Other than what has been shared that it will be more episodic stories, but serialized character development that's about it.Anyway, on about SNW. I continue to hope it'll be more episodic than DSC. Has there been any information about the format?
Other than what has been shared that it will be more episodic stories, but serialized character development that's about it.Anyway, on about SNW. I continue to hope it'll be more episodic than DSC. Has there been any information about the format?
It's been touted as being heavily episodic since it was announced. Though with character arcs running through.Anyway, on about SNW. I continue to hope it'll be more episodic than DSC. Has there been any information about the format?
Maybe the screen automatically rotates to match the way it's held.Hey, everyone's bothered by something or other. I'd love to be able to not care about that scene in TNG where the guest star is holding the tricorder upside down. For pete's sake, talk about unimportant!
Other than what has been shared that it will be more episodic stories, but serialized character development that's about it.
It's been touted as being heavily episodic since it was announced. Though with character arcs running through.
Maybe the screen automatically rotates to match the way it's held.
Your own rant basically destroys your point. Spock NEVER talks bout his family in advance. This is ABSOLUTELY in character for Spock has he has been portrayed from early in TOS through to The Final Frontier. Using that to highlight you point is utterly ridiculous.So, one thing I already know that I am going to dislike about this show is how Spock, Uhura, Chapel are the only 3 main characters we see in TOS. And it is obvious in strange new worlds, Spock would have lots of interaction, friendship and maybe even a one off romance thing with at least one of them or maybe both, but somehow when TOS happens. Spock barely interacts with them, instead he, McCoy and Kirk are all stuck together like the 3 Musketeers.
This kind of inconsistency has always irked me about prequels story and I am guessing we are about to see this in some of the worst ways in strange new worlds, giving the fact that Alex Kurtzman and his team. judging from star trek discovery are not the greatest of writers not to mention just how terrible and poorly characterized Michael Burnham is as a character. The sister Spock never told us about. Also the child who was more important to Sarek than his own biological sons.![]()
okay.
I get it, you are a discovery fan and no offence all your replies to me, I am beginning to find it quite condensing and sarcastic. Maybe it just my own POV but that is what I am getting and I dont like to put people on ignore, however I may have no choice here.
Discovery is just a bad show, it is poorly written front and back that can be proven on many objective tv writing grounds, especially when you compare it to a show like TNG, one of the most compelling and intellectual sci-fi shows of all time and the michael story is a big contributing factor to the poor quality of discovery because her character breaks so many grounds of the trek universe that weakens the story telling and even the lore of star trek. I have watched star trek for decades and the lore has never made anyone so centre of the universe as they do with Michael supported by CW level writing plot.
The sarcasm replies, only heightened my trust that discovery is terrible since that is the way bad shows are usually defended because there is no substance to defend with. I just hope Strange new worlds can be better and watchable enough since it has many familiar faces in main roles including very iconic characters like Uhura and Spock.
The John Eaves straight pylon and TOS hull color version of the Enterprise looks so good. I wish it's what we were getting even now(except for the row of illumination lights on the upper hull of the saucer, those needed to go in any iteration).
![]()
Just to be clear, I don't thank Discovery or Picard have produced a single episode as bad as the very worst episodes from TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY or ENT. In my mind its not even close. If I rank the worst 50 episodes of Trek (live action) Discovery and Picard are the only two series that don't get an entry (though one from Picard gets close).
But on the flip side. I also thank the best episode of Picard and Discovery haven't reached the heights of the very best episodes of TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY or ENT. And the reverse If I do a ranking of my top 50 episodes of live action Trek, Discovery and Picard don't make a single entry (if I expand to 60 one from each make it).
I find Discovery (and Picard to a lesser degree) tend to fall in the poor to pretty good range. I find them probably the most consistent quality wise. And just so you know I don't consider that necessarily a good thing.
Generally a Great episode makes me far more willing to put up with a really awful episode.
DSC ships are badass, save for the Crossfield class. The rest I prefer even more than most of the 25th century. Second favorite era.
IIRC, M'Benga holds the scanner upside down here as wellHey, everyone's bothered by something or other. I'd love to be able to not care about that scene in TNG where the guest star is holding the tricorder upside down. For pete's sake, talk about unimportant!
The problem is that they're scanning themselves instead of the cave or the patientMaybe the screen automatically rotates to match the way it's held.
IIRC, the novelization of TFF had that line as a direct reference to Sam. The dialogue in the movie made it seem like he was talking about Spock.I always look at Kirk's line at the end of TFF as a winking reference to Sam but then he surprises the audience by saying he's referring to Spock. I doubt Shatner and Bennett forgot Kirk had an older brother who died a tragic death in TOS. That episode was well-known.
But that doesn't count as revealing a family member, which is what's being discussed.
Seriously, exactly. From http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/44.htm:I don’t agree with that assessment at all. Kirk is surprised to learn Sarek and Amanda are Spock’s parents when he’s standing in front of all three, it was a reveal of both his parents’ identities, and is part of a pattern of behavior where details about Spock’s family and history have consistently been portrayed as surprising to his shipmates on the Enterprise.
Jesus (and Surak)! Surely, Spock must have been seriously records-erasing traumatized guy!Seriously, exactly. From http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/44.htm:
KIRK: Our pleasure, madam. As soon as you're settled I'll arrange a tour of the ship. Mister Spock will conduct you.
SAREK: I'd prefer another guide, Captain.
KIRK: As you wish, Ambassador. Mister Spock, we'll leave orbit in two hours. Would you care to beam down and visit your parents?
SPOCK: Captain, Ambassador Sarek and his wife are my parents.
Oh, by the way, I neglected to mention, the Ambassador who we just made a special trip to pick up? He's my dad. And his wife? She's my mom. As a matter of fact, I don't need to beam down to visit my parents at all, because they happen to be standing right here!![]()
Maybe it was yet another son.![]()
just kept using the one that was in disco and while it wasn't perfect at least it was better than the very dated looking giant slab of gray that we gotWhat would you do differently?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.