They were high as Hell but they understood an attractive TV image. 

NBC owned RCA at the time and wanted to sell color TVs. Thus they wanted A LOT of color in their color programs of the 1960s.They were high as Hell but they understood an attractive TV image.![]()
NBC owned RCA at the time and wanted to sell color TVs. Thus they wanted A LOT of color in their color programs of the 1960s.
They were high as Hell but they understood an attractive TV image.![]()
MaybeThat explains a lot...
The only people who were higher than Star Trek back then:
It was a discofied Enterprise thoughWhich was rather glaring, IMO. They spend Disco's first season completely redesigning Starfleet's visual wheel and tell the complaining fans "visuals aren't canon" then in the second season the completely trip over themselves disregarding that design aesthetic and lineage to make the Enterprise as visually similar to TOS as possible.
Which was rather glaring, IMO. They spend Disco's first season completely redesigning Starfleet's visual wheel and tell the complaining fans "visuals aren't canon" then in the second season the completely trip over themselves disregarding that design aesthetic and lineage to make the Enterprise as visually similar to TOS as possible.
I'm gonna guess that came from Laugh-In.
I think you just nailed my issue with the new Enterprise bridge. Basically it all looks like it just came off the assembly line and probably even still has that new ship smell. But the problem is the ship is old. It's already had a 5 year mission under Robert April and I am guessing maybe another 5 under Pike. We are talking about a decade old ship.I hope they reduce the shine and glare for the ongoing series. Make the floor a little more matte and dim some of the ceiling lights, maybe. (Would love some colored gels over the ceiling lights, like in TOS, but I dare hope for only so much.)
I kinda think they’ll have to do something with the floor. That high-gloss finish would be a nightmare to keep clean in HD.
If you go with the "bridge modules can be replaced" theory, then it doesn't matter how old the ship is. Either that, or Starfleet routinely renovates select ships following five year missions.I think you just nailed my issue with the new Enterprise bridge. Basically it all looks like it just came off the assembly line and probably even still has that new ship smell. But the problem is the ship is old. It's already had a 5 year mission under Robert April and I am guessing maybe another 5 under Pike. We are talking about a decade old ship.
I believe that there was mention of it shinning like the top of the Chrysler Building, and that does somewhat resemble a roundish knob.![]()
Yeah, but IIRC it was a one off thing, it couldn't be reattached without a starbase.I think in the tech Manuels it was said the TOS Enterprise could do this
I mean, that would make sense. Mission profiles change, computers get updated, etc, etc.If you go with the "bridge modules can be replaced" theory, then it doesn't matter how old the ship is. Either that, or Starfleet routinely renovates select ships following five year missions.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.