Because they're temporal ships, and anything even remotely connected to temporal technology is banned.As for Starfleet Academy, I remain baffled why they didn't use the 26th and 29th century Klingon designs over the 2410/2411 ones... I kinda get the M'Chala because it's a "what if the DIS Bird of Prey actually looked like a Klingon Ship" so since it's DIS-inspired I guess I can see why they'd use it in SFA.
Thankfully.Because they're temporal ships, and anything even remotely connected to temporal technology is banned.
Only in STO's canon. They don't have to canonize that element. After all, they changed the Luna-class and its science pod to a warship with a tactical pod. They retconned the Odyssey back to 2386, made the Edison temporal warship a regular ship, made the Shangri La a 2390s design, etc. etc.Because they're temporal ships, and anything even remotely connected to temporal technology is banned.
Agreed! I'd love to the see the Ouroboros-class as a pre-Burn "Starfleet bird-of-prey", or the Talvath-class as a Ni'Var ship.Only in STO's canon. They don't have to canonize that element. After all, they changed the Luna-class and its science pod to a warship with a tactical pod. They retconned the Odyssey back to 2386, made the Edison temporal warship a regular ship, made the Shangri La a 2390s design, etc. etc.
okay...For reference, the 26th century Theseus class was renamed in STO. It is now the Theseus II class.
Reference image + beauty shot because yum yum.
Because they're temporal ships, and anything even remotely connected to temporal technology is banned.
Realistically Klingon ships wouldn't look that different from what they did hundreds of years ago.Despite the huge budget, nobody really wanted to spend half an hour really thinking about what a 32nd century Klingon ship would look like, did they?
Aren't any more vulnerable than if they were attached. In fact it makes them less vulnerable because there's no pylon to attack.The Klingons aren't the Federation after all, they aren't going to cripple their ships survivability to give them disconnected floaty bits.
looks like some sort of render mistake, since none of the others seem to have it.Also, does this bird of prey have an additional structure between the warp pods and wings?
Despite the huge budget, nobody really wanted to spend half an hour really thinking about what a 32nd century Klingon ship would look like, did they?
Realistically Klingon ships wouldn't look that different from what they did hundreds of years ago.
The Klingons aren't the Federation after all, they aren't going to cripple their ships survivability to give them disconnected floaty bits.
Temporal tech being banned is stated by Vance in DIS S3 when Discovery checks in with Starfleet HQ.STO lore has nothing to do with the show.
Yeah, but SFA is not beholden to the lore of the ships in STO. So they could use Temporal ships and just not say they're temporal.Temporal tech being banned is stated by Vance in DIS S3 when Discovery checks in with Starfleet HQ.
Temporal tech being banned is stated by Vance in DIS S3 when Discovery checks in with Starfleet HQ.
Oh, it's guaranteed that they are.The floaty bits don't seem to be a problem for the Federation, so why would it be a problem for the Klingons?
Oh, it's guaranteed that they are.
One energy dampening field or something that blocks whatever teleportation they use to transfer plasma to the nacelles at a distance and the ships would be fucked.
Just like they would be utterly fucked if someone figures out the code key for their programmable matter.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.