Concerns about the new ST
- Thread starter AdmiralBruno
- Start date
Not that I'm a huge TNG fan, but season 7 was a mixed bag, especially "Sub-Rosa." It felt like they were running out of ideas.
He was genetically engineered and then reentered as "Thomas Eugene Paris." His dad is actually adoptive, and supervised his reintroduction to Starfleet to see if a genetically engineered soldier would work against the Dominon. Unfortunately, things went wrong.You could say Tom Paris was in TNG. Nick Locarno was just his secret identity.
You could say Tom Paris was in TNG. Nick Locarno was just his secret identity.
And maybe Decker and Ilia were reincarnated as Riker and Troi.
V'ger works in mysterious ways.And maybe Decker and Ilia were reincarnated as Riker and Troi.
Kor
And there was that cut scene in Insurrection.
So like 2% of the characters should LBGT?
Especially when you count bisexual people, the standard old school percents I've always heard is 5 to 10% of the population will self identify as LGBT. Considering that social pressures will cause some people to repress their true self, the percentage may well be a bit higher than that. Considering that for the last fifty odd years Trek has been virtually all hetero, I'm ok if there's slightly more that than.
Try 10% if you're looking for a round number.
In all fairness, streaming is a game-changer that allows for a slow start by network standards. ENT ratings might not have been enough for UPN but by basic cable standards, they were great.
Most of the time, the true fan card gets pulled to justify someone's hate for ENT. But it's never a good thing to see it, no matter what side it's from.
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing too. I'm surprised the moderators let the thread go.
I thought it started losing steam in the fifth annd sixth season. Trek shows have three or four good seasons in them at best.
You are saying the HEIGHT of DS9... the dominion war arc wasn't great?I thought it started losing steam in the fifth annd sixth season. Trek shows have three or four good seasons in them at best.
I was talking about TNG
you said trek shows are not good after three or four seasons? I disagree.
As for the other people..... in 2014 the NHIS reported that 1.6 percent of Americans identified as gay/lesbian, and 0.7 percent as bisexual. That's 2.3%. Statistically speaking one of the six or seven main characters wouldn't fit in that group. If they do it it's simply for the sake of pandering. As I said.. DS9 had a legit story reason for the brief lesbian story.... this surely won't
why do you care so much?
Why do you?
13 episodes works for me as they can dump the filler crap--look at the sheer awesomeness that is/was "Firefly"!
As for LGBT, all the characters should be non-heterosexual (to make up for the lack of orientation diversity thus far) so it's just a 60 minute orgy on screen for every episode
As for LGBT, all the characters should be non-heterosexual (to make up for the lack of orientation diversity thus far) so it's just a 60 minute orgy on screen for every episode
I'm still bitter about how these SJW's shoehorned a Russian, a Japanese man, and worst of all a black woman into the bridge crew.
He said Trek shows have three or four good seasons in them, not Trek shows aren't good after the first three or four seasons.
TNG - 3, 4, 5, 6
DS9 - 4, 5, 6, 7
Similar threads
