Yeah a step in the right direction and definitely a soft reboot, in fact when Pike was speaking it sounded to me like it was aimed at the audience as well which was a nice touch, he could easily stay on if he is well received by fans, then when he returns to the Enterprise they could launch that show at the same time at the end of this season or maybe even season 3.Damn, it's almost impossible to keep up with these kind of threads. Overnight it has easily doubled in replies!
Overall I really liked “Brother”. A big improvement over much of season one's episodes and I hope it's a sign of a change in approach. Much of the episode did feel like a course-correction and soft reboot to me. Unlike others I'm not convinced this would have worked as the original pilot without much retooling, but really I welcome the somewhat lighter tone of the show as well as the somewhat shifting of the focus away from Burnham to the whole of the Discovery crew.
They really stress that the crew is in need of some healing and trust-building after Lorca. And in Pike they seem to have found the perfect Captain for that process. I almost wonder if they'll find a way of keeping Pike on as Discovery's captain for the remainder of the show after the season ends.
Still can't say I'm overly enthusiastic for the return of Georgiou, Section 31 and the Klingons in the following episodes, but I'm still hoping their involvement will be minimal.
I absolutely did!
Yes, this is something I noticed as well. In the first season, Tilly often functioned as a welcomed antidote to the serious tone of the story, but in an episode where everyone seems to quip left and right and the general approach seems to be much lighter, Tilly seemed a little over-the-top to me. Going forward I hope they'll find a less irritating way of integrating her.
Loved it! And for a moment there I wondered if they had completely reworked the title sequence. (Which they actually did for the proper title sequence. Not sure I need the stupid Section 31 badge in there, though.)
That's why Airiam looked so weird! I guess it'll grow on me, but the make-up looked much better on the original actress, I think. Do we have anything official about why they recast her other than the speculation upthread?
Yes, the incredibly looooong way those pods travelled through the tunnel before they finally left at the back of the ship was just ridiculous, especially once you consider they entered the pods in the shuttle bay, which already is at the back of the ship!
This, I think, was even more stupid than the pod thing (since we're likely never to see them again). Why the hell would the turbolifts travel inside such gigantic rooms?! Where is this even supposed to be on the ship? This completely contradicts every prior depiction of the turbolift tube system on Star Trek. When I saw the shot of those rollercoasters in the trailer I was convinced I was seeing some alien world or something, not the inside of Discovery! Now, not everything they decide to show has to look completely like I personally thought it would. But at the very least it should look logical and practical, which to me this does not.
Yes, they need to tone done the whole hologram thing! I don't think I ever need to see a character grabbing an invisible hologram thing and throw it in the air again. It just looks stupid to me. I mean, once even frickin' candles (!) have to be holographic you're definitely going overboard with the whole idea.
I agree. James Frain is doing a marvelous job as Sarek. I still think his casting was a stroke of genius.
Yeah, this didn't make a lot of sense. I mean, what has this woman not done in her career?! Where does test-piloting weirdly specific pods for a secret testbed class of ship even fit into here vita, timeline-wise?
Very nicely put. I completely agree.
Other observations:
A question for those who are more knowledgable in these matters: Does it really make sense for those photographic (?) units on the underside of the sauce that they use to make images of the asteroid field to use actual flash-lights? I get that it's probably a visual shorthand for “Look! Those are cameras taking photos!”, but nowadays you would never use flash-lights with a tele-lense, would you?
In a similar vein, I really don't know how to think about Sarus eyes being better than Dicovery's sensors. They did something similar in the pilot where they used Georgiou's telescope to see something their high-tech, 23rd century sensors couldn't, and it did make as much sense to me then as it does now.
Am I the only one who's bothered by the completely unbelievable anecdote about Kasseelian opera singers, who train their whole life for a single performance only to commit suicide immediately after?
Something else I didn't see anyone mention thus far: the music in this episode was wonderful! The quiet/tragic tones as young Michael is brought into the Sarek home; the energetic, percussive tune right before they slip into their Power Rangers suits; or the somber music when Michael steps into Spock's quarters on the Enterprise, that almost sounded like it tipped the hat to Gerald Fried's original Mr. Spock theme from “Amok Time”.
canon purists would have a heart attack, me myself,I'd love to see more diversity in alien cultures and fashion, so bring it onSo next season every white actor playing a Vulcan will be wearing an afro wig, and the female ones in cornrows and braids right since it does not matter, its only fiction.
Yeah, that did't make any sense.In a similar vein, I really don't know how to think about Sarus eyes being better than Dicovery's sensors. They did something similar in the pilot where they used Georgiou's telescope to see something their high-tech, 23rd century sensors couldn't, and it did make as much sense to me then as it does now.
