No.Maybe the larger size is really the mistake?
No.Maybe the larger size is really the mistake?
No it isn't.Maybe the larger size is really the mistake?
Maybe the larger size is really the mistake?
No it isn't.
Nope.
probably just googling connie specs. Or memory-alphaAnd yet they keep using the old stats. How hard is it for these people to get this right?
Exactly. Not everyone in the production is a hard-core Trekkie and has the length of ships memorized. Someone was probably told to make a graphic and put the dimensions on it, and the first dimensions they found online were the TOS ones.probably just googling connie specs. Or memory-alpha
They also misspelled "2244-present" as "2244-preset" on its In Service status. These readouts are still not made to stand up to the level of scrutiny that we give them.And yet they keep using the old stats. How hard is it for these people to get this right?
These readouts are still not made to stand up to the level of scrutiny that we give them.
They still do that on the modern shows to a fair extent. I always kind of hated it because it's too nonsensical, there's no way actual people can derive anything of use from it.This is why the Berman shows used random strings of numbers. If you make something readable someone will try to read it.
well to be fair "bridges must be visible for a sense of scale" technically is a design "rule", and "engineering/shuttle/cargo must fit inside the hull" technically isn'tIt's what the bridge window and sets are scaled to. Engineering requires even bigger though![]()
That's because no one knows what the data should be. Otherwise they'd be somewhere building spaceships instead of working in TV.They still do that on the modern shows to a fair extent. I always kind of hated it because it's too nonsensical, there's no way actual people can derive anything of use from it.
And yet they keep using the old stats. How hard is it for these people to get this right?
It's also not important. It's not as if people are walking on screen constantly mentioning how long the ship is. Let it go and just either enjoy the episodes or don't watch if it bothers you that much.
422m..... this is getting comicalTimothy deleted his old tweet and posted one with the ‘correct’ SNW Connie dimensions. Also made the launch date 2245
https://twitter.com/timothypeel1/status/1690351955002945537?s=46&t=GJ4lIGndtLwuph_LJO2AJw
he fixed it.. again422m..... this is getting comical
3rd times the charm.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.