Multiple chambered hearts.Wait, don’t Klingons have multiple hearts? And didn’t a certain character receive a stab to the heart in a bar and survive?
And it's how Duras died.
Multiple chambered hearts.Wait, don’t Klingons have multiple hearts? And didn’t a certain character receive a stab to the heart in a bar and survive?
glad you finally got that I never wrote anything on the contrary.
And here we go again…
There is a concept that’s called reasonable force. If you kick someone trying to rob you that’s usually reasonable force, if you take out a gun and shoot him dead it is not in most jurisdictions.
The makers of the show say otherwise.
Or it can be a process. Things are not black and white.
We don’t really know how things went as of now.
Yeah, in Star Trek a stab to the heart is always fatal.
Wait, don’t Klingons have multiple hearts? And didn’t a certain character receive a stab to the heart in a bar and survive?
most certainly for you, many disagree.
People misjudge. And if someone can’t restrain themselves from killing they definitely shouldn’t be put in the position to do harm.
you don’t know that.
As I wrote already.
This is extremely questionable.
The Klingons had no interest in trying to revive him, though.Multiple chambered hearts.
And it's how Duras died.
on the contrary: like in the episode you seem only to see what you want to see. And you kept pestering me on something that was never an issue and I had already answered several times. Perhaps I should tell you to stop and kill you if you don’t.First off, you only finally directly answered after my second attempt. You kept dancing around it by saying 'no one can kill someone just because they are bothering them'.
You don’t know this is what happened.And regarding reasonable force... you think it's unreasonable force to kill someone with the knife that they themselves are trying to kill you with?
Bold of you to assume I’ve never been in a self-defence situation.I hope you never have to go through such an experience because plenty of people have. That's why it's called self-defense
to you.The makers may have said Dak'Rah's motivation was real, but Robert Wisdom certainly didn't portray it like that. He came off as a smarmy douche.
He obviously thought he could sway M’Benga and didn’t expect to die?And how is it a misjudgment of harassment when someone repeatedly is being asked to leave and be left alone but doesn't?
No really.And the way the scene is shown, with M'Benga near a wall and Dak'Rah at the only exit with the knife on the table directly next to him? Seems pretty clear to me.
Once more, you are only seeing what you want to see into something that’s intentionally left unclear.And it wasn't a case of M'Benga not being able to restrain himself... in a fight for your life, you do whatever it takes to survive
The Klingons had no interest in trying to revive him, though.
on the contrary: like in the episode you seem only to see what you want to see. And you kept pestering me on something that was never an issue and I had already answered several times. Perhaps I should tell you to stop and kill you if you don’t.
You don’t know this is what happened.
And again you are pestering me with questions about things that have nothing to do with the issue here and hat I never questioned.
Bold of you to assume I’ve never been in a self-defence situation.
to you.
He obviously thought he could sway M’Benga and didn’t expect to die?
No really.
Once more, you are only seeing what you want to see into something that’s intentionally left unclear.
And looking at the scene, Dak'Rah was right next to the box with the knife. M'Benga was on the other side of the room.
Given how we see Dak'Rah can just toss him around fairly easily from the fight scene earlier, how M'Benga was not juiced up on Protocol 12, and Dak'Rah's reaction when he discovered M'Benga knew the real truth, and M'Benga saying 'stop', M'Benga was defending himself from an attacker who was going to kill him.
as said by multiple people, and also by the showmakers, the scene is shot in a way to intentionally leave doubt on what happened.The issue IS whether M'Benga was justified in his actions, which is directly linked to my questions of self-defense.
sorry, I lost you here.And you HAVE stated M'Benga was not justified by calling him an unrestrained killer.
Yawhn, here we go with putting words into my mouth again. I already asked you to stop, should I prepare a blade?I never assumed you were never in a situation like that... I simply said I hope you never do go through it. And by the way, not everyone who goes through a self-defense situation has had the same circumstances as you may or may not have. Bold of YOU to think otherwise
And, once more (how many times should I write this?) I never said it was.And Dak'Rah thinking he can sway M'Benga? That is NOT A JUSTIFICATION FOR HARASSMENT!
The only security camera with a good view of what happened was attached to the malfunctioning biobed number two......Don't they have security cameras onboard starships?
just thought that perhaps the obvious solution to the unfixable biobed 2 issue will be the same as the unfixable M’Benga: replace them.The only security camera with a good view of what happened was attached to the malfunctioning biobed number two...![]()
I'm implying that you saying "it's not that hard" is an indication of privilege.And I already gave you a simple, straightforward answer. Multiple times. Even before you answered.
For the record, once again, harassing is obviously wrong, but killing someone who harass you isn’t justified.
Are you implying that women should kill harassers?
It’s not that hard to understand that killing someone who is verbally harassing you is wrong. That doesn’t seem “privilege” to me, just one of the basis of society.I'm implying that you saying "it's not that hard" is an indication of privilege.
The Klingons had no interest in trying to revive him, though.
on the contrary: like in the episode you seem only to see what you want to see. And you kept pestering me on something that was never an issue and I had already answered several times. Perhaps I should tell you to stop and kill you if you don’t.
You don’t know this is what happened.
And again you are pestering me with questions about things that have nothing to do with the issue here and hat I never questioned.
Bold of you to assume I’ve never been in a self-defence situation.
to you.
He obviously thought he could sway M’Benga and didn’t expect to die?
No really.
Once more, you are only seeing what you want to see into something that’s intentionally left unclear.
as said by multiple people, and also by the showmakers, the scene is shot in a way to intentionally leave doubt on what happened.
It could have been straight up murder, and if it was M’Benga was totally responsible of that.
It could have been self defence, but this brings up the issue of excess of force and not trying to revive the ambassador.
It could have even been suicide, but then why would M’Benga and Chapel lie?
You decided that for you it’s clearly the second option, but this is not “clear” to most, as, as said, the scene is intentionally left open to doubt.
sorry, I lost you here.
Yawhn, here we go with putting words into my mouth again. I already asked you to stop, should I prepare a blade?
And, once more (how many times should I write this?) I never said it was.
I'll be wearing the first ever 47 piece.
Socks are not a "two-piece".
I think it's safe to assume I have not killed anyone for harassing me, or even for raping me. But if a person who's been physically and mentally abused for years snaps and kills their abuser, I will look on that act (from an ethical, moral perspective) far differently than if the abuser kills that person.It’s not that hard to understand that killing someone who is verbally harassing you is wrong. That doesn’t seem “privilege” to me, just one of the basis of society.
Indeed, what the hell? What sane person kills someone bothering them? Getting it now maybe?That's TWICE that you are saying 'perhaps I should tell you to stop or I should kill you/prepare a blade'. Seriously, what the hell?
and literally nobody said otherwise.And AGAIN... Dak'Rah was HARASSING M'Benga because he told Dak'Rah to leave and he did not. Doesn't matter that he was 'trying to sway him'. And my original question was to forget about the death and go by just that... Dak'Rah should have left after the first time he was asked.
By all means! But this was not the case in the episode. And, as mentioned above, things are hardly black and white.I think it's safe to assume I have not killed anyone for harassing me, or even for raping me. But if a person who's been physically and mentally abused for years snaps and kills their abuser, I will look on that act (from an ethical, moral perspective) far differently than if the abuser kills that person.
Indeed, what the hell? What sane person kills someone bothering them? Getting it now maybe?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.