• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Strange New Worlds General Discussion Thread

Please change those asymmetrical collars.

My favourite TOS inspired uniforms are the ones from Beyond, those ones were a perfect update imo.
Obviously its subjective but I liked the TOS inspired uniforms from Star Trek 09/Into Darkness.
On another note, how long do you think it'll be before we get to see set/costume/prop photos?
 
Let's think back to Best of Both Worlds, and the follow ups Family and First Contact.

Characters can be deepened and more fleshed out, if they grow and evolve from their experiences. And with the Episodic structure back - those experiences can be more varied.

Kirk accepting his aging, but determined to not give in to it
Picard coping with his assimilation experiences (they should have followed up with his torturing too but they didnt)
Sisco adapting to his role as Emissary
Janeway's depression looking back at her past decisions
Archer learning to drop his antagonism and prejudices

Oh, I’ve always argued that Trek has been serialised as far back as TNG (Worf being the most glaringly obvious example, but all of the characters have it) and this is usually when listening to daft attacks on Voyager for not having enough of it (because the modern ‘one long story’ approach is/was particularly in vogue.) and usually described as not having any.

The fact they are switching back to it as a tried and true set up for Trek can only highlight how much it’s always been there.
 
The collars on the DSC uniforms are garbage. I hope they become TOS- and Kelvin Timeline-style black collars without tabs for SNW.
 
Wow, so Goldsman's finally admitting how fucked the writing has been on STD?

I thought he was referring to PIC. Hm.

You would think without the BTS turmoil, and Chabon -- I think -- overseeing the writing, the whole serial would be plotted in advance.

Do other ppl think he was referring to DSC or PIC?
 
All Goldsman said regarding Discovery was he's not really been involved since Season 1.

Goldsman has a history of blurting out things which are maybe gaffes. I remember right when Picard came out he said it was different from Discovery because Picard was "writing based" and Discovery was "lots of things blowing up."
 
It's basically what I assumed SNW would be based on the way everyone's been talking about it.
Basically DS9 S1-2.
Slow boil character development in basically one-off episodes. I'm not against long form storytelling, but there's something inherently Trek about stand alone shows.
Too much Klingons in Disco 1 & 2
 
Basically DS9 S1-2.
Slow boil character development in basically one-off episodes. I'm not against long form storytelling, but there's something inherently Trek about stand alone shows.
Too much Klingons in Disco 1 & 2
Well SNW only has around 10 episodes IIRC, so character development won't be that slow.
 
Spock: Captain Pike, I see that we are definitely going with the higher cost bridge for our missions.

Pike: Don’t use the word cost, Spock. You’re acting like the Federation is using latinum instead of fitcoins, which can only be mined by us improving our physical and mental wellbeing. The more fitcoins the bridge costs, the more people will have to better themselves.

Spock: Fascinating.

Pike: I swapped out that bridge we used on the Rigel and first Talos missions into quantum storage. I’ll hand it over to my successor. Considering how lazy Starfleet is getting my successor won’t have enough fitcoins on hand to get a fancy bridge, just a dated retro one. Not that I’m complaining. I heard that young kid–whatshisname–Grames Tiberian Quirk, or Kork, or whatever, is angling for my job. The one who cheated on the Kobayashi Maru. Let him have the cheap stuff.
 
I don't recall seeing budget or number of episodes listed anywhere. Hoping we can get it up to 13.
IIRC, they're trying to make ten episodes the new standard for a Star Trek season. I think even Disco season 4 is only ten.
remember the good old days of 26 episode seasons.......
Those days are behind us. Besides, even in the 1990s where seasons with over twenty episodes were the rule, the Star Trek shows were the only ones that did twenty-six, arguably to their detriment.
 
Those days are behind us. Besides, even in the 1990s where seasons with over twenty episodes were the rule, the Star Trek shows were the only ones that did twenty-six, arguably to their detriment.

26 ep seasons were mainly for syndication (to allow for five-days-a-week broadcast).
 
True, the more episodes the more chance of rubbish

however todays trek with less episodes mean less good episodes too,

The difference is, with the fully serialised Trek, its one story, over many episodes. With previous Trek you would have many shorter stories, but some would stand out as brilliant.

So if the one story is bad, it drags all episodes down with it.
 
26 ep seasons were mainly for syndication (to allow for five-days-a-week broadcast).
Even then, most other shows at the time only had 22-24 episodes a season, many of them getting successful syndication packages, quite a few which are still running today in syndication. Twenty-six really was unnecessary.
 
I don't remember most of CBS Trek episodes either. And I dont see myself revisiting them on the occasional basis, b/c of serialization. So it goes.
 
The difference is, with the fully serialised Trek, its one story, over many episodes. With previous Trek you would have many shorter stories, but some would stand out as brilliant.

So if the one story is bad, it drags all episodes down with it.

And even Sub Rosa is somebodies favourite
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top