• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 4x09 - "Rubicon"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    102
Clear progress has occurred in 75 years since the 23rd century... and we have seen even more improvements in the 24th century where development has been accellerating steadily.
mot so much: they are still using m/a reactors, subspace radio, impulse engines an so on. In fact they are still using 23rd century ships and we’ve seen a refitted excelsior go head to head against the defiant, supposedly one of the better armed ships in the fleet.

As you say: we have no frame of reference. And even less so for the 32th century.
 
you didn’t.

Also I’ve been wondering: didn’t they agree on stopping using the spore drive unless in cases of dire emergency in season two to avoid further damage to the micelial network? They seem to be using it quite a lot lately.
My understanding is that it was revealed that Culber was the one damaging the network and once they got him out everything was good. Though Stamets did mention this season that he'd told the people working on the new spore drive how to avoid harming the jahSepp with it.
 
Is there no security since Naan left?
The shuttle should have had a tactical team in tac gear .. Not 3 people in there standard uniform. .. None of them security..

This is an example of how Discovery got worse over the seasons.

In S01E03 they did send the away team in tactical gear and with at least one security officer over to the USS Glenn.
They used the tactical gear in S1-S3 a lot.

Why was the communications officer and the tactical officer on the team? (Token screen time for the characters out of pity?)
Why was the away team not in 32nd-century tactical gear?

It is as if the mission was destined to fail, so no point in making 32nd-century tactical gear for the characters.

I have my own little theory:

Did you notice something about that away team?
FL5bqNHXMAo3KBF

All male.

They all had to be rescued by Michael Burnham and the (almost) all-female bridge team.

The men are falling over each other and on their knees in front of women.
FL5byqIXsAA9wdF



Men prostrating towards Michael Burnham.
FL5buS7WUAgJUgB



When Michael Burnham, said that she wouldn't lead the boarding team, that wasn't a smart command decision, that was part of the setup.
FL5bmT3XMAsSubT


The boarding mission was destined to fail, and Michael Burnham can't fail! (unless it's a Xanatos gambit, like in S04E08)
 
This is an example of how Discovery got worse over the seasons.

In S01E03 they did send the away team in tactical gear and with at least one security officer over to the USS Glenn.
They used the tactical gear in S1-S3 a lot.

Why was the communications officer and the tactical officer on the team? (Token screen time for the characters out of pity?)
Why was the away team not in 32nd-century tactical gear?

It is as if the mission was destined to fail, so no point in making 32nd-century tactical gear for the characters.

I have my own little theory:

Did you notice something about that away team?
FL5bqNHXMAo3KBF

All male.

They all had to be rescued by Michael Burnham and the (almost) all-female bridge team.

The men are falling over each other and on their knees in front of women.
FL5byqIXsAA9wdF



Men prostrating towards Michael Burnham.
FL5buS7WUAgJUgB



When Michael Burnham, said that she wouldn't lead the boarding team, that wasn't a smart command decision, that was part of the setup.
FL5bmT3XMAsSubT


The boarding mission was destined to fail, and Michael Burnham can't fail! (unless it's a Xanatos gambit, like in S04E08)
The cult of Michael Burnham. Everyone worships her, and has done for a long time. Including Nahn, that's why she is compromised, and can't take command or talk MB down at the end.
 
This is an example of how Discovery got worse over the seasons.

In S01E03 they did send the away team in tactical gear and with at least one security officer over to the USS Glenn.
They used the tactical gear in S1-S3 a lot.

Why was the communications officer and the tactical officer on the team? (Token screen time for the characters out of pity?)
Why was the away team not in 32nd-century tactical gear?

It is as if the mission was destined to fail, so no point in making 32nd-century tactical gear for the characters.

I have my own little theory:

Did you notice something about that away team?
FL5bqNHXMAo3KBF

All male.

They all had to be rescued by Michael Burnham and the (almost) all-female bridge team.

The men are falling over each other and on their knees in front of women.
FL5byqIXsAA9wdF



Men prostrating towards Michael Burnham.
FL5buS7WUAgJUgB



When Michael Burnham, said that she wouldn't lead the boarding team, that wasn't a smart command decision, that was part of the setup.
FL5bmT3XMAsSubT


The boarding mission was destined to fail, and Michael Burnham can't fail! (unless it's a Xanatos gambit, like in S04E08)


A "Spock's Brain" homage!
 
This is an example of how Discovery got worse over the seasons.

In S01E03 they did send the away team in tactical gear and with at least one security officer over to the USS Glenn.
They used the tactical gear in S1-S3 a lot.

Why was the communications officer and the tactical officer on the team? (Token screen time for the characters out of pity?)
Why was the away team not in 32nd-century tactical gear?

It is as if the mission was destined to fail, so no point in making 32nd-century tactical gear for the characters.

I have my own little theory:

Did you notice something about that away team?
FL5bqNHXMAo3KBF

All male.

They all had to be rescued by Michael Burnham and the (almost) all-female bridge team.

The men are falling over each other and on their knees in front of women.
FL5byqIXsAA9wdF



Men prostrating towards Michael Burnham.
FL5buS7WUAgJUgB



When Michael Burnham, said that she wouldn't lead the boarding team, that wasn't a smart command decision, that was part of the setup.
FL5bmT3XMAsSubT


The boarding mission was destined to fail, and Michael Burnham can't fail! (unless it's a Xanatos gambit, like in S04E08)

Please tell me this is a sarcastic post!
 
It amazes me that someone who is so anti-Disco would spend so much time getting screen grabs and developing a hypothesis which in the end is really pretty silly. I won’t deny Disco has its problems. Still… It’s a big franchise. Find a corner of it you do enjoy.
 
It is an original twist on an emergency transport. They weren't suddenly yanked across space, they were bowing to the goddess, Michael. (praise be her name)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top