Fans have rejected it because civilization stops being that fragile when you hit the point the Federation was at even in just the 24th century.
Some fans may have rejected it.
Not all of us.
Last edited:
Fans have rejected it because civilization stops being that fragile when you hit the point the Federation was at even in just the 24th century.
Me neither. Because no warp capabilities sends the galaxy back to even before TOS or for that matter ENT. Sending the Federation and other galactic powers back a couple of centuries, sure. A thousand years? No.I never got that feeling.
Actually yes.Yeah...no
Honestly? The outlawing of anything even remotely connected to temporal technology probably did more damage then the Burn.Me neither. Because no warp capabilities sends the galaxy back to even before TOS or for that matter ENT. Sending the Federation and other galactic powers back a couple of centuries, sure. A thousand years? No.
Still nope.By then every mainline Starfleet ship was capable of restarting things due to a combination of computer capacity and replicators.
The writers basically had to have the Federation purposefully abandon a significant portion of their technology, and then have most of them sit around in a bubble doing pretty much nothing.

Same. Not sure when I was supposed to start worrying overly about canon but I missed the memo and learned to roll with it. It's really done wonders for my blood pressure.
Don't know what else to say. I just don't see the catastrophic canon blows to the franchise some do.
Plus you just get to enjoy things more.Same. Not sure when I was supposed to start worrying overly about canon but I missed the memo and learned to roll with it. It's really done wonders for my blood pressure.
I mean? Realistically they're not.
Don't know what else to say. I just don't see the catastrophic canon blows to the franchise some do.
Same. Not sure when I was supposed to start worrying overly about canon but I missed the memo and learned to roll with it. It's really done wonders for my blood pressure.
I still do. I do have a camera with that name brand, though.Tell me about it. I would pay good money to never hear the word "canon" again.
Remember when we watched this stuff for fun?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.Tell me about it. I would pay good money to never hear the word "canon" again.
Remember when we watched this stuff for fun?
I mean? Realistically they're not.
Trek makes Paramount way too much money to drop as a franchise at this point, so the worst case scenario in all this is literally just the network telling the writers to make Discovery's future an alternate timeline like they did with nuTrek.
This. This right here.I want to know how you can violate canon with an 800 year timeskip. Something being drastically different in the far future is an untold story not a contradiction.
Except the Doctor, and Agnes Jurati, and Wesley Crusher, and Goodgey, and all the Medusans, and all the Prophets, and all the Changelings, and all the Synths, and all the Exocomps, and all the El-Aurians, and all the Lanthanites, and all the Vorta clones.This isn't a time where Seven of Nine was made captain last year. All of those people are DUST. (I mean, unless Daystrom nabbed their corpse.)
Pedantry?Except the Doctor, and Agnes Jurati, and Wesley Crusher, and Goodgey, and all the Medusans, and all the Prophets, and all the Changelings, and all the Synths, and all the Exocomps, and all the El-Aurians, and all the Lanthanites, and all the Vorta clones.
I probably missed a few there, but you get my point.
i was on this BBS when ENT came out, and the forum wars of ENT's catastrophic offences against holy canon were the stuff of legend.
Don't know what else to say. I just don't see the catastrophic canon blows to the franchise some do.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.