• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Agents of SHIELD. Season 1 Discussion Thread

OK, I missed that. Good catch everyone.

I've been obviously disagreeing with Sci, so it seems odd to defend him, but I will say that Marvel seems to want to eat their cake and still have it with HYDRA and Nazis. They want to distance themselves from Nazis to a significant degree with the organization, but they like making "cute" Nazi references like Operation Paperclip and HYDRA fleeing to Latin America to still evoke the feelings of Nazi Germany in the organization.

Yeah. I mean, I get that they want to give the conflict between SHIELD and Hydra the moral gravity of a conflict between competing ideologies, but the fact that there's no clear Hydra ideology beyond "we want to be in charge" undermines that. Yeah, explicitly linking Hydra to Nazism could add a level of darkness to it that they don't necessarily want in an adventure story marketed to kids -- but I do think that Marvel is, as you say, trying to have their cake and eat it too that way.

That being said, because of their deliberate distancing, I do agree it isn't fair to criticize the plot by suggesting people wouldn't join an organization with an ideology of which HYDRA has not been shown to have.

Well, let me be clear here: I'm not criticizing the plot per se. The plot -- "There's an evil conspiracy within the government, and Our Heroes must defeat them before they take over!" -- would work no matter what Hydra's ideology is. If Hydra were a bunch of corporate CEOs trying to launch a coup a la Iron Man 3, it would work. If Hydra were a bunch of aliens, it would work. If Hydra were agents of the Vegan Police, it would work.

My critique is two-fold: 1. That it seems implausible to me that an organization that grew out of the Nazi Party would have abandoned key aspects of Nazi or fascist ideology, because of the psychological foundation upon which fascism is built; and 2. that giving Hydra the motifs of fascism -- their Nazi-like symbol, the "Heil Hitler"-like "Hail Hydra," the modified Nazi salute -- without giving them an explicitly fascist ideology hurts the verisimilitude of the story, because we're left not fully understanding their motivations beyond "wanting to take control."

My critique, in other words, has to do with what motivates the Hydra characters more than the plot per se.

Side-note: Three years ago, when I went to see Captain America: The First Avenger with a friend of mine who is Jewish, she said she was disappointed. She wanted, she said, to see Captain America fight Nazis, but he spent the whole film fighting Hydra instead. I tried to argue to her that Hydra were just Nazis by any other name, but her disappointment persisted.

Hence the "Out of the shadows..." order. Once the mass killings by Helicarrier artillery began, the HYDRA "cat" was going to be out of the bag anyway, right?

Yes, especially considering that
the target list included the President of the United States. Firing a missile into the White House is not exactly a stealth operation.

My interpretation was that Hydra was going to kill the President, Vice President (if the office hasn't been left vacant post-Iron Man 3, that is) the Cabinet, and most of Congress, leaving Senator Stern and enough surviving Members of Congress (possibly themselves Hydra agents?) alive so that Stern could get appointed Senate President Pro Tempore and thereby be immediately elevated to the Presidency per the 25th Amendment. (This especially seems to make sense, because the targeting imagine that listed President Ellis was actually of the Capitol -- apparently President Ellis was on the Hill that day, which is unusual but not impossible.)

From there, I assumed that the new Hydra-controlled government would "defeat" the Hellicarriers and "discover" that SHIELD had been behind the coup, and leak info to the public implicating SHIELD and Our Heroes in the coup and the mass murders, thereby turning public opinion against them and leaving the government in the hands of Hydra. I just assumed Hydra would stay publicly unknown even as it took power, perhaps later establishing a new front organization in the form of a new, American fascist political party.

That's just my interpretation, though -- it's just as legitimate to interpret things as, Hydra was just going to seize power openly in the chaos of having overthrown the major world governments.

Side-note #2: This is President Matthew Ellis's second coup attempt in as many years. Poor guy needs to catch a break!

Side-note #3: SHIELD has apparently been branded a terrorist organization... why? I mean, the general public has to know that SHIELD was behind the Avengers, who saved the world in the Battle of New York. And the Snowden-style super-leak means they should know and understand that Hydra infiltrated SHIELD and was behind the coup/mass murder attempt. Granted that it makes sense for the U.S. government to shut SHIELD bases down and put them under U.S. Army control temporarily, but the idea of declaring SHIELD a terrorist organization and legally dissolving it seems like a ridiculous over-reaction in defiance of what ought to be common public knowledge.

