I was assuming the original topic expanded to include any non-white female lead. My bad.
So, in the end, the whole point of this thread was to find a backdoor approach for a single poster to continue to express their irrational hatred of Natalie Portman. Got it.
I’d like to see an Ironheart movie.
And I really want to see Storm finally done right. She was worshipped as a goddess, actually depict her as being worthy of it. Someone like Beyoncé, cast her.
I don't think she's in danger of running out. Especially since she can still dress up as Ariel or Squirrel Girl if she wants to.
Also, good effort on the math, I guess, but it isn't particularly relevant.
I’d like to see an Ironheart movie.
And I really want to see Storm finally done right. She was worshipped as a goddess, actually depict her as being worthy of it. Someone like Beyoncé, cast her.
And I really want to see Storm finally done right. She was worshipped as a goddess, actually depict her as being worthy of it. Someone like Beyoncé, cast her.
Please no, since its inception Hollywood only seems to find eurocentric looking, fair skinned black women acceptable.
No, no, no to all Beyonce, Halle Berry, Mariah Carey or Vanessa Williams lookalikes.
Storm is from Africa use someone who fits the average African phenotype.
Misogyny is not a new word.It's not "time for a black female lead".
It's time for a good character. If that character happens to be black, fine.
If that character happens to be female, fine.
If that character happens to be both, fine.
But by saying it's time that a character HAS to be of a certain demographic or gender identity, you are just buying into EVERYTHING that is wrong with Hollywood today. We had strong female characters LONG before those three words, "strong female character" were used together as a label to promote an agenda.. in fact, we had them before agendas. I read Tim Miller's comments about the new Terminator character Grace, and how she would scare the shit of of the misogynists.. and it got me thinking, back when there were no characters better than Ellen Ripley, Lindsey Brigman, or Sarah Connor, I had not even heard of the word "misogyny"
As much as I love watching Lupita, expand the casting, find even more Lupitas for roles. Otherwise it would be like giving every major movie role to Meryl Streep in her heyday and ignoring all the other available white female actors. (They did a similar thing with Halle Berry, want to cast a black female - call Halle Berry, she's the only one that exists.)Beyonce is overrated (insert shocked gasp!)
it will be Lupita Nyong'o, I'd put money on it.
Of course it's not a new word. I never said it was. I'm just saying it was never an issue, or an agenda or anything like that before. Filmmakers just made their films.Misogyny is not a new word.
Would you rather we said 'its time for the Western entertainment industry to stop assuming only white human males (or females) exist in the universe'?
I had not even heard of the word "misogyny"
I'm just saying it was never an issue,
Does it rhyme with 'the only humans who go to the cinema are white males'?I guess you never heard 'male privilege' either...![]()
Uh, yeah....no.Of course it's not a new word. I never said it was. I'm just saying it was never an issue, or an agenda or anything like that before. Filmmakers just made their films.
The history of cinema shows otherwise.my point is that story comes first. not the demographic, not the agenda. You don't make a movie to serve an agenda, you make ti to tell the story
The demographic Hollywood served from the beginning did not include nonwhites. There is a reason such films as Birth of a Nation exists. Production wise good, story wise, racist as hell!my point is that story comes first. not the demographic, not the agenda. You don't make a movie to serve an agenda, you make ti to tell the story
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.