1. TOS
2. DSC
3. TMP
4. ST09
2. DSC
3. TMP
4. ST09
I thought the one thing that's clear is that things are not overwritten. Have you seen the inside of the E&Dprise? It was also the wrong Enterprise refit, IIRC (the A was not in SFS). A recast is necessary for actors who don't make sense age-wise anymore or aren't available. No recast of sets, props, or ships is necessary.Did everyone forget "Ephraim and Dot"? The Discovery version of the design overwrote the TOS one in that episode, leading into the unchanged classic movie design.
They recast the ship just like they did Pike and Spock. If you're gonna come up with diagrams to explain refits, I'd like some to show exactly what plastic surgery Ethan Peck has to look exactly like Leonard Nimoy.
see, that explains everything. some don't see things, others do, some pay more attention to things that others don't even notice, and then the non-seeing tell the seeing how wrong they are XDSeriously, I wouldn't even know the differences unless I knew what to look for.
[...]
Even canon purist extraordinaire Bernd Schneider had to admit that the TOS-to-TMP refit itself only works if the neck and the pylons were completely removed and replaced.
And some people can have an attention to detail and still accept a close enough updated redesign of a production asset as representing the same starship in a different production because their suspension of disbelief doesn't hinge on it looking exactly like its original design with HD textures, and consequently, they don't require an in-universe explanation for every redesign, continuity or VFX error, even if they acknowledge them.see, that explains everything. some don't see things, others do, some pay more attention to things that others don't even notice, and then the non-seeing tell the seeing how wrong they are XD
I do like the Kelvin 1701-A better than the Kelvin Enterprise from the first two movies. The nacelles being smaller and less steroid-pumped in proportions helps a great deal.
It just doesn't work for a modern 21st century TV series.
Like I said before, I can more easily see the DSC Enterprise becoming the TMP Enterprise.
Glorified fan service, nothing more.Trials and Tribbleations.
It is if you want new fans to take it seriously.No recast of sets, props, or ships is necessary.
Well Star Trek isn’t real life. That isn’t comparable.But you aren’t going to go back to a movie like Bullitt, insert a modern Charger to that classic car chase and say that’s how the car always looked.
Glorified fan service, nothing more.
SNW is an entire TV series, not a single episode.
It is if you want new fans to take it seriously.
They’re not making this show for old fans, they’re also making it for the new fans that came on with DSC, and to attract new fans.
What exactly makes this one difficult to take seriously, what about it would repel new fans, and why would your friends dismiss this?I have two friends considering watching Star Trek for the first time with Strange New Worlds and I reckon they'd have dismissed it pretty quickly if it looked like something made in the 1960s.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.