Also, when do we think Natasha's hearing at the end of TWS takes place relative to the events of Agents of SHIELD? She certainly didn't seem in any danger of imminent arrest the way Coulson and company are, yet everyone knew she was SHIELD.

Side-note #4:
Who else do you think Hydra was targeting in their mass murder attempt? Right off the bat, I imagine they were going to target the U.S. Supreme Court, the Pentagon leadership, the Canadian P.M. and Parliament, NORAD, and as many other major governments -- British, French, German, Russian, Chinese, Italian, Japanese, E.U., etc. -- as they possibly could. On top, of course, of the various super-powered persons out there.
 
Side-note #3: SHIELD has apparently been branded a terrorist organization... why? I mean, the general public has to know that SHIELD was behind the Avengers, who saved the world in the Battle of New York. And the Snowden-style super-leak means they should know and understand that Hydra infiltrated SHIELD and was behind the coup/mass murder attempt. Granted that it makes sense for the U.S. government to shut SHIELD bases down and put them under U.S. Army control temporarily, but the idea of declaring SHIELD a terrorist organization and legally dissolving it seems like a ridiculous over-reaction in defiance of what ought to be common public knowledge.

It's a punitive and panic-based over-reaction in the early hours and days after the first battles kicked off. We've seen that happen before in real-world history, have we not?

Also, when do we think Natasha's hearing at the end of TWS takes place relative to the events of Agents of SHIELD? She certainly didn't seem in any danger of imminent arrest the way Coulson and company are, yet everyone knew she was SHIELD.


I'm inclined to expect Natasha's testimony happens weeks or months after the Battle of the Triskelion. How we get from the events of "Providence" through "Beginning of the End" to Natasha's testimony...no idea yet.
 
I really don't think that the political ideology of villain groups in comic book movies bears close scrutiny, but FWIW, the first Cap film made it clear that Hydra wasn't about Hitler's ideology, it was about Schmitt's, and Schmitt's could have differed considerably. He was planning to blow Berlin off the map along with Allied capitals.

Throwing in the odd reminder of the Nazi Germany connection lends Hydra some verisimilitude and historical sense of menace, but getting all worked up about Hydra's implied ideological origins makes about as much sense as getting worked up over whether President Ellis is supposed to be a Republican or a Democrat.
 
Side-note #3: SHIELD has apparently been branded a terrorist organization... why? I mean, the general public has to know that SHIELD was behind the Avengers, who saved the world in the Battle of New York. And the Snowden-style super-leak means they should know and understand that Hydra infiltrated SHIELD and was behind the coup/mass murder attempt. Granted that it makes sense for the U.S. government to shut SHIELD bases down and put them under U.S. Army control temporarily, but the idea of declaring SHIELD a terrorist organization and legally dissolving it seems like a ridiculous over-reaction in defiance of what ought to be common public knowledge.

It's a punitive and panic-based over-reaction in the early hours and days after the first battles kicked off. We've seen that happen before in real-world history, have we not?

Also, when do we think Natasha's hearing at the end of TWS takes place relative to the events of Agents of SHIELD? She certainly didn't seem in any danger of imminent arrest the way Coulson and company are, yet everyone knew she was SHIELD.


I'm inclined to expect Natasha's testimony happens weeks or months after the Battle of the Triskelion. How we get from the events of "Providence" through "Beginning of the End" to Natasha's testimony...no idea yet.

I don't quite know if they were going to be arrested, I thought they mentioned subpoenas as a possibility. SHIELD was going to be shut down, but that's about it.

Given the timeframe, I don't think we're quite caught up to the hearing in the movie, but I could be wrong. Hearings in Congress aren't usually scheduled for the next day.
 
Sci said:
Side-note #3: SHIELD has apparently been branded a terrorist organization... why? I mean, the general public has to know that SHIELD was behind the Avengers, who saved the world in the Battle of New York. And the Snowden-style super-leak means they should know and understand that Hydra infiltrated SHIELD and was behind the coup/mass murder attempt. Granted that it makes sense for the U.S. government to shut SHIELD bases down and put them under U.S. Army control temporarily, but the idea of declaring SHIELD a terrorist organization and legally dissolving it seems like a ridiculous over-reaction in defiance of what ought to be common public knowledge.

It's a punitive and panic-based over-reaction in the early hours and days after the first battles kicked off. We've seen that happen before in real-world history, have we not?

