Wonderful logic. "It's for your own good!"
Maybe you need to go back and rewatch the ep. because that's exactly what he tells Picard he's doing it for.
A. That was a horrible ret-con B. there's nothing in TNG to indicate that's so, which is what we have to judge Picard on. And even so, people still died in Q-Who, and there's no denying Locutus had a hand in Wolf 359.
Pretending it isn't true doesn't make it so.
The Trek Universe is bigger than what just happens in TNG.
The same writers/producers wrote TNG just as the did Voy.
So they say what is canon, not us.
I'm sure when you're responsible for 1000 people it must be a real consolation that your life is in the hands of an whimsically irresponsible omnipotent being who seems to love using fear and violence to teach you "lessons." I love Q and think his episodes were some of TNG's best, but it's silly to ridicule Picard for being hostile towards him. __________________
On Earth we call it politics.
We've gotten so numb to it we believe they're necessary evils.
I believe Q told Picard in "Farpoint", that the Federation shouldn't be exploring the unknown if they can't handle what's out there. (That's called a warning) Part of what's out there is Q. If we can't deal with the Q, how do we ever expect to deal with beings worse than them? It's also arrogant and nieve to explore the "wilderness" and think you're not going to encounter hostiles. Lets stop pretending that Picard and his crew are civilians out for a walk in the woods. These are military officers that understand dead is part of the job. They understand this when they take their oath.
If Q warns Picard not to do something and Picard still does it, is it Q's fault?