And that doesn't answer the question at all.
What petition? I don't follow things like that.
And that doesn't answer the question at all.
That surprises me given the posts that all of us want Legacy and the certitude it will make money/be a success.What petition? I don't follow things like that.
Is there no petition for "Year One"?That surprises me given the posts that all of us want Legacy and the certitude it will make money/be a success.
![]()
I figured people would do everything in their power to let the Powers That Be know of this strong interest. Isn't that
Not thus far.Is there no petition for "Year One"?
Nope.Paul Wesley's Kirk doesn't resonate with me.
What I really want, is a full-on Star Trek reboot. No continuity, a completely fresh start and a serious take with new writers, producers and directors. And less quips.
So, apart from Legacy, what are my petition options?Is there no petition for "Year One"?
So, apart from Legacy, what are my petition options?
There is a prodigy one...So, apart from Legacy, what are my petition options?
Paul Wesley's Kirk doesn't resonate with me.
What I really want, is a full-on Star Trek reboot. No continuity, a completely fresh start and a serious take with new writers, producers and directors. And less quips.
Not anethema so much to me as personal preference I'd just rather see a new stories.As I've said before, I'd actually really like to see someone rework classic TOS episodes with fresh scripts (and maybe some story changes as well). I'd just love to see existing stories readapted, and how they might be different from the 1960s versions.
That seems to be anathema in Trek fandom, though.
Not anethema so much to me as personal preference I'd just rather see a new stories.![]()
No "We" did not and do not.I really hope this doesn't happen. I've nearly had my fill of prequels. We all wanted a Legacy show set in the 25th century. Continuing in that timeline would be better.
Unlike many here, I'd be interested in watching Legacy. Thanks to TNG and particularly DS9, I'm much more vested in that timeframe than the 32nd century.I really hope this doesn't happen. I've nearly had my fill of prequels. We all wanted a Legacy show set in the 25th century. Continuing in that timeline would be better.
I'd be OK with a post-TOS show. But Year One sounds so much more interesting!Nope.
And put me down as having no interest in a post-TOS premise.
If any ST series has a chance of being picked up at this point, it's Year One. Name recognition of Kirk and Spock. The social footprint seems to be the largest for TOS. After all, which era did JJ go with for his movies? Plus standing sets!I think “Year One” discourse is going to be an interesting case study in the various types of fandom chatter. Because you’ve got the “Legacy” stuff, which has three distinct groups:
With “Year One”, my early read on the fanbase is that things are more muted in both directions:
- “Hell yes.”
- “Hell no.”
- “Hell yes, but not for the memberberries.” (Myself.)
There’s less passion here. Which kind of makes it a nonstarter to some extent. I made the thread on this over on the Future Trek board, and like, I’m not surprised by that, either.
- “Okay, sure.”
- “I dunno. Nah.”
From a business sense, it’s probably savvy for Goldsman to have gotten this out right now rather than closer to Strange New Worlds’ series finale. And perhaps excitement will build over time. But right now, I’m not sure the initial reaction to the notion is quite where he and Alonso Myers might have hoped. It’s telling that there’s yet to be any discernible galvanization around it from any corner of the net that I’ve researched.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.