong button, and then endangering the whole crew to protect that secret, makes him utterly unfit to work on a starship & he should be released from duty. (But Starfleet scientists should still working with him to find a cure back on earth).

Well, we know from TOS that by the 2268, he's serving aboard the Enterprise again but he's no longer CMO. So that strongly implies to me that he's going to face some sort of accountability for his decision to smuggle Rukiya aboard but that the punishment won't include expulsion or imprisonment. Which I think sounds reasonable, and speaks to the Federation as a more just organization in modern ST than you were arguing.

But still. Not a good look. And especially not a good introduction to the character.

Oh, I liked it! I can relate to a guy willing to break a large bureaucracy's rules more than I can to a company man.

The consistency of Klingon and Romulan appearance, then.

Totally fair point! Like I said, it's completely legitimate to interpret the SNW Illyrians as the same species as the ENT Illyrians. I don't share that interpretation but it's totally legit.
 
Honestly I don't think modern ST depicts the Federation as a power structure as being in the wrong any more often than TNG, DS9, or VOY did back in the day.
Except the admitals, of course. They're always evil.

I just can't relate to this criticism. I would generally err on the side of characters with interesting backstories than ones without. But so far, Ortegas, Chapel, and Hemmer all just seem like professionals doing their jobs -- no dramatic backstories as far as we can see.
Personally I prefer things balanced a bit: some characters with interesting pasts, others with interesting parts to play in the present, instead.

But let's not forget how TNG started with everybody's backstories.
 
Last edited:
Personally I prefer things balanced a bit: some characters with interesting pasts, others with interesting parts to play in the present, instead.

Which strikes me as broadly what SNW has,

But let's not forget how TNG started with everybody's backstories.

True!

Picard: In love with best friend's wife, best friend dies under his command, ship gets destroyed and then his girlfriend betrays him at the court-martial
Riker: Mother dead, estranged father
LaForge: Fine
Data: Creator disappeared and colony destroyed, evil twin tries to kill him multiple times
Worf: Parents killed and colony destroyed, raised by Humans, torn between the Federation and Klingon Empire
Yar: Parents abandoned her, grew up on planet with no government, subjected to sexual violence from street gangs
Troi: Father dead, later we learn of a secret dead sister
Beverly and Wesley: Husband/father died under Picard's command

Lots of tragedy in the TNG backstory even before PIC's revelations about Picard's early life!
 
And most of that jammed into the first episode, more than a little awkwardly.

DS9, by comparison, did it WAY better in its own pilot.

I think EP03 of SNW did it a bit too much, but let's keep things in perspective. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sci
Not much I can add 40 pages in. Just thought this was a meh episode. Wasn’t a fan of either Una or M’Bengas revelations and the B-plot with Pike and Spock felt undercooked. Like, they either needed to do more with it or kill it.
 
They shouldn't bother making Pure DVD players anymore.

BluRay Players are all Backward Compatible with DVD's.

So manufacturers should only make Blu-Ray Players that are all backward compatible with DVD's.

Simplifies logistics and all that.

If they can sell bluray/dvd player composite players for the same price as the cheapest dvd player that might work.

200 dollars Bluray player from America or 30 dollar dvd player from China.

That's called capitalism, because there's more than one manufacturer.

And even if there's a monopoly, internally the divisions of a large company are separate and at war with each other to look good for the board and get the big year end bonus.
 
Well, the goal by both the corporations and the state is for the plebes to own as little personal property and wealth as possible, effectively turning a human being into the equivalent of a gerbil on a hamster wheel, to be fed, taking care of and "processed" as such.

I think I just rolled my eyeballs into the next STATE. :rolleyes: :lol:

srsly, I personally have just never felt the need to own a lot of stuff. I don’t need “corporations” or some mythical “state” to tell me that. I’ve always been fairly minimalist.

The way I see it is, given that I have to subscribe to streaming services anyway (otherwise I would not be able to see current Trek), why not make the most of it? Paramount+ has every Trek series in existence, so why NOT rely on it? It’s not going anywhere. I just don’t see any personal need to own a lot of “discs” when I can get the same stuff included with the service I already have.

I have the same attitude towards the various L&O series. I have to subscribe to Peacock to see new episodes of SVU, OC and the mothership, so logically, why own physical versions of what that service can already get for me? (In the interest of full disclosure, I do own the first twelve seasons of the mothership on DVD, because Peacock doesn’t carry them.)
 
Last edited:
Not much I can add 40 pages in. Just thought this was a meh episode. Wasn’t a fan of either Una or M’Bengas revelations and the B-plot with Pike and Spock felt undercooked. Like, they either needed to do more with it or kill it.
Splitting the reveals into 2 episodes might've given Pike and Spock to do, and would've allowed them to expand a bit on the virus A plot.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top