What bothered me most about that was how reverently the anecdote was told like it was something awesome and inspiring rather than totally fucked up. Though I think it could form a basis of a really cool TNGesque episode about choice, social norms and peer pressure.Am I the only one who's bothered by the completely unbelievable anecdote about Kasseelian opera singers, who train their whole life for a single performance only to commit suicide immediately after?
Yeah, that did't make any sense.
What bothered me most about that was how reverently the anecdote was told like it was something awesome and inspiring rather than totally fucked up. Though I think it could form a basis of a really cool TNGesque episode about choice, social norms and peer pressure.
Right. To me pointless CGI chases are the peak of boredom, I'd take dealing with important social issues over that any day.i hope we don't see any tng-esque eoisode at all - timeline-wise a couple of days have to pass untill we arrive at that peak of boredom
Plus we all know 6 billion Vulcan exactly the same all the time right? Why is it hard for some fans to accept diversity in a fictional species, or are only humans allowed to change their looks?
Right. To me pointless CGI chases are the peak of boredom, I'd take dealing with important social issues over that any day.
Yep. That's what I thought of when I saw that. Also the inner workings of the North Pole from The Polar Express. Why are these things always constructed as thrilling roller coasters?
And it makes absolutely no sense. The turbolifts were always just moving up/down and sideways in their tubes. Thats what you can see on the MSDs in the background an on the movement-indicators in the turbolift-pods. And so since the first episode of TOS.
To built a rollercoaster for the turbolift-pods would need so much more open space and that all through the ship, that would be inefficient and would make the deck layouts absolutely random.
Yeah but how big is it, that's the real question.
It looks to me like that's in the neck, its the only part of the ship with enough height, assuming we are looking bottom up or top down.
Right. To me pointless CGI chases are the peak of boredom, I'd take dealing with important social issues over that any day.
i hope we don't see any tng-esque eoisode at all - timeline-wise a couple of days have to pass untill we arrive at that peak of boredom
Right. To me pointless CGI chases are the peak of boredom, I'd take dealing with important social issues over that any day.
Gotta be with @oberth on this one. I've got 100s and 100s of hours of "TNG-like episodes," all produced with declining quality and poignancy back in the 80s and 90s under the guise of "dealing with important social issues" (which is almost a vomit-inducing joke of a trope at this point). I'm good. That repetitive formula drove me into hibernation with Trek for years. I don't need Star Trek to shine a light on society or politics for me. I need it to entertain me and allow for some escapism by doing cool sci-fi , great character drama, action/adventure, some over the top spectacles, and a few unexpected twists.
And it makes absolutely no sense. The turbolifts were always just moving up/down and sideways in their tubes. Thats what you can see on the MSDs in the background an on the movement-indicators in the turbolift-pods. And so since the first episode of TOS.
To built a rollercoaster for the turbolift-pods would need so much more open space and that all through the ship, that would be inefficient and would make the deck layouts absolutely random.
After this episode would anyone dare attempt to do an internal deck layout of the Discovery.There are several things in Star Trek that are bold and visible, right up on the screen, and punching you in the face with their stupidity/implausibility/lack of common sense
It is in those times that I choose to sigh deeply and forget.
This is one of those times.
Absolutely, if I just wanted angst and the same issues repeated over and over again I would watch daytime soapy television, I don't know how anyone can watch that stuff without their brains dying.Gotta be with @oberth on this one. I've got 100s and 100s of hours of "TNG-like episodes," all produced with declining quality and poignancy back in the 80s and 90s under the guise of "dealing with important social issues" (which is almost a vomit-inducing joke of a trope at this point). I'm good. That repetitive formula drove me into hibernation with Trek for years. I don't need Star Trek to shine a light on society or politics for me. I need it to entertain me and allow for some escapism by doing cool sci-fi , great character drama, action/adventure, some over the top spectacles, and a few unexpected twists.
i agree with pretty much everything you said in your original post but to be fair, we haven’t seen the Klingons talking yet. That, I think, will be the true test of dialogue clunkiness.The dialogue is much snappier and less clunky.
Well, then we we want fundamentally different things from the Star Trek.Its meant to be escapist entertainment with a side order of pew pew.
I still get nightmares from all the dialogue in the pilot episodes, I appreciate the attempt at authenticity but it was boring to watch and painful to listen to.i agree with pretty much everything you said in your original post but to be fair, we haven’t seen the
Klingons talking yet. That, I think, will be the true test of dialogue clunkiness.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.