And lest we forget the major season 2 plotline that said using the spore drive caused damage to the mycelial network.The spore drive depended upon a species that was extinct in the 32nd century, probably a lot earlier than that, to work.
And lest we forget the major season 2 plotline that said using the spore drive caused damage to the mycelial network.The spore drive depended upon a species that was extinct in the 32nd century, probably a lot earlier than that, to work.
Actually, had they NOT been stuck on trying to make a 4-5 episode amount of material into a 13 episode season, there absolutely would have been room for a couple episodes about a couple worlds doing exactly that.That sounds like a vicious cycle. They have no resources of their own, but have no warp drive to go to get anything they need, but don't have the resources they need to build or research another warp drive. There's probably many such stories like that across the remnants of the Federation, but the show doesn't have the episode space to tell every one of those stories.
Actually, if I recall correctly, it was ultimately revealed that it was Culber's presence in the mycelium network that was damaging it, not the use of the spore drive.And lest we forget the major season 2 plotline that said using the spore drive caused damage to the mycelial network.
One thing does top the list above them. "Subspace Rhapsody"... most ridiculous and laughable thing the franchise ever did.Star Trek does a lot of patently ridiculous and laughable things, but spore drives and The Burn being at or near the top of that long list? Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
Oh that's right!Actually, if I recall correctly, it was ultimately revealed that it was Culber's presence in the mycelium network that was damaging it, not the use of the spore drive.
Hahahahahaha, oh please, as if a space amoeba, Abraham Lincoln, space hippies, warp 10 lizards, and Dr. Crusher fucking a candle ghost weren't ridiculous enough.One thing does top the list above them. "Subspace Rhapsody"... most ridiculous and laughable thing the franchise ever did.
Never said those weren't ridiculous (at least, most of that list). But that musical? Definitely tops the list.Oh that's right!
Hahahahahaha, oh please, as if a space amoeba, Abraham Lincoln, space hippies, warp 10 lizards, and Dr. Crusher fucking a candle ghost weren't ridiculous enough.
Hardly, not in comparison to the others.Never said those weren't ridiculous (at least, most of that list). But that musical? Definitely tops the list.
Not in my top 25 at least.Star Trek does a lot of patently ridiculous and laughable things, but spore drives and The Burn being at or near the top of that long list? Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
To some people, absolutely.Hardly, not in comparison to the others.
Well Ackchyually... at least behind the scenes the "transwarp experiment" fits nicely with TNGs revised warp speed scale, implying they got there eventually.Transwarp was abandoned by Starfleet after 2285, much as spore drives were abandoned after 2258. Seems like even older Roddenberry and Bennett era ideas for starship propulsion were one-and-dones, at least within the Federation.
Thats probably one of the biggest things for me. I got over the burn, it could actually make sense if explained properly.Considering the 25th-31st centuries were VERY largely unexplored, there really was no reason to move DISCO to, say, the mid-late 25th century. By that point, a vast majority of the legacy characters of the 24th century would have died out so there would be minimal to zero chance of any canon issues, and you still could look more advanced, visually.
They could even have done The Burn (but definitely NOT the stupid reason for it), and with it still being pretty fresh after a decade or so, I can believe no reliable tech outside warp drive is used because they would still be researching ways to have reliable FTL other than warp.
But after over a century, and nothing? That did suspend disbelief.
It was, among a multitude of other reasons, why DISCO just didn't work. And a vast majority of those reasons came down to the writers. They seemed to be rather creatively bankrupt.
Hell, just start off DISCO in the mid 25th century... about 80 years past TNG. TNG did that being so far past TOS, and it allowed itself to stand on its own. DISCO would have avoided a vast majority of the visual complaints had they gone that route.
Did they actually have a timeline for that? Because from what I remember it was not explained well and it just did not seem to fit within the given time.The show addressed this, and it was a major plotline. The dissolution of the Federation and the deteriorating political situation put a stop to major research into warp drive alternatives. Societies fell inward rather than outward.
Not that hard to believe.
It's worse when you recall that the Federation had alternate faster methods of FTL travel in the 25th century.Quite right Fateor. Other technology strangeness.
When Burnham got to the future the 23rd century Starfleet tech was on the market as collectibles. Yeah right 1000 year old tech is all the rage Lol. Also starfleet still hasnt replaced warp drive and discoverys spore drive is far better than 32nd century warp drive tech. In near 1000 years they havent come up with something better. Geordi's in the 24th century was excited for warp drive potentially being replaced by n the soliton wave. So even in the 24th century they were looking into better tech but 800 years later they're still stuck with warp drive and dilithium crystals while a 23rd century vessel has the spore drive tech which has virtually instantaneous travel and makes 32nd cebtury travel look ancient. Just bad writing all around. Lol
They could have just pulled up the Quantum Drive designs Voyager brought back from the Delta Quadrant.The show addressed this, and it was a major plotline. The dissolution of the Federation and the deteriorating political situation put a stop to major research into warp drive alternatives. Societies fell inward rather than outward.
Not that hard to believe.
It's worse when you recall that the Federation had alternate faster methods of FTL travel in the 25th century.
They could have just pulled up the Quantum Drive designs Voyager brought back from the Delta Quadrant.
Or utilized the Coaxial warp drive technology Voyager brought back from the Delta Quadrant.
Or utilized "Protowarp".
Or generated Subspace Corridors with Xindi technology.
Or gotten Transwarp coil technology from the Borg.
Or used their improved shielding to travel through Geodesic folds.
Thats probably one of the biggest things for me. I got over the burn, it could actually make sense if explained properly.
What got me was, Starfleet was well know for being able engineer out of anything. There were plenty of promising technologies to working and worked on outside warp. They also got a ton of information out of a cosmic super being that would take a few centuries to unravel.
Yet here we are many centuries later and nothing. Disco starfleet is essentially the polar opposite of what they used to be. It was so damn jarring and took me right out of it.
Did they actually have a timeline for that? Because from what I remember it was not explained well and it just did not seem to fit within the given time.
Lower Decks, Genesis wasn't given up.The Genesis device being given up on is the much bigger "shelved" technology.
Oh it's worse, you don't even need Dilithium to travel at Warp, just energy.Same here Elaise. It took me out of the story. It was silly. Stsrfleet of earth let lack of dilithium stop them from coming up with a solution. 150 yesrs is a long time. Ridiculous that they couldn't figure a solution and left the federation for a century and a half. They only cane back when the dilithium cane back. Such bad writing. Sigh.
You don't need to innovate with technology that's been known about 700 years.Starfleet's fears when not knowing the cause would inhibit innovation. They'll sideline any tech not safe enough.
It's not that big of a stretch to me if you realize it's a trauma response.
If they don't trust it they won't use itYou don't need to innovate with technology that's been known about 700 years.
Discovery's science advisors wrote an article on itI got over the burn, it could actually make sense if explained properly.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.