I'm not aware of any instances where the United States government has ever branded either one of its own armed service branches, or an international organization founded and operated with the United States's funding and participation (whichever SHIELD may be), as a terrorist organization. Even when the government was convinced its State Department had been infiltrated from top to bottom by enemy agents during the McCarthy era, it didn't brand that entire department as an illegal organization.
 
I think the "terrorist organization" thing is more about the fact that nobody knows for sure who in SHIELD is loyal and who's a HYDRA agent, so they want to take everyone into custody and dismantle the organization just to make sure the surviving HYDRA agents within SHIELD aren't still free to do harm. Even in the movie, Cap concluded that they needed to tear SHIELD down completely, that it had been too badly infested to be rescued. It was like a building whose foundations were so rotted away that the only option was to demolish it and build a new one in its place.

And the episode is set right after the movie ended. Natasha's leak has been made, but it would take weeks to sort through it all and figure out what really happened. The government probably isn't sure yet how much of what happened came from SHIELD and how much came from HYDRA. It'll take time to sort that all out, and that might be what we see happening over the remainder of the season.
 
Now all they need is a fugitive fleet!

When I took Ancient Lit, I described the Aeneid as being a story about a "ragtag fugitive fleet." Someone in class laughed and the prof asked, "That's another reference, right? you need to take Pop Culture Narrative."

I also said it was fanfic.
 
OK, I missed that. Good catch everyone.

I've been obviously disagreeing with Sci, so it seems odd to defend him, but I will say that Marvel seems to want to eat their cake and still have it with HYDRA and Nazis. They want to distance themselves from Nazis to a significant degree with the organization, but they like making "cute" Nazi references like Operation Paperclip and HYDRA fleeing to Latin America to still evoke the feelings of Nazi Germany in the organization. That being said, because of their deliberate distancing, I do agree it isn't fair to criticize the plot by suggesting people wouldn't join an organization with an ideology of which HYDRA has not been shown to have.
It is still a secret organization and when characters went to their Smithsonian they saw the only super hero fighting the super Nazi's. Jump to the present when everyone thinks Hydra was destroyed 70 years before here is a gunman throwing the double Nazi salute what is a Raina supposed to think?
The Hydra salute is not a "double Nazi salute. The Hydra salute is done with a closed fist, with arms almost straight in the air. In the comics is was done to simulate the mythical Hydra with it multiple heads.
 
Use the common man test.A arm shoots out with a cry of heil, pop quiz what do have. No matter how hard they are trying to politically pivot.
 
I really don't think that the political ideology of villain groups in comic book movies bears close scrutiny, but FWIW, the first Cap film made it clear that Hydra wasn't about Hitler's ideology, it was about Schmitt's, and Schmitt's could have differed considerably. He was planning to blow Berlin off the map along with Allied capitals.

Plus Nazis ideology was the reason Red Skull was given HYDRA and dumped in the mountains to be forgotten about, so I don't see why he would stick to it.
 
Use the common man test.A arm shoots out with a cry of heil, pop quiz what do have. No matter how hard they are trying to politically pivot.
And if they use two hands they think of Rocky.

It's usually "hail Hydra" not "heil". A subtle difference that even the common man might notice. The clinched fist as well.
 
The Nazi imagery is so powerful they had the Garrett character announce to the audience that we will not see it again with his order to the out of the dark uniformed Hydra/SHIELD
 
I still don't understand why anyone would object to portraying the villains as Nazis, or affiliated with them. If it's good enough for Indiana Jones, why isn't it okay for Phil Coulson?
 
I saw a pretty good reason, merchandise. Whether they eventually do merchandise for the show or from the movies, Marvel is not going to want to sell toys with Nazi imagery to little kids.
 
Yep, they make for solid villains, but not for merch sales. And there's those German laws in terms of sales of TV broadcast rights, books, movie tickets and everything else to consider as well.
 
The Nazi imagery is so powerful they had the Garrett character announce to the audience that we will not see it again with his order to the out of the dark uniformed Hydra/SHIELD
Played as a joke to me. In character for Garrett to admonish an OTT type.
 
Yep, they make for solid villains, but not for merch sales. And there's those German laws in terms of sales of TV broadcast rights, books, movie tickets and everything else to consider as well.
Since they don't use the swastika or SS uniforms, I don't see the problem.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top