It probably would have had too much nostalgia for my tastes, and I love callbacks.I wonder if we'll ever learn what Orci had in mind. He was the person they originally planned to write and direct the 3rd film, right?
It probably would have had too much nostalgia for my tastes, and I love callbacks.I wonder if we'll ever learn what Orci had in mind. He was the person they originally planned to write and direct the 3rd film, right?
You put a soldier on the front lines and spend years, even decades, teaching him to kill the enemy. More often than not in our world there are soldiers who were given a pat on the head and a release papers with no adjustment, or ability to adjust, from being a trainer killer to normal every day person.
In Krall's time, he was a soldier who killed and battled alien threats - then the Federation happened and without much more than a pat on the head the man who became an alien killer was given a ship and told to be normal. Much like the argument that the government and military failed real world veterans through the era's, the Federation's formation effected Krall the same way.
There's far more logic to him than there is Admiral Robocop who's motivations hinted at different things.
Even Kirk had issues with prospective peace with the Klingons.
Seeing it the second time will probably help, too.
Can y'all imagine what would have happened if Admiral Marcus had heard about the Khitomer Accords from Spock Prime?Excellent point. True, in TUC, even Kirk wondered where he'd fit in. Chang couldn't stand the idea of peace, either. And neither could other members of Starfleet and the Klingon Empire. I guess some of them sabotaging the peace talks because they can't stand the idea of peace isn't much different than Edison wanting to destroy Yorktown for pretty much the same reason.
This is much better than the "Australian Crawl or American Crawl" question which was the first thing which popped into my head.I just assumed he was a distant descendant (or maybe just a fan) of Diana Krall and decided to use that as a 'nym.![]()
"We've replaced Montgomery Scotty's magic pixie dust with powdered dilithium crystals. Let's see if he notices the difference!"Well, that's it, isn't it? It has to have an acceptable level of believability, and it doesn't for you, but does for me.
Isn't pixie dust made out of red matter?
Some things I had problems with are becoming clearer to me, now. Seeing it the second time will probably help, too.
I can't believe how some fans have "overthought" the Franklin's place in the timeline...some theories and thoughts have been quite silly. Here is a new article outlining the same backstory I postulated here on the BBS last week...I know people will still nitpick "Yes, but..." But I am posting the article to bring clarity to the conversation,
http://trekcore.com/blog/2016/07/heres-where-the-franklin-fits-in-the-star-trek-timeline/
Nope. protomatter.Well, that's it, isn't it? It has to have an acceptable level of believability, and it doesn't for you, but does for me.
Isn't pixie dust made out of red matter?
This is one of my biggest complaints, as well. The film lacks urgency and suspense. I never felt like the crew was ever in any real danger. And, to that end, despite the rather creative use of music, I found the DXM to be pretty ridiculous, even by Star Trek standards.I found it extremely entertaining and never dull, but for some reason I never really felt the stakes were as high as they actually were.
This is one of my biggest complaints, as well. The film lacks urgency and suspense. I never felt like the crew was ever in any real danger. And, to that end, despite the rather creative use of music, I found the DXM to be pretty ridiculous, even by Star Trek standards.
Not planning on seeing it at all as I am boycotting CBS/Paramount. And before you ask - I have been a Trekker from day one and have watched over the decades as CBS/Paramount, IMHO, have sucked the life out of Gene's vision of Star Trek. If the trailer for the new series, if that was in fact what it was, shown at Comic Con is any indication Star Trek will die in 2017.
I assume that happened between saving the day and getting the new ship.And Kirk and co never mourn or pause to reflect on all the casualties. I mean, surely there must have been a pretty high loss of life considering how big the E is and how viciously it was destroyed.
That's what Kirk's "to absent friends" toast was for.And Kirk and co never mourn or pause to reflect on all the casualties. I mean, surely there must have been a pretty high loss of life considering how big the E is and how viciously it was destroyed.
They never said. One of the promotional websites for the 2009 movie said she had a crew of 1100. Even if they went with the TOS 400 crew, I must admit I wonder how all the survivors fitted into the tiny USS Franklin!What is the crew compliment of the Enterprise in the JJVerse? Any guess as to how many survived the Enterprise's destruction?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.