Sportin' the MU chinstrap!![]()
Ngl not 100% on Spock's SNW look

Sportin' the MU chinstrap!![]()
Ngl not 100% on Spock's SNW look
Probably not the first time.So, why do the graphics displays show the Enterprise having straight TOS pylons?
The more I see - the more I REALLY like what is being shown of this show.Lt. Erica Ortegas teaser.
They're not. The small resolution was just hiding the angle.So, why do the graphics displays show the Enterprise having straight TOS pylons?
I think that's what the series will be: standalone episodes. That's what they were saying from the beginning that this would be a more traditional type series with standalone episodes.Please have more stand alone episodes!
Excellent news. Gives them more opportunities to be creative.I think that's what the series will be: standalone episodes. That's what they were saying from the beginning that this would be a more traditional type series with standalone episodes.
Bottom of the saucer still doesn't have an undercut, unfortunately.
Everything edge etc. lighted on the bridge looks very dance-friendly
So, why do the graphics displays show the Enterprise having straight TOS pylons?
Yes, I did and I still hold to that. Pike has always been my favorite character. There is such a thing as too many legacy characters, and it diminishes my view of the whole, even if Pike is a character I have wanted a show about for a long time.
It's partially small universe syndrome, but it's mostly just feels workman like, like we are hitting off the checkmarks to make sure it is "Trek Enough" to satisfy the requirements. It also creates a lot of expectations of how the characters are supposed to be rather than new characters who can be more accepted as is.What is the crux of your opinion about why legacy characters diminish a show? Is it small universe syndrome?
I hate you for this.![]()
Ngl not 100% on Spock's SNW look
I pretty much agree. Seems fanwankerish. But — Uhura, MBenga, Chapel, heck all aside from the Big 3.5 were almost ciphers and any developing of them isn’t going to trouble much. As far as Kirk later, yup that was catnip you knew they couldn’t ignore.It's partially small universe syndrome, but it's mostly just feels workman like, like we are hitting off the checkmarks to make sure it is "Trek Enough" to satisfy the requirements. It also creates a lot of expectations of how the characters are supposed to be rather than new characters who can be more accepted as is.
Right. It is one of those things that it seems minor at first, but little things become big. Starting with Pike, Spock and Number One should have been sufficient. It wasn't. They added more. And I think it was unnecessary and now feels more checkmark rather than organic.I pretty much agree. Seems fanwankerish. But — Uhura, MBenga, Chapel, heck all aside from the Big 3.5 were almost ciphers and any developing of them isn’t going to trouble much. As far as Kirk later, yup that was catnip you knew they couldn’t ignore.
You say that except...there are small data points that will be held against these actors just like the familiar characters. Regardless of how brief there comes an expectation of this character to be exactly the same. Pike has managed because Mount has charmed people and there is a measure forgiveness. But, that grace is very thin, at least for me.I don't know. I'm all for - Pike, M'Benga, No. 1, even Chapel: They're essentially blank slates with familiar names.
You say that except...there are small data points that will be held against these actors just like the familiar characters. Regardless of how brief there comes an expectation of this character to be exactly the same. Pike has managed because Mount has charmed people and there is a measure forgiveness. But, that grace is very thin, at least for me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.